Literature DB >> 22941721

Dopamine asymmetries predict orienting bias in healthy individuals.

Rachel Tomer1, Heleen A Slagter, Bradley T Christian, Andrew S Fox, Carlye R King, Dhanabalan Murali, Richard J Davidson.   

Abstract

Pseudoneglect is traditionally viewed as reflecting right hemisphere specialization for processing spatial information, resulting in orienting toward the contralateral, left, hemispace. Recent evidence suggests that healthy individuals differ from each other in both direction and magnitude of orienting bias, and moreover, the bias displayed by a person is consistent across time, suggesting that it may represent a trait of the individual. Animal studies reveal consistent orienting bias within an individual, which reflects asymmetry in dopaminergic brain systems. We measured basal D2-like receptor binding using positron emission tomography and the high-affinity ligand [F-18]fallypride, to test the hypothesis that asymmetry in dopaminergic neurotransmission in healthy humans modulates the orienting bias in humans. As predicted, we found that individual differences in the direction and magnitude of the orienting bias were strongly associated with the pattern of asymmetric binding of dopamine (DA) D2 receptors in the striatum, as well as clusters in the frontal and temporal cortex. These findings show for the first time that orienting bias reflects individual differences in the lateralization of DA systems in the healthy human brain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET; asymmetry; dopamine; individual differences; spatial attention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22941721      PMCID: PMC3827711          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  38 in total

1.  The neurology of saccades and covert shifts in spatial attention: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  R J Perry; S Zeki
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples.

Authors:  Thomas E Nichols; Andrew P Holmes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images.

Authors:  M Jenkinson; S Smith
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Strategies to improve neuroreceptor parameter estimation by linear regression analysis.

Authors:  Masanori Ichise; Hiroshi Toyama; Robert B Innis; Richard E Carson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Brain imaging of 18F-fallypride in normal volunteers: blood analysis, distribution, test-retest studies, and preliminary assessment of sensitivity to aging effects on dopamine D-2/D-3 receptors.

Authors:  Jogeshwar Mukherjee; Bradley T Christian; Kelly A Dunigan; Bingzhi Shi; Tanjore K Narayanan; Martin Satter; Joseph Mantil
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 2.562

6.  What does the prefrontal cortex "do" in affect: perspectives on frontal EEG asymmetry research.

Authors:  Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Functional coupling of simultaneous electrical and metabolic activity in the human brain.

Authors:  Terrence R Oakes; Diego A Pizzagalli; Andrew M Hendrick; Katherine A Horras; Christine L Larson; Heather C Abercrombie; Stacey M Schaefer; John V Koger; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Effect of innate direction bias on T-maze learning in rats: implications for research.

Authors:  C Andrade; M Alwarshetty; S Sudha; J Suresh Chandra
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2001-09-30       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 9.  Spatial neglect and attention networks.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Dissociation of hemi-spatial and hemi-motor impairments in a unilateral primate model of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  A L Milton; J W B Marshall; R M Cummings; H F Baker; R M Ridley
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  15 in total

1.  Left-shifting prism adaptation boosts reward-based learning.

Authors:  Selene Schintu; Michael Freedberg; Zaynah M Alam; Sarah Shomstein; Eric M Wassermann
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 2.  Anticlockwise or clockwise? A dynamic Perception-Action-Laterality model for directionality bias in visuospatial functioning.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Visuospatial Asymmetries Arise from Differences in the Onset Time of Perceptual Evidence Accumulation.

Authors:  Daniel P Newman; Gerard M Loughnane; Simon P Kelly; Redmond G O'Connell; Mark A Bellgrove
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Interoception, homeostatic emotions and sympathovagal balance.

Authors:  Irina A Strigo; Arthur D Bud Craig
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Asymmetries in attention as revealed by fixations and saccades.

Authors:  Nicole A Thomas; Tobias Loetscher; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Hemispheric Asymmetry of Globus Pallidus Relates to Alpha Modulation in Reward-Related Attentional Tasks.

Authors:  Cecilia Mazzetti; Tobias Staudigl; Tom R Marshall; Johanna M Zumer; Sean J Fallon; Ole Jensen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Asymmetry of the endogenous opioid system in the human anterior cingulate: a putative molecular basis for lateralization of emotions and pain.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Watanabe; Sylvia Fitting; Muhammad Z Hussain; Olga Kononenko; Anna Iatsyshyna; Takashi Yoshitake; Jan Kehr; Kanar Alkass; Henrik Druid; Henrik Wadensten; Per E Andren; Ingrid Nylander; Douglas H Wedell; Oleg Krishtal; Kurt F Hauser; Fred Nyberg; Victor M Karpyak; Tatjana Yakovleva; Georgy Bakalkin
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Love to win or hate to Lose? Asymmetry of dopamine D2 receptor binding predicts sensitivity to reward versus punishment.

Authors:  Rachel Tomer; Heleen A Slagter; Bradley T Christian; Andrew S Fox; Carlye R King; Dhanabalan Murali; Mark A Gluck; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Preliminary effects of prefrontal tDCS on dopamine-mediated behavior and psychophysiology.

Authors:  Michael J Imburgio; Hannah K Ballard; Astin C Cornwall; Darrell A Worthy; Jessica A Bernard; Joseph M Orr
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Gemma Learmonth; Aodhan Gallagher; Jamie Gibson; Gregor Thut; Monika Harvey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.