Literature DB >> 30825120

The Water-Holding Procedure for Ensuring Postoperative Continence Prior Restoring Intestinal Continuity.

Frank Schwandner1, Ulrich Klimars1, Michael Gock1, Leif Schiffmann1, Maria Witte1, Tobias Schiergens2, Markus Rentsch2, Ernst Klar1, Florian Kühn3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A defunctioning stoma can become necessary in a relevant number of patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. As a matter of course, patients seek an early closure of the stoma. However, preoperative management of these patients varies and the prediction of continence after stoma removal can become challenging. Patients might be fully continent despite low manometric pressures and vice versa. An easy and reliable way to predict continence after stoma reversal would improve patients' management and outcome. Although frequently performed in various surgical centers in Germany, there is no published data on the water-holding test. Hence, this is the first study evaluating the role of the test in clinical practice.
METHOD: We performed a prospective pilot study to evaluate the role of anorectal manometry and the water-holding procedure as a predictor of postoperative continence prior to stoma reversal. Inclusion criteria were a successfully passed water-holding test, any type of fecal diversion and the possibility of restoring intestinal continuity. Preoperative low manometric pressure levels were not an exclusion criteria for stoma reversal. Fifty-two patients with ostomy were consecutively enrolled in this study between October 2013 and February 2016. Anorectal manometry was performed in all patients prior to stoma reversal. After stoma removal, patients were followed-up for 6 months. Postoperative incontinence was determined using the Wexner incontinence score.
RESULTS: A total of 52 patients (38 males, 14 females) were included at an average age of 59 (range 33-83) years. Most frequent indications for intestinal diversion were rectal cancer surgery, IBD-related surgery, or surgery for diverticular disease. Low anterior rectal resection was performed in 17 patients (32.7%), followed by a proctocolectomy in 9 (17.3%), colectomy in 9 (17.3%), and recto-sigmoid resection in 7 patients (13.5%). Median time from stoma creation to reversal was 206 days (range 48-871 days). All patients had successfully passed the standardized water-holding test. At the same time, the majority of patients had low preoperative manometric pressure values and would normally not have been reversed at that point. The median postoperative Wexner incontinence score was at 1.5 (range 0-20), 0.5 (range 0-14), and 0 (range 0-11) at 14, 60, and 180 days after stoma reversal. Low preoperative manometric squeeze and/or resting pressure levels were not associated with a higher postoperative incontinence score at 14, 60, or 180 days after stoma reversal.
CONCLUSION: A standardized water-holding test can function as an easy and reliable method before stoma reversal to predict sufficient postoperative fecal continence. In case of a sufficient water-holding test despite low manometric pressure levels, the risk for postoperative anal incontinence seems to be low. Preoperative manometric pressure levels do not appear to predict postoperative continence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fecal incontinence; Manometry; Stoma reversal; Water-holding test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30825120     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04171-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  23 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of anorectal function after total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma with or without preoperative radiotherapy.

Authors:  P van Duijvendijk; J F M Slors; C W Taat; W F van Tets; G van Tienhoven; H Obertop; G E E Boeckxstaens
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Pathophysiology of adult fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Serial evaluation of anorectal function following low anterior resection of the rectum.

Authors:  S J Lee; Y S Park
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Long-term Quality of Life of Patients With Permanent End Ileostomy: Results of a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Tobias S Schiergens; Verena Hoffmann; Tamara N Schobel; Gerhard H Englert; Martin E Kreis; Wolfgang E Thasler; Jens Werner; Michael S Kasparek
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Quality of life after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and temporary loop ileostomy for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  D P O'Leary; C J Fide; C Foy; M E Lucarotti
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Manometric assessment of patients with obstetric injuries and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  P L Roberts; J A Coller; D J Schoetz; M C Veidenheimer
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Marcel den Dulk; Marije Smit; Koen C M J Peeters; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Harm J T Rutten; Theo Wiggers; Hein Putter; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 8.  Expert consensus document: Advances in the evaluation of anorectal function.

Authors:  Emma V Carrington; S Mark Scott; Adil Bharucha; François Mion; Jose M Remes-Troche; Allison Malcolm; Henriette Heinrich; Mark Fox; Satish S Rao
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 46.802

9.  [Anorectal manometry].

Authors:  C Pehl; P Enck; A Franke; T Frieling; W Heitland; A Herold; H Hinninghofen; M Karaus; J Keller; H-J Krammer; M Kreis; R Kuhlbusch-Zicklam; H Mönnikes; U Münnich; T Schiedeck; M Schmidtmann
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Factors affecting timing of closure and non-reversal of temporary ileostomies.

Authors:  M F Sier; L van Gelder; D T Ubbink; W A Bemelman; R J Oostenbroek
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  1 in total

1.  European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility recommendations for conducting gastrointestinal motility and function testing in the recovery phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jan Tack; Tim Vanuytsel; Jordi Serra; Anna Accarino; Vincenzo Stanghellini; Giovanni Barbara
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.960

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.