T Baldini1, K Caperton2, M Hawkins3, E McCarty2. 1. University of Colorado, Denver, 13001 E. 17th Place, MSF432, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. Todd.Baldini@UCDenver.edu. 2. University of Colorado, Denver, 13001 E. 17th Place, MSF432, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. 3. Stryker Joint Preservation, Mahwah, NJ, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Evaluate allograft tissue commonly used in soft tissue reconstruction to determine whether stiffness and strength were significantly altered after grafts were treated with different sterilization methods. Unprocessed, irradiated, and grafts treated with supercritical CO2 were compared. METHODS: Thirty-eight anterior or posterior tibialis tendons were obtained from a tissue bank (Allograft Innovations, Gainesville, FL). Group I was unprocessed, group II was sterilized with gamma irradiation (20-28 kGy), and group III was sterilized with supercritical CO2. The grafts were pretensioned to 89 N for 300 s. Specimens were then loaded from 50 to 300 N at 0.5 Hz for 250 cycles before being loaded to failure at 50 mm/min. Dependent variables were compared between sterilization groups with one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05) and equivalence trial. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in load to failure or failure stress among groups I, II, and III. Group III resulted in 27-36 % lower stiffness than group I and II. This difference was significant at 1, 10, 50, 100, and 250 cycles. There was no significant difference in stiffness between group I and group II. CONCLUSION: The two sterilization methods tested in this study do not affect allograft strength. The supercritical CO2 sterilization method resulted in significantly lower stiffness than unprocessed and irradiated allografts. However, the stiffness and strength of all groups tested were greater than that of published values of the native intact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). This study provides previously unpublished mechanical test data on a new sterilization technique that will assist surgeons to decide which allograft to use in ACL reconstruction surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: Evaluate allograft tissue commonly used in soft tissue reconstruction to determine whether stiffness and strength were significantly altered after grafts were treated with different sterilization methods. Unprocessed, irradiated, and grafts treated with supercritical CO2 were compared. METHODS: Thirty-eight anterior or posterior tibialis tendons were obtained from a tissue bank (Allograft Innovations, Gainesville, FL). Group I was unprocessed, group II was sterilized with gamma irradiation (20-28 kGy), and group III was sterilized with supercritical CO2. The grafts were pretensioned to 89 N for 300 s. Specimens were then loaded from 50 to 300 N at 0.5 Hz for 250 cycles before being loaded to failure at 50 mm/min. Dependent variables were compared between sterilization groups with one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05) and equivalence trial. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in load to failure or failure stress among groups I, II, and III. Group III resulted in 27-36 % lower stiffness than group I and II. This difference was significant at 1, 10, 50, 100, and 250 cycles. There was no significant difference in stiffness between group I and group II. CONCLUSION: The two sterilization methods tested in this study do not affect allograft strength. The supercritical CO2 sterilization method resulted in significantly lower stiffness than unprocessed and irradiated allografts. However, the stiffness and strength of all groups tested were greater than that of published values of the native intact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). This study provides previously unpublished mechanical test data on a new sterilization technique that will assist surgeons to decide which allograft to use in ACL reconstruction surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Tanja Schmidt; Arnd Hoburg; Christine Broziat; Mark D Smith; Uwe Gohs; Axel Pruss; Sven Scheffler Journal: Cell Tissue Bank Date: 2012-02-05 Impact factor: 1.522
Authors: Adam B Yanke; Rebecca Bell; Andrew Lee; Richard W Kang; Richard C Mather; Elizabeth F Shewman; Vincent M Wang; Bernard R Bach Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Anne Bernhardt; Markus Wehrl; Birgit Paul; Thomas Hochmuth; Matthias Schumacher; Kathleen Schütz; Michael Gelinsky Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 3.240