Literature DB >> 22952381

Automated extraction of critical test values and communications from unstructured radiology reports: an analysis of 9.3 million reports from 1990 to 2011.

Paras Lakhani1, Woojin Kim, Curtis P Langlotz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency of critical radiology results in 9.3 million radiology reports from our health system, to identify those containing documentation of communication by using automated text-classification algorithms, and to assess the impact of a policy requiring documentation of critical results communication.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant retrospective study received institutional review board approval. Text-mining algorithms that were previously validated to have mean accuracies of more than 90% for identifying certain critical results and documentation of communications were applied to a database of 9.3 million radiology reports. The frequency of critical results and documentation of communication were then determined from 1990 to 2011.
RESULTS: There was an increase in documentation of communication for all critical results from 1990 to 2011. In 1990, 19.0% of reports with critical values had evidence of documentation of communication compared with 72.4% of reports in 2010. The linear trend for increasing documentation of communications began in 1997 and continued until 2011 (P < .001). From 1990 to 2011, documentation of communication was highest in acute scrotal torsion (70.6%) and ectopic pregnancy (65.4%) and lowest in unexplained free-intraperitoneal air (29.5%) and malpositioned tubes (30.4%). In 2010-2011, radiologists were least likely to document communication of results for malpositioned endotracheal and enteric tubes (2010, 58.56%; 2011, 57.50%) and unexplained free-intraperitoneal air (2010, 59.57%; 2011, 75.51%). They were most likely to document communication of results for ectopic pregnancy (2010, 94.12%; 2011, 93.48%) and acute appendicitis (2010, 86.87%; 2011, 84.31%).
CONCLUSION: There was an increase in documentation of communication of critical results, which demonstrated a rising linear trend that began in 1997 and continued until 2011. The increasing trend began well before policy implementation, indicating that other factors such as heightened awareness among radiologists likely had a role. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22952381     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

Review 1.  Natural Language Processing Technologies in Radiology Research and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Tianrun Cai; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Sheng Yu; Tatiana Kelil; Beth Ripley; Kanako K Kumamaru; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): A Guide for Authors and Reviewers.

Authors:  John Mongan; Linda Moy; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-03-25

3.  Imaging Informatics: 25 Years of Progress.

Authors:  J P Agrawal; B J Erickson; C E Kahn
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-06-30

4.  Integrating Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning Algorithms to Categorize Oncologic Response in Radiology Reports.

Authors:  Po-Hao Chen; Hanna Zafar; Maya Galperin-Aizenberg; Tessa Cook
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Early-stage COVID-19 pandemic observations on pulmonary embolism using nationwide multi-institutional data harvesting.

Authors:  Axel Wismüller; Adora M DSouza; Anas Z Abidin; M Ali Vosoughi; Christopher Gange; Isabel O Cortopassi; Gracijela Bozovic; Alexander A Bankier; Kiran Batra; Yosef Chodakiewitz; Yin Xi; Christopher T Whitlow; Janardhana Ponnatapura; Gary J Wendt; Eric P Weinberg; Larry Stockmaster; David A Shrier; Min Chul Shin; Roshan Modi; Hao Steven Lo; Seth Kligerman; Aws Hamid; Lewis D Hahn; Glenn M Garcia; Jonathan H Chung; Talissa Altes; Suhny Abbara; Anna S Bader
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-08-19

6.  Preparing Medical Imaging Data for Machine Learning.

Authors:  Martin J Willemink; Wojciech A Koszek; Cailin Hardell; Jie Wu; Dominik Fleischmann; Hugh Harvey; Les R Folio; Ronald M Summers; Daniel L Rubin; Matthew P Lungren
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 11.105

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.