S Mangold1, T Keller, A Curt, V Dietz. 1. Automatic Control Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ), Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Case series. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefit, shortcomings and acceptance of a new transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation (FES) technology aimed at improving the grasp function in tetraplegic subjects in acute and postacute rehabilitation. SETTING: Spinal cord injury (SCI) centre, university hospital. METHODS: : Subjects (N=11) with complete or incomplete SCI at C4/5-C7 who started FES 1-67 months after their accident were included. Hand function tests, analysis of video recordings and of written documentation of FES sessions, status of muscle strength, and follow-up query were used as outcome measures. RESULTS: Nine subjects used FES as a neuroprosthesis. Eight demonstrated improved grasp function and performance in activities of daily living. In one subject, no benefit from FES was observed. Two other subjects showed improvements in muscle strength and facilitation of active movement with FES. Four subjects successfully integrated FES as neuroprosthesis in everyday life within the rehabilitation centre. Three received the system for home use. The most relevant reasons for stopping the FES application were: (i) improvement of voluntary grasp function, (ii) physical and psychological problems, (iii) no available stimulator for home use, and (iv) insufficient assistance for electrode placement at home. Shortcomings related to the transcutaneous surface technology (eg pain or coactivation of neighbouring muscles) could usually be reduced, or did not limit the efficiency or acceptance of FES. Individually designed digital or analogue control devices were preferred. CONCLUSION: Tetraplegic subjects in acute and postacute rehabilitation can profit from a new transcutaneous FES system with respect to functional use and independence. It can be implemented in the rehabilitation programme for muscle strengthening and facilitation of voluntary activity. For a successful application of FES, there is a need for individual electrode placement, stimulation programmes, and FES control devices.
STUDY DESIGN: Case series. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefit, shortcomings and acceptance of a new transcutaneous functional electrical stimulation (FES) technology aimed at improving the grasp function in tetraplegic subjects in acute and postacute rehabilitation. SETTING:Spinal cord injury (SCI) centre, university hospital. METHODS: : Subjects (N=11) with complete or incomplete SCI at C4/5-C7 who started FES 1-67 months after their accident were included. Hand function tests, analysis of video recordings and of written documentation of FES sessions, status of muscle strength, and follow-up query were used as outcome measures. RESULTS: Nine subjects used FES as a neuroprosthesis. Eight demonstrated improved grasp function and performance in activities of daily living. In one subject, no benefit from FES was observed. Two other subjects showed improvements in muscle strength and facilitation of active movement with FES. Four subjects successfully integrated FES as neuroprosthesis in everyday life within the rehabilitation centre. Three received the system for home use. The most relevant reasons for stopping the FES application were: (i) improvement of voluntary grasp function, (ii) physical and psychological problems, (iii) no available stimulator for home use, and (iv) insufficient assistance for electrode placement at home. Shortcomings related to the transcutaneous surface technology (eg pain or coactivation of neighbouring muscles) could usually be reduced, or did not limit the efficiency or acceptance of FES. Individually designed digital or analogue control devices were preferred. CONCLUSION: Tetraplegic subjects in acute and postacute rehabilitation can profit from a new transcutaneous FES system with respect to functional use and independence. It can be implemented in the rehabilitation programme for muscle strengthening and facilitation of voluntary activity. For a successful application of FES, there is a need for individual electrode placement, stimulation programmes, and FES control devices.
Authors: Valentina Tomassini; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Laura Leonardi; Luis Paixão; Saad Jbabdi; Jackie Palace; Carlo Pozzilli; Paul M Matthews Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2010-09-10 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Lazar I Jovanovic; Naaz Kapadia; Vera Zivanovic; Hope Jervis Rademeyer; Mohammad Alavinia; Colleen McGillivray; Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Milos R Popovic; Cesar Marquez-Chin Journal: Spinal Cord Ser Cases Date: 2021-03-19
Authors: J D R Millán; R Rupp; G R Müller-Putz; R Murray-Smith; C Giugliemma; M Tangermann; C Vidaurre; F Cincotti; A Kübler; R Leeb; C Neuper; K-R Müller; D Mattia Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2010-09-07 Impact factor: 4.677