Literature DB >> 35286468

Sensitivity and specificity of post-mortem computed tomography in skull fracture detection-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mikkel Jon Henningsen1, Sara Tangmose Larsen2, Christina Jacobsen2, Chiara Villa2.   

Abstract

Post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) has been increasingly used as routine examination in forensic pathology. No recent review of the growing number of papers on the ability of PMCT to detect skull fracture exists, and original papers report sensitivities from 0.85 to 1.00. This systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42021233264) aims to provide a meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity of PMCT in skull fracture detection. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase for papers published between January 2000 and August 2021 reporting raw numbers, sensitivity and specificity or Abbreviated Injury Score for PMCT compared to autopsy. Papers without both PMCT and autopsy, no separate reporting of the neuro-cranium, exclusively on children, sharp trauma, gunshot or natural death as well as case reports and reviews were excluded. Two authors independently performed inclusion, bias assessment and data extraction. QUADAS-2 was used for bias assessment and a random effects models used for meta-analysis. From 4.284 hits, 18 studies were eligible and 13 included in the meta-analysis for a total of 1538 cases. All deceased were scanned on multi-slice scanners with comparable parameters. Images were evaluated by radiologists or pathologists. Intra- and inter-observer analyses were rarely reported. In summary, sensitivity of PMCT for detection of fractures in the skull base was 0.87 [0.80; 0.92] with specificity 0.96 [0.90; 0.98], and sensitivity for the vault was 0.89 [0.80; 0.94] with specificity 0.96 [0.91; 0.98]. The mixed samples are a limitation of the review.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autopsy; Fracture detection; Meta-analysis; PMCT; Review; Skull

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35286468     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-022-02803-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.791


  27 in total

1.  Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey.

Authors:  R Brian Haynes; Nancy L Wilczynski
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-08

2.  PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.

Authors:  Matthew J Page; David Moher; Patrick M Bossuyt; Isabelle Boutron; Tammy C Hoffmann; Cynthia D Mulrow; Larissa Shamseer; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Elie A Akl; Sue E Brennan; Roger Chou; Julie Glanville; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Manoj M Lalu; Tianjing Li; Elizabeth W Loder; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Steve McDonald; Luke A McGuinness; Lesley A Stewart; James Thomas; Andrea C Tricco; Vivian A Welch; Penny Whiting; Joanne E McKenzie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-03-29

3.  Craniocerebral trauma--congruence between post-mortem computed tomography diagnoses and autopsy results: a 2-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Christina Jacobsen; Niels Lynnerup
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 4.  Post-mortem imaging compared with autopsy in trauma victims--A systematic review.

Authors:  Hamid Jalalzadeh; Georgios F Giannakopoulos; Ferco H Berger; Judith Fronczek; Frank R W van de Goot; Udo J Reijnders; Wietse P Zuidema
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Post-mortem computed tomography compared to forensic autopsy findings: a French experience.

Authors:  Isabelle Le Blanc-Louvry; Sophie Thureau; Cathia Duval; Frédérique Papin-Lefebvre; Jacques Thiebot; Jean Nicolas Dacher; Cyril Gricourt; Emmanuel Touré; Bernard Proust
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  [A computer-tomographical examination of cranial bullet wounds (author's transl)].

Authors:  R Wüllenweber; V Schneider; T Grumme
Journal:  Z Rechtsmed       Date:  1977-11-18

7.  Comparison of whole-body post mortem 3D CT and autopsy evaluation in accidental blunt force traumatic death using the abbreviated injury scale classification.

Authors:  Barry Daly; Samir Abboud; Zabiullah Ali; Clint Sliker; David Fowler
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 8.  Non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy compared to conventional autopsy of suspected natural deaths in adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Britt M Blokker; Ivo M Wagensveld; Annick C Weustink; J Wolter Oosterhuis; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet; Herbert Y Kressel; Nader Rifai; Robert M Golub; Douglas G Altman; Lotty Hooft; Daniël A Korevaar; Jérémie F Cohen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-10-28

Review 10.  The value of postmortem computed tomography as an alternative for autopsy in trauma victims: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Scholing; T P Saltzherr; P H P Fung Kon Jin; K J Ponsen; J B Reitsma; J S Lameris; J C Goslings
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.