Literature DB >> 22936416

An angiographic technique for coronary fractional flow reserve measurement: in vivo validation.

Shigeho Takarada1, Zhang Zhang, Sabee Molloi.   

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an important prognostic determinant in a clinical setting. However, its measurement currently requires the use of invasive pressure wire, while an angiographic technique based on first-pass distribution analysis and scaling laws can be used to measure FFR using only image data. Eight anesthetized swine were instrumented with flow probe on the proximal segment of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary arteries. Volumetric blood flow from the flow probe (Qp), coronary pressure (Pa) and right atrium pressure (Pv) were continuously recorded. Flow probe-based FFR (FFRq) was measured from the ratio of flow with and without stenosis. To determine the angiography-based FFR (FFRa), the ratio of blood flow in the presence of a stenosis (QS) to theoretically normal blood flow (QN) was calculated. A region of interest in the LAD arterial bed was drawn to generate time-density curves using angiographic images. QS was measured using a time-density curve and the assumption that blood was momentarily replaced with contrast agent during the injection. QN was estimated from the total coronary arterial volume using scaling laws. Pressure-wire measurements of FFR (FFRp), which was calculated from the ratio of distal coronary pressure (Pd) divided by proximal pressure (Pa), were continuously obtained during the study. A total of 54 measurements of FFRa, FFRp, and FFRq were taken. FFRa showed a good correlation with FFRq (FFRa = 0.97 FFRq +0.06, r(2) = 0.80, p < 0.001), although FFRp overestimated the FFRq (FFRp = 0.657 FFRq + 0.313, r(2) = 0.710, p < 0.0001). Additionally, the Bland-Altman analysis showed a close agreement between FFRa and FFRq. This angiographic technique to measure FFR can potentially be used to evaluate both anatomical and physiological assessments of a coronary stenosis during routine diagnostic cardiac catheterization that requires no pressure wires.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22936416      PMCID: PMC3548942          DOI: 10.1007/s10554-012-0119-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  41 in total

Review 1.  Theoretical models for coronary vascular biomechanics: progress & challenges.

Authors:  Sarah L Waters; Jordi Alastruey; Daniel A Beard; Peter H M Bovendeerd; Peter F Davies; Girija Jayaraman; Oliver E Jensen; Jack Lee; Kim H Parker; Aleksander S Popel; Timothy W Secomb; Maria Siebes; Spencer J Sherwin; Rebecca J Shipley; Nicolas P Smith; Frans N van de Vosse
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Adenosine and maximum coronary vasodilation in humans: myth and misconceptions in the assessment of coronary reserve.

Authors:  Gerd Heusch
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 17.165

3.  Quantification of coronary microvascular resistance using angiographic images for volumetric blood flow measurement: in vivo validation.

Authors:  Zhang Zhang; Shigeho Takarada; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Regional blood flow analysis and its relationship with arterial branch lengths and lumen volume in the coronary arterial tree.

Authors:  Sabee Molloi; Jerry T Wong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Novel insights into RV adaptation and function in hypoplastic left heart syndrome between the first 2 stages of surgical palliation.

Authors:  Nee Scze Khoo; Jeffrey F Smallhorn; Sachie Kaneko; Kimberly Myers; Shelby Kutty; Edythe B Tham
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02

6.  Assessment of collateral artery function and growth in a pig model of stepwise coronary occlusion.

Authors:  Daphne de Groot; Sebastian Grundmann; Leo Timmers; Gerard Pasterkamp; Imo E Hoefer
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Pim A L Tonino; Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H J Pijls; Uwe Siebert; Fumiaki Ikeno; Marcel van' t Veer; Volker Klauss; Ganesh Manoharan; Thomas Engstrøm; Keith G Oldroyd; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A MacCarthy; William F Fearon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Scaling of myocardial mass to flow and morphometry of coronary arteries.

Authors:  Jenny Susana Choy; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-03-06

Review 9.  Vascular control in humans: focus on the coronary microcirculation.

Authors:  Yanping Liu; David D Gutterman
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 17.165

Review 10.  Coronary microvascular resistance: methods for its quantification in humans.

Authors:  Paul Knaapen; Paolo G Camici; Koen M Marques; Robin Nijveldt; Jeroen J Bax; Nico Westerhof; Marco J W Götte; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Heinrich R Schelbert; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 17.165

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2013 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Distinction of non-ischemia inducing versus ischemia inducing coronary stenosis by fluorescent cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Sabine Wipper; Beate Reiter; Detlef Russ; Fabian Hahnel; Jan-Felix Kersten; Tilo Kölbel; Hermann Reichenspurner; Christian Detter
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Comprehensive assessment of coronary fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Xiaolong Qi; Guoxin Fan; Deqiu Zhu; Wanrong Ma; Changqing Yang
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.318

4.  Noninvasive Measurement of Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve: An Under-exploiting Newland.

Authors:  Guo-Xin Fan; Ruo-Shuang Han; Jia-Chen Luo; Bi-Sheng Huang; Tao Jiang; Ji-Kun Wang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Determination of culprit coronary artery branches using hemodynamic indices from angiographic images.

Authors:  Zhang Zhang; Jun Chen; Shigeho Takarada; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.316

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.