Literature DB >> 22951373

Tibialis anterior or posterior allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus hamstring autograft reconstruction: an economic analysis in a hospital-based outpatient setting.

Patrick E Greis1, Benjamin Shay Koch, Bart Adams.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze and compare the direct costs, reimbursement rates, gross contribution margins, and operating room and recovery room times for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions with the use of soft-tissue allografts and autografts. We aimed to determine the financial impact of using allograft tissue for ACL reconstruction in a hospital-based outpatient setting.
METHODS: Financial data from the facility billing database and operating room (OR) reports from the electronic medical record were queried to identify all patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction during a 12-month period. A subset of patients who had isolated ACL reconstruction with or without simple meniscectomy or chondral debridement was identified as the study group. We compared 46 ACL reconstructions using tibialis anterior or posterior allografts and 50 ACL reconstructions using hamstring autografts. Facility direct cost, reimbursement rates, gross contribution margin, OR times, and other variables were compared.
RESULTS: The facility mean direct cost for ACL reconstruction using allografts was $4,587, with a mean OR time of 92 minutes. The mean direct cost and OR time for ACL reconstruction using autografts were $3,849 and 125 minutes, respectively. Allograft ACL reconstructions were $738 more costly, and reimbursement was also higher. Allograft ACL reconstruction produced a 41.5% margin with a gross contribution margin of $3,248, whereas autografts had a reimbursement rate with a 45% margin with a gross contribution margin of $3,156.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study the cost of allograft tissue used in ACL reconstruction was not offset by the savings realized from shorter OR and recovery room times. However, in a hospital-based outpatient setting, reimbursement covered the cost of the allograft, offsetting the additional expense. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study for economic analysis.
Copyright © 2012 Arthroscopy Association of North America. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22951373     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  11 in total

1.  Variance in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Selection based on Patient Demographics and Location within the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network Cohort.

Authors:  Darby A Houck; Matthew J Kraeutler; Armando F Vidal; Eric C McCarty; Jonathan T Bravman; Michelle L Wolcott
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  Hamstring autograft maturation is superior to tibialis allograft following anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Sang-Gyun Kim; Soo-Hyun Kim; Jae-Gyoon Kim; Ki-Mo Jang; Hong-Chul Lim; Ji-Hoon Bae
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Effect of a novel sterilization method on biomechanical properties of soft tissue allografts.

Authors:  T Baldini; K Caperton; M Hawkins; E McCarty
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Hamstring tendon autograft versus fresh-frozen tibialis posterior allograft in primary arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study with three to six years follow-up.

Authors:  Mohsen Mardani-Kivi; Mahmoud Karimi-Mobarakeh; Sohrab Keyhani; Khashayar Saheb-Ekhtiari; Keyvan Hashemi-Motlagh; Ali Sarvi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Does the Utilization of Allograft Tissue in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients Restore Patellar Stability?

Authors:  Eric Hohn; Nirav K Pandya
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Allografts in soft tissue reconstructive procedures: important considerations.

Authors:  Andrius Giedraitis; Steven P Arnoczky; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.843

7.  Cost-utility analysis of dynamic intraligamentary stabilization versus early reconstruction after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Martin Bierbaum; Oliver Schöffski; Benedikt Schliemann; Clemens Kösters
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2017-02-06

8.  Patient- and Procedure-Specific Variables Driving Total Direct Costs of Outpatient Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael R Karns; Daniel L Jones; Dane C Todd; Travis G Maak; Stephen K Aoki; Robert T Burks; Minkyoung Yoo; Richard E Nelson; Patrick E Greis
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-08-06

Review 9.  Comparable outcome for autografts and allografts in primary medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellofemoral instability: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Andromahi Trivellas; Jörg Eschweiler; Matthias Knobe; Markus Tingart; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Health Economic Evaluations of Hip and Knee Interventions in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Codie A Primeau; Bryn O Zomar; Lyndsay E Somerville; Ishita Joshi; J Robert Giffin; Jacquelyn D Marsh
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.