Literature DB >> 22947431

Comparison of whole-body post mortem 3D CT and autopsy evaluation in accidental blunt force traumatic death using the abbreviated injury scale classification.

Barry Daly1, Samir Abboud, Zabiullah Ali, Clint Sliker, David Fowler.   

Abstract

Although 3D CT imaging data are available on survivors of accidental blunt trauma, little similar data has been collected and classified on major injuries in victims of fatal injuries. This study compared the sensitivity of post mortem computed tomography (PMCT) with that of conventional autopsy for major trauma findings classified according to the trauma Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). Whole-body 3D PMCT imaging data and full autopsy findings were analyzed on 21 victims of accidental blunt force trauma death. All major injuries were classified on the AIS scale with ratings from 3 (serious) to 6 (unsurvivable). Agreement between sensitivity of autopsy and PMCT for major injuries was determined. A total of 195 major injuries were detected (mean per fatality, 9.3; range, 1-14). Skeletal injuries by AIS grade included 37 grade 3, 45 grade 4, 12 grade 5, and 2 grade 6 major findings. Soft tissue injuries included 10 grade 3, 68 grade 4, 16 grade 5, and 5 grade 6 major findings. Of these, PMCT detected 165 (88 skeletal, 77 soft tissue), and autopsy detected 127 (59 skeletal, 68 soft tissue). PMCT agreed with autopsy in 86% and 76% of skeletal and soft tissue injuries, respectively. PMCT detected an additional 37 skeletal and 31 soft tissue injuries that were not identified at autopsy. Autopsy detected 8 skeletal and 22 soft tissue injuries that were not detected by PMCT. PMCT was more sensitive for skeletal (P=0.05) and head and neck region injury (P=0.043) detection. PMCT showed a trend for greater sensitivity than autopsy, but this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.083). 3D PMCT detected significantly more skeletal injuries than autopsy and a similar number of soft tissue injuries to autopsy and promises to be a sensitive tool for detection and classification of skeletal injuries in fatal blunt force accidental trauma. Use of the AIS scale allows standardized categorization and quantification of injuries that contribute to death in such cases and allows more objective comparison between autopsy and PMCT.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22947431     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  10 in total

Review 1.  Postmortem-computed tomography and postmortem-computed tomography-angiography: a focused update.

Authors:  Francesco Paolo Busardò; Paola Frati; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Giampaolo Grilli; Antonio Pinto; Antonio Rotondo; Valeria Panebianco; Vittorio Fineschi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  An exploratory study toward the contribution of 3D surface scanning for association of an injury with its causing instrument.

Authors:  Stella Fahrni; Olivier Delémont; Lorenzo Campana; Silke Grabherr
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Accuracy of non-contrast PMCT for determining cause of death.

Authors:  Garyfalia Ampanozi; Yannick A Thali; Wolf Schweitzer; Gary M Hatch; Lars C Ebert; Michael J Thali; Thomas D Ruder
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 4.  Imaging in forensic radiology: an illustrated guide for postmortem computed tomography technique and protocols.

Authors:  Patricia M Flach; Dominic Gascho; Wolf Schweitzer; Thomas D Ruder; Nicole Berger; Steffen G Ross; Michael J Thali; Garyfalia Ampanozi
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.007

5.  Performance of post-mortem CT compared to autopsy in children.

Authors:  Beatriz V Krentz; Leonor Alamo; Jochen Grimm; Fabrice Dédouit; Christine Bruguier; Christine Chevallier; Coraline Egger; Luiz F F Da Silva; Silke Grabherr
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Postmortem imaging findings and cause of death determination compared with autopsy: a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Garyfalia Ampanozi; Delaja Halbheer; Lars C Ebert; Michael J Thali; Ulrike Held
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 7.  Sensitivity and specificity of post-mortem computed tomography in skull fracture detection-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mikkel Jon Henningsen; Sara Tangmose Larsen; Christina Jacobsen; Chiara Villa
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.791

8.  Fractures of the neuro-cranium: sensitivity and specificity of post-mortem computed tomography compared with autopsy.

Authors:  Mikkel Jon Henningsen; Mette Lønstrup Harving; Christina Jacobsen; Chiara Villa
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.791

9.  Immediate non-traumatic postmortem computed tomographic demonstration of myocardial intravascular gas of the left ventricle: effects from cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Takahisa Okuda; Seiji Shiotani; Tomoya Kobayashi; Mototsugu Kohno; Hideyuki Hayakawa; Kazunori Kikuchi; Kunio Suwa
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-03-07

Review 10.  State of the art in post-mortem forensic imaging in China.

Authors:  Yijiu Chen
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2017-06-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.