Literature DB >> 28610884

Outcomes for Low-Risk Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Benchmark for Aortic Valve Technology.

Lily E Johnston1, Emily A Downs1, Robert B Hawkins1, Mohammed A Quader2, Alan M Speir3, Jeffrey B Rich4, Ravi K Ghanta1, Leora T Yarboro1, Gorav Ailawadi5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two large, randomized trials are underway evaluating transcatheter aortic valve replacement (AVR) against conventional surgical AVR. We analyzed contemporary, real-world outcomes of surgical AVR in low-risk patients to provide a practical benchmark of outcomes and cost for evaluating current and future transapical AVR technology.
METHODS: From 2010 to 2015, 2,505 isolated AVR operations were performed for severe aortic stenosis at 18 statewide cardiac institutions. Of these, 2,138 patients had a Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality of less than 4%, and 1,119 met other clinical and hemodynamic criteria as outlined in the PARTNER 3 (The Placement of Transcatheter Aortic Valves) protocol. Patients with endocarditis, end-stage renal disease, ejection fraction of less than 0.45, bicuspid valves, and previous valve replacements were excluded. Outcomes of interest included operative death and postoperative adverse events.
RESULTS: The median Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality for the study-eligible patients was 1.44%, with a median age of 72 years (interquartile range [IQR], 65 to 78 years). Operative mortality was 1.3%, permanent stroke was 1.3%, and pacemaker requirement was 4.2%. The most common adverse events were transfusion of 2 or more units of red blood cells (18%) and atrial fibrillation (28%). The median length of stay was 6 days (IQR, 5 to 8 days). Median total hospital cost was $37,999 (IQR, $30,671 to $46,138). Examination of complications by age younger than 65 vs 65 or older demonstrated a significantly lower need for transfusion (11.2%, p < 0.001) and incidence of atrial fibrillation (17.1%, p < 0.001) but no difference in operative mortality (2.2% vs 0.9%, p = 0.1), major morbidity (10.4% vs 12.6%, p = 0.3), or total hospital costs.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-risk patients undergoing surgical AVR in the current era have excellent results. The most common complications were atrial fibrillation and bleeding. These real-world results should provide additional context for upcoming transcatheter clinical trial data.
Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28610884      PMCID: PMC5610058          DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.03.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  15 in total

Review 1.  The Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve (PARTNER) trial: a health economic and policy perspective.

Authors:  Daniel B Mark; Robert J Mentz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard care among inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis: results from the placement of aortic transcatheter valves (PARTNER) trial (Cohort B).

Authors:  Matthew R Reynolds; Elizabeth A Magnuson; Kaijun Wang; Yang Lei; Katherine Vilain; Joshua Walczak; Susheel K Kodali; John M Lasala; William W O'Neill; Charles J Davidson; Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; David J Cohen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement: the potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk.

Authors:  David S Bach; Derrick Siao; Steven E Girard; Claire Duvernoy; Benjamin D McCallister; Sarah K Gualano
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2009-10-27

4.  Additive costs of postoperative complications for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting patients in Virginia.

Authors:  Alan M Speir; Vigneshwar Kasirajan; Scott D Barnett; Edwin Fonner
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 5.  A comprehensive review of the PARTNER trial.

Authors:  Lars G Svensson; Murat Tuzcu; Samir Kapadia; Eugene H Blackstone; Eric E Roselli; A Marc Gillinov; Joseph F Sabik; Bruce W Lytle
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Blood product conservation is associated with improved outcomes and reduced costs after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Damien J LaPar; Ivan K Crosby; Gorav Ailawadi; Niv Ad; Elmer Choi; Bruce D Spiess; Jeffery B Rich; Vigneshwar Kasirajan; Edwin Fonner; Irving L Kron; Alan M Speir
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Contemporary Costs Associated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Cost Analysis.

Authors:  Gorav Ailawadi; Damien J LaPar; Alan M Speir; Ravi K Ghanta; Leora T Yarboro; Ivan K Crosby; D Scott Lim; Mohammed A Quader; Jeffrey B Rich
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Contemporary real-world outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in 141,905 low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients.

Authors:  Vinod H Thourani; Rakesh M Suri; Rebecca L Gunter; Shubin Sheng; Sean M O'Brien; Gorav Ailawadi; Wilson Y Szeto; Todd M Dewey; Robert A Guyton; Joseph E Bavaria; Vasilis Babaliaros; James S Gammie; Lars Svensson; Mathew Williams; Vinay Badhwar; Michael J Mack
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Five-year clinical and economic outcomes among patients with medically managed severe aortic stenosis: results from a Medicare claims analysis.

Authors:  Mary Ann Clark; Suzanne V Arnold; Francis G Duhay; Ann K Thompson; Michelle J Keyes; Lars G Svensson; Robert O Bonow; Benjamin T Stockwell; David J Cohen
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-09-04

10.  Long-term survival after surgical aortic valve replacement among patients over 65 years of age.

Authors:  Mansour T A Sharabiani; Francesca Fiorentino; Gianni D Angelini; Nishith N Patel
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2016-03-25
View more
  1 in total

1.  Cost-utility of surgical sutureless bioprostheses vs TAVI in aortic valve replacement for patients at intermediate and high surgical risk.

Authors:  Massimiliano Povero; Antonio Miceli; Lorenzo Pradelli; Matteo Ferrarini; Matteo Pinciroli; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-11-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.