Literature DB >> 25742242

Measurement of dynamic scapular kinematics using an acromion marker cluster to minimize skin movement artifact.

Martin B Warner1, Paul H Chappell2, Maria J Stokes3.   

Abstract

The measurement of dynamic scapular kinematics is complex due to the sliding nature of the scapula beneath the skin surface. The aim of the study was to clearly describe the acromion marker cluster (AMC) method of determining scapular kinematics when using a passive marker motion capture system, with consideration for the sources of error which could affect the validity and reliability of measurements. The AMC method involves placing a cluster of markers over the posterior acromion, and through calibration of anatomical landmarks with respect to the marker cluster it is possible to obtain valid measurements of scapular kinematics. The reliability of the method was examined between two days in a group of 15 healthy individuals (aged 19-38 years, eight males) as they performed arm elevation, to 120°, and lowering in the frontal, scapular and sagittal planes. Results showed that between-day reliability was good for upward scapular rotation (Coefficient of Multiple Correlation; CMC = 0.92) and posterior tilt (CMC = 0.70) but fair for internal rotation (CMC = 0.53) during the arm elevation phase. The waveform error was lower for upward rotation (2.7° to 4.4°) and posterior tilt (1.3° to 2.8°), compared to internal rotation (5.4° to 7.3°). The reliability during the lowering phase was comparable to results observed during the elevation phase. If the protocol outlined in this study is adhered to, the AMC provides a reliable measurement of upward rotation and posterior tilt during the elevation and lowering phases of arm movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25742242      PMCID: PMC4354629          DOI: 10.3791/51717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  40 in total

1.  The position of the rotation center of the glenohumeral joint.

Authors:  H E Veeger
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Comparison between tripod and skin-fixed recording of scapular motion.

Authors:  Carel G M Meskers; Michiel A J van de Sande; Jurriaan H de Groot
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  A method for the measurement of three-dimensional scapular movement.

Authors:  G R Johnson; P R Stuart; S Mitchell
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Dynamic scapulohumeral rhythm: the effects of external resistance during elevation of the arm in the scapular plane.

Authors:  K J McQuade; G L Smidt
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Reliability of goniometric measurements of active arm elevation in the scapular plane obtained in a clinical setting.

Authors:  J W Youdas; J R Carey; T R Garrett; V J Suman
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Influence of age on scapulo-thoracic orientation.

Authors:  Kenji Endo; Kiminori Yukata; Natsuo Yasui
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 7.  Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement.

Authors:  P M Ludewig; T M Cook
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2000-03

8.  Shoulder function and 3-dimensional kinematics in people with shoulder impingement syndrome before and after a 6-week exercise program.

Authors:  Philip W McClure; Jason Bialker; Nancy Neff; Gerald Williams; Andrew Karduna
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2004-09

9.  Motion of the shoulder complex during multiplanar humeral elevation.

Authors:  Paula M Ludewig; Vandana Phadke; Jonathan P Braman; Daniel R Hassett; Cort J Cieminski; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  In vivo assessment of scapulohumeral rhythm during unconstrained overhead reaching in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Jonathan P Braman; Sean C Engel; Robert F Laprade; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  10 in total

1.  Therapeutic Interventions for Scapular Kinematics and Disability in Patients With Subacromial Impingement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katsumi Takeno; Neal R Glaviano; Grant E Norte; Christopher D Ingersoll
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Statistical Quantification of the Effects of Marker Misplacement and Soft-Tissue Artifact on Shoulder Kinematics and Kinetics.

Authors:  Maxence Lavaill; Saulo Martelli; Graham K Kerr; Peter Pivonka
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Crank fore-aft position alters the distribution of work over the push and pull phase during synchronous recumbent handcycling of able-bodied participants.

Authors:  Riemer J K Vegter; Barry S Mason; Bastiaan Sporrel; Benjamin Stone; Lucas H V van der Woude; Vicky L Goosey-Tolfrey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Shoulder and thorax kinematics contribute to increased power output of competitive handcyclists.

Authors:  Benjamin Stone; Barry S Mason; Martin B Warner; Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Current Views of Scapular Dyskinesis and its Possible Clinical Relevance.

Authors:  Aaron Sciascia; W Ben Kibler
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-02-02

6.  Three-dimensional alignment of the upper extremity in the standing neutral position in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Yuki Yoshida; Noboru Matsumura; Yoshitake Yamada; Satoshi Hiraga; Kazunori Ishii; Satoshi Oki; Yoichi Yokoyama; Minoru Yamada; Masaya Nakamura; Takeo Nagura; Masahiro Jinzaki
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.677

7.  Three-Dimensional Quantitative Evaluation of the Scapular Skin Marker Movements in the Upright Posture.

Authors:  Yuki Yoshida; Noboru Matsumura; Yoshitake Yamada; Minoru Yamada; Yoichi Yokoyama; Azusa Miyamoto; Masaya Nakamura; Takeo Nagura; Masahiro Jinzaki
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 8.  Optical Motion Capture Systems for 3D Kinematic Analysis in Patients with Shoulder Disorders.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Sergio De Salvatore; Arianna Carnevale; Salvatore Maria Tecce; Benedetta Bandini; Alberto Lalli; Emiliano Schena; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Alterations in shoulder kinematics are associated with shoulder pain during wheelchair propulsion sprints.

Authors:  Simon J Briley; Riemer J K Vegter; Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey; Barry S Mason
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 4.645

10.  A New Skeleton Model and the Motion Rhythm Analysis for Human Shoulder Complex Oriented to Rehabilitation Robotics.

Authors:  Song Zhibin; Ma Tianyu; Nie Chao; Niu Yijun
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 1.781

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.