Literature DB >> 22946809

Deficiency screening for genomic regions with effects on environmental sensitivity of the sensory bristles of Drosophila melanogaster.

Kazuo H Takahashi1, Yasukazu Okada, Kouhei Teramura.   

Abstract

Environmental canalization is defined as a reduction in the effect of external environmental perturbations on a phenotype, while phenotypic plasticity is defined as the production of different phenotypes in alternative environments. These terms describe different aspects of the same phenomenon, that is, the sensitivity of the phenotype to the environment. Genetic regulation of the environmental sensitivity has been a central topic in the field of evolutionary biology. In this study, we performed deficiency screening to detect genomic regions with effects on the environmental sensitivity of Drosophila melanogaster sensory bristles. We used a collection of isogenic deficiency strains established by the DrosDel Project for screening. We screened 423 genomic deficiencies that encompassed approximately 63.6% of the entire D. melanogaster genome. We identified 29 genomic deficiencies showing significant effects on environmental sensitivity, suggesting that multiple genomic regions may influence phenotypic variation. We also found significant correlations among the effects of deficiencies on environmental sensitivity for different bristle traits, suggesting that the same genetic mechanism can regulate environmental sensitivity of multiple traits. Current high-resolution mapping will facilitate the examination of individual candidate genes using mutations or RNAi approaches in future studies.
© 2012 The Author(s). Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22946809     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01636.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  8 in total

Review 1.  The developmental genetics of biological robustness.

Authors:  Lamia Mestek Boukhibar; Michalis Barkoulas
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 2.  Pervasive robustness in biological systems.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Félix; Michalis Barkoulas
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  On the Nature and Evolutionary Impact of Phenotypic Robustness Mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark L Siegal; Jun-Yi Leu
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 13.915

4.  Little effect of HSP90 inhibition on the quantitative wing traits variation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kazuo H Takahashi
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Long-term evolution of quantitative traits in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.

Authors:  Amir Yassin; Nelly Gidaszewski; Vincent Debat; Jean R David
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 1.633

6.  The details in the distributions: why and how to study phenotypic variability.

Authors:  K A Geiler-Samerotte; C R Bauer; S Li; N Ziv; D Gresham; M L Siegal
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 9.740

7.  A sibling method for identifying vQTLs.

Authors:  Dalton Conley; Rebecca Johnson; Ben Domingue; Christopher Dawes; Jason Boardman; Mark L Siegal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Stochastic loss and gain of symmetric divisions in the C. elegans epidermis perturbs robustness of stem cell number.

Authors:  Dimitris Katsanos; Sneha L Koneru; Lamia Mestek Boukhibar; Nicola Gritti; Ritobrata Ghose; Peter J Appleford; Maria Doitsidou; Alison Woollard; Jeroen S van Zon; Richard J Poole; Michalis Barkoulas
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 8.029

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.