Literature DB >> 22947240

Motor control retraining exercises for shoulder impingement: effects on function, muscle activation, and biomechanics in young adults.

Peter Worsley1, Martin Warner, Sarah Mottram, Stephan Gadola, H E J Veeger, Hermie Hermens, Dylan Morrissey, Paul Little, Cyrus Cooper, Andrew Carr, Maria Stokes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evidence for effective management of shoulder impingement is limited. The present study aimed to quantify the clinical, neurophysiological, and biomechanical effects of a scapular motor control retraining for young individuals with shoulder impingement signs.
METHOD: Sixteen adults with shoulder impingement signs (mean age 22 ± 1.6 years) underwent the intervention and 16 healthy participants (24.8 ± 3.1years) provided reference data. Shoulder function and pain were assessed using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and other questionnaires. Electromyography (EMG) and 3-dimensional motion analysis was used to record muscle activation and kinematic data during arm elevation to 90° and lowering in 3 planes. Patients were assessed pre and post a 10-week motor control based intervention, utilizing scapular orientation retraining.
RESULTS: Pre-intervention, patients reported pain and reduced function compared to the healthy participants (SPADI in patients 20 ± 9.2; healthy 0 ± 0). Post-intervention, the SPADI scores reduced significantly (P < .001) by a mean of 10 points (±4). EMG showed delayed onset and early termination of serratus anterior and lower trapezius muscle activity pre-intervention, which improved significantly post-intervention (P < .05). Pre-intervention, patients exhibited on average 4.6-7.4° less posterior tilt, which was significantly lower in 2 arm elevation planes (P < .05) than healthy participants. Post-intervention, upward rotation and posterior tilt increased significantly (P < .05) during 2 arm movements, approaching the healthy values.
CONCLUSION: A 10-week motor control intervention for shoulder impingement increased function and reduced pain. Recovery mechanisms were indicated by changes in muscle recruitment and scapular kinematics. The efficacy of the intervention requires further examined in a randomized control trial.
Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22947240      PMCID: PMC3654498          DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  45 in total

1.  Dynamic measurements of three-dimensional scapular kinematics: a validation study.

Authors:  A R Karduna; P W McClure; L A Michener; B Sennett
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures.

Authors:  H J Hermens; B Freriks; C Disselhorst-Klug; G Rau
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Immediate changes in feedforward postural adjustments following voluntary motor training.

Authors:  Henry Tsao; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Scapular muscle recruitment patterns and isokinetic strength ratios of the shoulder rotator muscles in individuals with and without impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Geraldo F S Moraes; Christina D C M Faria; Luci Fuscaldi Teixeira-Salmela
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Scapular behavior in shoulder impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Luc J Hébert; Hélène Moffet; Bradford J McFadyen; Clermont E Dionne
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Measuring scapular kinematics during arm lowering using the acromion marker cluster.

Authors:  M B Warner; P H Chappell; M J Stokes
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Prevalence and incidence of adults consulting for shoulder conditions in UK primary care; patterns of diagnosis and referral.

Authors:  L Linsell; J Dawson; K Zondervan; P Rose; T Randall; R Fitzpatrick; A Carr
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 7.580

9.  Effect of motor control and strengthening exercises on shoulder function in persons with impingement syndrome: a single-subject study design.

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Roy; Hélène Moffet; Luc J Hébert; Richard Lirette
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2008-03-20

10.  Measuring shoulder function with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index.

Authors:  J W Williams; D R Holleman; D L Simel
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.666

View more
  30 in total

1.  Stroke Patients' Acceptance of a Smart Garment for Supporting Upper Extremity Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Annick Timmermans; Wei Chen; Jie Jia; Li Ding; Li Xiong; Jifeng Rong; Panos Markopoulos
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.316

Review 2.  Electromyographic activity of the shoulder muscles during rehabilitation exercises in subjects with and without subacromial pain syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rita Kinsella; Tania Pizzari
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-08-13

3.  Single-Session Video and Electromyography Feedback in Overhead Athletes With Scapular Dyskinesis and Impingement Syndrome.

Authors:  Wan-Yu Du; Tsun-Shun Huang; Yuan-Chun Chiu; Szu-Jieh Mao; Li-Wei Hung; Mei-Fang Liu; Jing Lan Yang; Jiu-Jenq Lin
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Intra and inter-rater reliability of screening for movement impairments: movement control tests from the foundation matrix.

Authors:  Carolina R Mischiati; Mark Comerford; Emma Gosford; Jacqueline Swart; Sean Ewings; Nadine Botha; Maria Stokes; Sarah L Mottram
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Shoulder muscle activity during the modified dynamic relocation test and side-lying shoulder external rotation: a cross-sectional study on asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Daniel Cury Ribeiro; Jonathan Shemmell; Carrie Falling; Gisela Sole
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-12

6.  Measurement of dynamic scapular kinematics using an acromion marker cluster to minimize skin movement artifact.

Authors:  Martin B Warner; Paul H Chappell; Maria J Stokes
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Therapeutic Interventions for Scapular Kinematics and Disability in Patients With Subacromial Impingement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katsumi Takeno; Neal R Glaviano; Grant E Norte; Christopher D Ingersoll
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Shoulder impingement syndrome: a systematic review of clinical trial participant selection criteria.

Authors:  Amy R Watts; Ben Williams; Susan W Kim; Donald C Bramwell; Jeganath Krishnan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-08-20

9.  Four-week exercise program does not change rotator cuff muscle activation and scapular kinematics in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Yin-Liang Lin; Andrew Karduna
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 10.  Screening of the cervical spine in subacromial shoulder pain: A systematic review.

Authors:  Tom Walker; Emma Salt; Greg Lynch; Chris Littlewood
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-09-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.