Literature DB >> 30399479

Left-shifting prism adaptation boosts reward-based learning.

Selene Schintu1, Michael Freedberg2, Zaynah M Alam3, Sarah Shomstein4, Eric M Wassermann3.   

Abstract

Visuospatial cognition has an inherent lateralized bias. Individual differences in the direction and magnitude of this bias are associated with asymmetrical D2/3 dopamine binding and dopamine system genotypes. Dopamine level affects feedback-based learning and dopamine signaling asymmetry is related to differential learning from reward and punishment. High D2 binding in the left hemisphere is associated with preference for reward. Prism adaptation (PA) is a simple sensorimotor technique, which modulates visuospatial bias according to the direction of the deviation. Left-deviating prism adaptation (LPA) induces rightward bias in healthy subjects. It is therefore possible that the right side of space increases in saliency along with left hemisphere dopaminergic activity. Right-deviating prism adaptation (RPA) has been used mainly as a control condition because it does not modulate behavior in healthy individuals. Since LPA induces a rightward visuospatial bias as a result of left hemisphere modulation, and higher dopaminergic activity in the left hemisphere is associated with preference for rewarding events we hypothesized that LPA would increase the preference for learning with reward. Healthy volunteers performed a computer-based probabilistic classification task before and after LPA or RPA. Consistent with our predictions, PA altered the preference for rewarded versus punished learning, with the LPA group exhibiting increased learning from reward. These results suggest that PA modulates dopaminergic activity in a lateralized fashion.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dopamine; Feedback learning; Line bisection; Prism adaptation; Pseudoneglect

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30399479      PMCID: PMC7327780          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.09.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  49 in total

1.  Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.

Authors:  G Jewell; M E McCourt
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Dynamic changes in brain activity during prism adaptation.

Authors:  Jacques Luauté; Sophie Schwartz; Yves Rossetti; Mona Spiridon; Gilles Rode; Dominique Boisson; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The involvement of the dopaminergic midbrain and cortico-striatal-thalamic circuits in the integration of reward prospect and attentional task demands.

Authors:  Ruth M Krebs; Carsten N Boehler; Kenneth C Roberts; Allen W Song; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Patryk A Laurent; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Prismatic adaptation changes visuospatial representation in the inferior parietal lobule.

Authors:  Sonia Crottaz-Herbette; Eleonora Fornari; Stephanie Clarke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Dopamine system genes are associated with orienting bias among healthy individuals.

Authors:  Polina Zozulinsky; Lior Greenbaum; Noa Brande-Eilat; Yair Braun; Idan Shalev; Rachel Tomer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Neurochemical correlate of a spatial preference in rats.

Authors:  B Zimmerberg; S D Glick; T P Jerussi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Eye-blink rate predicts individual differences in pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Heleen A Slagter; Richard J Davidson; Rachel Tomer
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Beyond the Sensorimotor Plasticity: Cognitive Expansion of Prism Adaptation in Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Carine Michel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  Prism Adaptation Modulates Connectivity of the Intraparietal Sulcus with Multiple Brain Networks.

Authors:  Selene Schintu; Michael Freedberg; Stephen J Gotts; Catherine A Cunningham; Zaynah M Alam; Sarah Shomstein; Eric M Wassermann
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Improvement of phonemic fluency following leftward prism adaptation.

Authors:  Patrizia Turriziani; Gabriele Chiaramonte; Giuseppa Renata Mangano; Rosario Emanuele Bonaventura; Daniela Smirni; Massimiliano Oliveri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Effective connectivity underlying neural and behavioral components of prism adaptation.

Authors:  Selene Schintu; Stephen J Gotts; Michael Freedberg; Sarah Shomstein; Eric M Wassermann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.