Literature DB >> 22940030

Loop ileostomies in colorectal cancer patients--morbidity and risk factors for nonreversal.

Bodil Gessler1, Eva Haglind, Eva Angenete.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In colorectal cancer patients, loop ileostomies are used to protect an anastomosis, in salvage surgery after a complication, and as a palliative measure. The aim of this study was to identify complications to the ileostomy, time until reversal, and risk factors for nonclosure or a permanent stoma.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who received a loop ileostomy with the diagnosis of colorectal cancer at index surgery in four hospitals in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden, from January 1, 2007 until February 28, 2010 were retrospectively studied. Demography, events during index surgery, complications related to the ileostomy and technique, and complications during closure were registered.
RESULTS: A total of 262 patients received a loop ileostomy. Loop iliostomies were constructed during emergency surgery in 15% of patients. Forty-three percent had complications related to the ileostomy; most common were high-volume output and leakage of stomal output. Morbidity after closure was high, at 28%, and mortality was 1%. Eighty-six percent had their stoma closed, median time 178 (3-700) d. Risk factors for nonreversal were postoperative complications to index surgery and advanced cancer disease. Eleven percent received a secondary stoma, and at the end of the study 23% had a permanent stoma.
CONCLUSIONS: The morbidity related to loop ileostomies and loop ileostomy closure is considerable. One in five patients will have a permanent stoma, and our conclusion is that for emergency patients with advanced disease another type of stoma should be chosen, if possible, to reduce the morbidity.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22940030     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  40 in total

1.  Morbidity and mortality after surgery for nonmalignant colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Anne F Peery; Nicholas J Shaheen; Katherine S Cools; Todd H Baron; Mark Koruda; Joseph A Galanko; Ian S Grimm
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Intersphincteric Resection Pushing the Envelope for Sphincter Preservation.

Authors:  Quentin Denost; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

3.  A temporary loop ileostomy affects renal function.

Authors:  Bodil Gessler; Eva Haglind; Eva Angenete
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The use of purse-string skin closure in loop ileostomy reversals leads to lower wound infection rates--a single high-volume centre experience.

Authors:  Nils Habbe; Sabine Hannes; Juliane Liese; Guido Woeste; Wolf Otto Bechstein; Christoph Strey
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of incisional hernia post-reversal of ileostomy.

Authors:  F De Haes; N L Bullen; G A Antoniou; N J Smart; S A Antoniou
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Two-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through coloanal anastomosis versus coloanal anastomosis with protective loop ileostomy for low rectal cancer. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial (Turnbull-BCN).

Authors:  Sebastiano Biondo; Loris Trenti; Ana Galvez; Eloy Espin-Basany; Francesco Bianco; Giovanni Romano; Esther Kreisler
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rudolf Mennigen; Wiebke Sewald; Norbert Senninger; Emile Rijcken
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection.

Authors:  Peter Ihnát; Petra Guňková; Matúš Peteja; Petr Vávra; Anton Pelikán; Pavel Zonča
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The Safety of Outpatient Stoma Closure: on the Verge of a Paradigm Shift?

Authors:  James P Taylor; Miloslawa Stem; Sophia Y Chen; David Yu; Sandy H Fang; Susan L Gearhart; Bashar Safar; Jonathan E Efron
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Evolving treatment strategies for colorectal cancer: a critical review of current therapeutic options.

Authors:  Daniel C Damin; Anderson R Lazzaron
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.