Literature DB >> 7990218

The impact of serious illness on patients' families. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.

K E Covinsky1, L Goldman, E F Cook, R Oye, N Desbiens, D Reding, W Fulkerson, A F Connors, J Lynn, R S Phillips.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of illness on the families of seriously ill adults and to determine the correlates of adverse economic impact.
DESIGN: Data were collected during the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment (SUPPORT), a prospective cohort study of outcomes, preferences, and decision making in seriously ill hospitalized adults and their families.
SETTING: Five tertiary care hospitals in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: The 2661 seriously ill patients in nine diagnostic categories who survived their index hospitalization and were discharged home were eligible for this analysis. Surrogate and/or patient interviews about the impact of illness on the family were obtained for 2129 (80%) of these patients (mean age, 62 years; 43% women; 6-month survival, 75%). OUTCOME MEASURES: Surrogates and patients were surveyed to determine the frequency of adverse caregiving and economic burdens. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine correlates of loss of family savings.
RESULTS: One third (34%) of patients required considerable caregiving assistance from a family member. In 20% of cases, a family member had to quit work or make another major life change to provide care for the patient. Loss of most or all of the family savings was reported by 31% of families, whereas 29% reported loss of the major source of income. Patient factors independently associated with loss of the family's savings on multivariable analysis included poor functional status (odds ratio [OR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10 to 1.78 for patients needing assistance with three or more activities of daily living), lower family income (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.21 for those with annual incomes below $25,000), and young age (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 2.13 to 3.82 for those younger than 45 years compared with those 65 years or older).
CONCLUSIONS: Many families of seriously ill patients experience severe caregiving and financial burdens. Families of younger, poorer, and more functionally dependent patients are most likely to report loss of most or all of the family's savings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7990218     DOI: 10.1001/jama.272.23.1839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  91 in total

1.  When does primary care turn into palliative care?

Authors:  A L Back; J R Curtis
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-09

2.  National estimates of out-of-pocket health care expenditure burdens among nonelderly adults with cancer: 2001 to 2008.

Authors:  Didem S M Bernard; Stacy L Farr; Zhengyi Fang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  The lack of effect of market structure on hospice use.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna; Virginia W Chang; James X Zhang; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  When All Else Is Done: The Challenge of Improving Antemortem Care.

Authors:  W Clay Jackson
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1999-10

Review 5.  [Decision conflicts with relatives in the intensive care unit].

Authors:  M Ratliff; J-O Neumann
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 0.840

6.  Emotion regulation therapy for cancer caregivers-an open trial of a mechanism-targeted approach to addressing caregiver distress.

Authors:  Allison J Applebaum; Aliza A Panjwani; Kara Buda; Mia S O'Toole; Michael A Hoyt; Adam Garcia; David M Fresco; Douglas S Mennin
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 7.  Setting the vision: applied patient-reported outcomes and smart, connected digital healthcare systems to improve patient-centered outcomes prediction in critical illness.

Authors:  Nicholas G Wysham; Amy P Abernethy; Christopher E Cox
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.687

8.  Caring for elderly people at home: the consequences to caregivers.

Authors:  E Grunfeld; R Glossop; I McDowell; C Danbrook
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  The stroke caregiver unmet resource needs scale: development and psychometric testing.

Authors:  Rosemarie B King; Robert J Hartke; Jungwha Lee; Jason Raad
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.230

10.  Hospice enrollment saves money for Medicare and improves care quality across a number of different lengths-of-stay.

Authors:  Amy S Kelley; Partha Deb; Qingling Du; Melissa D Aldridge Carlson; R Sean Morrison
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.301

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.