| Literature DB >> 32917918 |
Selouka Mint Abdelaziz1,2, Leila Medraoui1, Mohammed Alami1, Ouafae Pakhrou1, Meryem Makkaoui1, Ali Ould Mohamed Salem Boukhary2, Abdelkarim Filali-Maltouf3.
Abstract
Drought and desertification are the major environmental constraints facing the Sahelian agro-ecosystems for decades. Assessing genetic diversity of native tree species is critical to assist ecosystems restoration efforts. Here we describe genetic diversity and structure of seven Balanites aegyptiaca L. natural populations distributed across the Sahelian-Saharan zone of Mauritania using 16 polymorphic ISSR primers. These generated 505 polymorphic bands. Polymorphism information content (PIC) varied from (0.13-0.29) with an average 0.23, marker index (MI) averaged 7.3 (range 3.3-10.3) and resolving power (RP) ranged from (4.53-14.6) with an average 9.9. The number of observed alleles (Na) ranged from (0.62-1.39), Effective number of alleles (Ne) varied from (1.26-1.37), Shannon's information index (I) ranged from (0.25-0.36). AMOVA analysis showed that 80% of the genetic variation was fined within populations, which is supported by a low level of genetic differentiation between population (GST = 0.21) and an overall estimate of gene flow among populations (Nm = 1.9). The dendrogram based on Jaccard's similarity coefficient and the structure analysis divided the seven populations into two main clusters in which two populations from the Saharan zone were grouped. Our results provide baseline data for genetic conservation programs of this Sahelian neglected crop and with an important econ-ecological role.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32917918 PMCID: PMC7486294 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-71835-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
ISSR primer used and their respective markers performance indexes.
| Primers | Sequence 5′ → 3′ | TNB | NPB | PIC | MI | RP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTH1 | (AG)8C | 31 | 31 | 0.16 | 5.0 | 6.9 |
| BTH2 | (AG)8T | 44 | 44 | 0.22 | 9.6 | 12.8 |
| BTH3 | (AG)8TC | 21 | 21 | 0.16 | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| BTH4 | (AG)8CA | 38 | 38 | 0.25 | 9.7 | 13.7 |
| BTH5 | (AG)8TA | 28 | 28 | 0.26 | 7.3 | 9.9 |
| BTH6 | (AG)8CC | 36 | 36 | 0.29 | 10.3 | 14.6 |
| BTH8 | (CT)8G | 35 | 35 | 0.13 | 4.7 | 5.9 |
| BTH9 | (CT)8T | 26 | 26 | 0.28 | 7.3 | 10.1 |
| BTH10 | (GA)8C | 32 | 32 | 0.27 | 8.6 | 11.8 |
| BTH11 | (GA)8CT | 36 | 36 | 0.17 | 6.0 | 7.7 |
| BTH12 | (GA)8TT | 28 | 28 | 0.28 | 7.9 | 11.2 |
| BTH13 | (GT)8C | 24 | 24 | 0.26 | 6.3 | 8.2 |
| B1 | (GT)6CC | 31 | 31 | 0.26 | 8.0 | 10.8 |
| B2 | (GT)6GG | 28 | 28 | 0.25 | 6.9 | 9.3 |
| TH1 | (GT)6CG | 32 | 32 | 0.23 | 7.4 | 10.0 |
| TH2 | (GT)6TG | 35 | 35 | 0.23 | 8.1 | 11.1 |
| Average | 31.5 | 31.5 | 0.23 | 7.3 | 9.9 | |
TNB total number of bands, NPB number of polymorphic bands, PIC polymorphism information content, MI marker index, RP resolving power.
Genetic diversity within B. aegyptiaca populations from Mauritania.
| Code number | Population | Na | Ne | Pa | I | %P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aleg | 1.3 | 1.23 | 9 | 0.24 | 64.75 |
| 2 | Yaghref_1 | 1.36 | 1.23 | 8 | 0.24 | 67.33 |
| 3 | Yaghref_2 | 1.39 | 1.21 | 9 | 0.24 | 68.32 |
| 4 | Boutilimit | 1.3 | 1.23 | 14 | 0.24 | 64.16 |
| 5 | Agchorguit | 1.23 | 1.21 | 2 | 0.22 | 61.19 |
| 6 | Tazyazet | 0.62 | 1.14 | 5 | 0.13 | 30.10 |
| 7 | Chami | 0.63 | 1.13 | 11 | 0.13 | 30.30 |
| Average | 1.12 | 1.2 | 8.29 | 0.21 | 55.16 | |
Na observed number of alleles, Ne effective number of alleles, Pa private alleles, I Shannon’s information index, %P percentage of polymorphic loci.
AMOVA for B. aegyptiaca populations from Mauritania.
| Source | df | SS | MS | Est. Var. | % of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among populations | 6 | 1,209,682 | 201,614 | 11,893 | 20 |
| Within populations | 84 | 4,087,373 | 48,659 | 48,659 | 80 |
| Total | 90 | 5,297,055 | 60,552 | 100 |
df degree of freedom, SS sum of squares, MS mean of squares, Est. Var. estimated variation, % of variation percentage of variation.
Figure 1UPGMA-dendrogram based on Jaccard’s similarity coefficient, of 7 natural populations of B. aegyptiaca, implemented by the software NTSYS-PC version 2.02 (Exeter software, New York).
Figure 2Two-dimensional representations of the first two axes of the principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) from the matrix of genetic distances of 91 samples from 7 populations.
Figure 3Results of Bayesian structure of the populations of B. aegyptiaca obtained with the structure program[37] The STRUCTURE HARVESTER based on the approach of Evanno et al.[27] indicates Delta K was achieved its highest peak when K = 2 followed by K = 5 (a). (b) Table output of the Evanno method results which Yellow highlight shows the maximum value in the Delta K column. From top to bottom the clusters at K = 2 (b) and at K = 5 (c). Each population is represented by a single vertical bar. The bar is divided into K colors, where K represents the number of genetic groups assumed as identified by the STRUCTURE program. Population’s numbers see Table 2.
Figure 4Map of Mauritania showing the study sites and rainfall patterns.