Literature DB >> 22942526

A synthesis of best evidence for the restoration of upper-extremity function in people with tetraplegia.

Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan1, Mary C Verrier.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Because upper-limb function represents overall function for individuals with tetraplegia, the restoration of upper-extremity function is exceedingly important for this population. The purpose of this review was to identify interventions that optimize upper-limb function after tetraplegia based on best available evidence.
METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, AMED, and PubMed with the search terms "hand function AND tetraplegia" and "upper limb function AND tetraplegia" found 384 articles. After elimination of duplicates and review of titles and abstracts, 43 studies were found to be applicable. Study quality of all applicable studies was assessed with a modified version of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network for Cohort Studies methodology.
RESULTS: The applicable studies were organized into three categories: conventional therapies (CT), electrical stimulation therapies (ES), and surgical interventions (SI). The proportion of papers in each category that presented with sufficient methodological quality to contribute to best evidence was as follows: CT: 0/2; ES: 10/21; SI: 6/20.
CONCLUSIONS: ES therapies are beneficial as assistive technologies and as therapeutic intervention in the subacute phase of recovery. SIs are suitable for individuals who meet very specific criteria for tendon-transfer surgery. Further clinical trials are warranted for ES and SI therapies to substantiate prescription of therapeutics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electric stimulation therapy; quadriplegia; recovery of function; upper extremity

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22942526      PMCID: PMC3207988          DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2009-46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Can        ISSN: 0300-0508            Impact factor:   1.037


  66 in total

1.  The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus.

Authors:  A P Verhagen; H C de Vet; R A de Bie; A G Kessels; M Boers; L M Bouter; P G Knipschild
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Relationship between shoulder muscle strength and functional independence measure (FIM) score among C6 tetraplegics.

Authors:  T Fujiwara; Y Hara; K Akaboshi; N Chino
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Massed practice versus massed practice with stimulation: effects on upper extremity function and cortical plasticity in individuals with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Kristina S Beekhuizen; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Clinical evaluation of the bionic glove.

Authors:  D Popović; A Stojanović; A Pjanović; S Radosavljević; M Popović; S Jović; D Vulović
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Upper extremity reconstruction in the tetraplegic population, a national epidemiologic study.

Authors:  Catherine M Curtin; David R Gater; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population.

Authors:  Kim D Anderson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Triceps denervation as a predictor of elbow flexion contractures in C5 and C6 tetraplegia.

Authors:  Anne M Bryden; Kevin L Kilgore; Benjamin B Lind; David T Yu
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Muscle strength changes as measured by dynamometry following functional rehabilitation in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  M Drolet; L Noreau; J Vachon; H Moffet
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 9.  Spinal trauma: new guidelines for assessment and management in the out-of-hospital environment.

Authors:  C J Mattera
Journal:  J Emerg Nurs       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation for grasping in subjects with cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  S Mangold; T Keller; A Curt; V Dietz
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.772

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Lindsay A Tetreault; Alina Karpova; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Rehabilitation After Surgical Reconstruction to Restore Function to the Upper Limb in Tetraplegia: A Changing Landscape.

Authors:  M Elise Johanson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  A noninvasive neuroprosthesis augments hand grasp force in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury: the functional and therapeutic effects.

Authors:  Rune Thorsen; Davide Dalla Costa; Sara Chiaramonte; Luca Binda; Ettore Beghi; Tiziana Redaelli; Eugenio Occhi; Maurizio Ferrarin
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-12-30

4.  Outcome Measures and Variables Affecting Prognosis of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.

Authors:  Mehmet Zileli; Shradha Maheshwari; Shashank Sharad Kale; Kanwaljeet Garg; Sajesh K Menon; Jutty Parthiban
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-09-30

5.  Development of Reaching, Grasping & Manipulation indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project.

Authors:  Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Naaz Kapadia; Dany H Gagnon; Molly C Verrier; Jennifer Holmes; Heather Flett; Farnoosh Farahani; S Mohammad Alavinia; Maryam Omidvar; Matheus J Wiest; B Catharine Craven
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.985

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.