Literature DB >> 22949492

Five-year clinical and economic outcomes among patients with medically managed severe aortic stenosis: results from a Medicare claims analysis.

Mary Ann Clark1, Suzanne V Arnold, Francis G Duhay, Ann K Thompson, Michelle J Keyes, Lars G Svensson, Robert O Bonow, Benjamin T Stockwell, David J Cohen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis, who do not undergo valve replacement surgery have a poor long-term prognosis. Limited data exist on the medical resource utilization and costs during the final stages of the disease. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We used data from the 2003 Medicare 5% standard analytic files to identify patients with aortic stenosis and a recent hospitalization for heart failure, who did not undergo valve replacement surgery within the ensuing 2 calendar quarters. These patients (n=2150) were considered to have medically managed severe aortic stenosis and were tracked over 5 years to measure clinical outcomes, medical resource use, and costs (from the perspective of the Medicare Program). The mean age of the cohort was 82 years, 64% were female, and the estimated logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) (a measure of predicted mortality with cardiac surgery) was 17%. During 5 years of follow-up, overall mortality was 88.4% with a mean survival duration of 1.8 years. During this time period, patients experienced an average of 4.4 hospital admissions, 52% were admitted to skilled nursing care, and 28% were admitted to hospice care. The total 5-year costs were $63 844 per patient, whereas mean annual follow-up costs (excluding the index quarter) per year alive were $29 278.
CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing medical management have limited long-term survival and incur substantial costs to the Medicare Program. These results have important implications for policy makers interested in better understanding the cost-effectiveness of emerging treatment options such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22949492     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.966002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  21 in total

1.  Cost and contribution margin of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Fenton H McCarthy; Danielle C Savino; Chase R Brown; Joseph E Bavaria; Vinay Kini; Danielle D Spragan; Taylor R Dibble; Howard C Herrmann; Saif Anwaruddin; Jay Giri; Wilson Y Szeto; Peter W Groeneveld; Nimesh D Desai
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Outcomes for Low-Risk Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Benchmark for Aortic Valve Technology.

Authors:  Lily E Johnston; Emily A Downs; Robert B Hawkins; Mohammed A Quader; Alan M Speir; Jeffrey B Rich; Ravi K Ghanta; Leora T Yarboro; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-06-11       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  Risk factors for valvular calcification.

Authors:  Hao Yu Chen; James C Engert; George Thanassoulis
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 4.  Palliative care in end-stage valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Jill M Steiner; Stephanie Cooper; James N Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Innate and adaptive immunity: the understudied driving force of heart valve disease.

Authors:  Francesca Bartoli-Leonard; Jonas Zimmer; Elena Aikawa
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 10.787

6.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Moderate-risk Aortic Stenosis Patients.

Authors:  Lars G Svensson
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2014-03

7.  Episode Payments for Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Parth K Modi; Devraj A Sukul; Mary Oerline; Michael P Thompson; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Chad Ellimoottil; Vahakn B Shahinian; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-12-13

Review 8.  Genetic and Developmental Contributors to Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Punashi Dutta; Jeanne F James; Hail Kazik; Joy Lincoln
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 9.  Multi-Omics Approaches to Define Calcific Aortic Valve Disease Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Mark C Blaser; Simon Kraler; Thomas F Lüscher; Elena Aikawa
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Unveiling transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis and its predictors among elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Adam Castaño; David L Narotsky; Nadira Hamid; Omar K Khalique; Rachelle Morgenstern; Albert DeLuca; Jonah Rubin; Codruta Chiuzan; Tamim Nazif; Torsten Vahl; Isaac George; Susheel Kodali; Martin B Leon; Rebecca Hahn; Sabahat Bokhari; Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.