Literature DB >> 2295272

Manometric assessment of patients with obstetric injuries and fecal incontinence.

P L Roberts1, J A Coller, D J Schoetz, M C Veidenheimer.   

Abstract

Anorectal manometry was performed with a multilumen continuously perfused catheter in nine women with fecal incontinence after vaginal delivery. All patients had a third-degree or fourth-degree perineal laceration. The median age was 30 (range, 24 to 38) years. Anal manometry revealed low resting and squeeze pressures with a mean pressure of 28.7 +/- 5.3 mm Hg (normal, 60 to 80 mm Hg) and 42.5 +/- 5.9 mm Hg (normal, 100 to 150 mm Hg), respectively. Seven of nine patients had specific anterior quadrant defects demonstrated by cross-sectional analysis of the sphincter. In addition, five patients had evidence of global defects of the sphincter or relatively low pressures in other portions of the sphincter. Follow-up manometric data were obtained in four patients after reconstruction of the sphincter and demonstrated a mean improvement of resting and squeeze pressures of 5.1 mm Hg and 16.0 mm Hg, respectively. Although specific anterior defects may be expected with the history of obstetric trauma, the presence of global defects of the sphincter was unexpected and may support the role of injury to the innervation of the musculature of the pelvic floor as a contributing cause of fecal incontinence after childbirth. Anal manometry provides a quantitative assessment of sphincter function and dysfunction and is an important part of the preoperative assessment of patients with fecal incontinence from obstetric injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2295272     DOI: 10.1007/bf02053195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  8 in total

1.  Age effects on anorectal pressure in anal continent women with lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Authors:  Soo-Cheen Ng; Gin-Den Chen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-06-22

2.  Alteration of anal sphincter function in patients with levator avulsion: observational study.

Authors:  María Aubá Guedea; Juan Luis Alcázar Zambrano; Jorge Baixauli Fons; Leire Juez Viana; Begoña Olartecoechea Linaje; Jose Ángel Mínguez Milio
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Evaluation of vector manometry for characterization of functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; Manfred Nagelschmidt; Irina Radinski; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Anal pressure vectography is of no apparent benefit for sphincter evaluation.

Authors:  Y K Yang; S D Wexner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  The Water-Holding Procedure for Ensuring Postoperative Continence Prior Restoring Intestinal Continuity.

Authors:  Frank Schwandner; Ulrich Klimars; Michael Gock; Leif Schiffmann; Maria Witte; Tobias Schiergens; Markus Rentsch; Ernst Klar; Florian Kühn
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Risk factors for anal sphincter disruption during child birth.

Authors:  D N Samarasekera; M T Bekhit; J P Preston; C T M Speakman
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Influence of perineal prostatectomy on anal continence.

Authors:  Nádia Ricci Guilger; José Marcio Neves Jorge; Renato Prado Costa; Fernando Cesar Salla; Magaly Gemio Teixeira; Sergio Carlos Nahas; Ivan Cecconello
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Absent or impaired rectoanal inhibitory reflex as a diagnostic factor for high-grade (grade III-V) rectal prolapse: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Byung-Soo Park; Sung Hwan Cho; Gyung Mo Son; Hyun Sung Kim; Yong-Hoon Cho; Dae Gon Ryu; Su Jin Kim; Su Bum Park; Cheol Woong Choi; Hyung Wook Kim; Tae Un Kim; Dong Soo Suh; Myunghee Yoon; Hong Jae Jo
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.067

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.