Literature DB >> 22936069

Adaptation to (non)valent task disturbance.

Wilfried Kunde1, Susanne Augst, Thomas Kleinsorge.   

Abstract

The cognitive system adapts to disturbances caused by task-irrelevant information. For example, interference due to irrelevant spatial stimulation (e.g., the spatial Simon effect) typically diminishes right after a spatially incongruent event. These adaptation effects reflect processes that help to overcome the impact of task-irrelevant information. Interference with (or interruption of) task processing can also result from valent (i.e., positive or negative) stimuli, such as in the "affective Simon" task. In the present study, we tested whether the resolution of valence-based task disturbances generalizes to the resolution of other cognitive (spatial) types of interference, and vice versa. Experiments 1 and 2 explored the interplay of adaptation effects triggered by spatial and affective interference. Incongruent spatial information modified the spatial Simon effect but not affective interference effects, whereas incongruent affective information modified affective interference effects to some extent, but not spatial Simon effects. In Experiment 3, we investigated the interplay of adaptation effects triggered by spatial interference and by the interruption of task processing from valent information that did not overlap with the main task ("emotional Stroop" effect). Again we observed domain-specific adaptation for the spatial Simon effect but found no evidence for cross-domain modulations. We assume that the processes used to resolve task disturbance from irrelevant affective and spatial information operate in largely independent manners.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22936069     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-012-0116-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  45 in total

Review 1.  Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning.

Authors:  A Ohman; S Mineka
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control.

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr; Edward Awh; Paul Laurey
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect.

Authors:  Daniel Algom; Eran Chajut; Shlomo Lev
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-09

4.  Attentional interference effects of emotional pictures: threat, negativity, or arousal?

Authors:  Ulrich Schimmack; Douglas Derryberry
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2005-03

5.  Resolving emotional conflict: a role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala.

Authors:  Amit Etkin; Tobias Egner; Daniel M Peraza; Eric R Kandel; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control.

Authors:  Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Reward counteracts conflict adaptation. Evidence for a role of affect in executive control.

Authors:  Henk van Steenbergen; Guido P H Band; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-11-09

8.  Post-conflict slowing: cognitive adaptation after conflict processing.

Authors:  Tom Verguts; Wim Notebaert; Wilfried Kunde; Peter Wühr
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

9.  Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict.

Authors:  Jin Fan; Jonathan I Flombaum; Bruce D McCandliss; Kathleen M Thomas; Michael I Posner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Affective privilege: asymmetric interference by emotional distracters.

Authors:  Crystal Reeck; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-09-16
View more
  7 in total

1.  Post-conflict slowing after incongruent stimuli: from general to conflict-specific.

Authors:  Alodie Rey-Mermet; Beat Meier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-03-28

2.  Can we shield ourselves from task disturbance by emotion-laden stimulation?

Authors:  Susanne Augst; Thomas Kleinsorge; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.526

3.  Creatures of habit (and control): a multi-level learning perspective on the modulation of congruency effects.

Authors:  Tobias Egner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-06

Review 4.  What determines the specificity of conflict adaptation? A review, critical analysis, and proposed synthesis.

Authors:  Senne Braem; Elger L Abrahamse; Wout Duthoo; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-08

Review 5.  The heterogeneous world of congruency sequence effects: an update.

Authors:  Wout Duthoo; Elger L Abrahamse; Senne Braem; Carsten N Boehler; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-09

6.  Limitations of cognitive control on emotional distraction - Congruency in the Color Stroop task does not modulate the Emotional Stroop effect.

Authors:  Elisa Ruth Straub; Constantin Schmidts; Wilfried Kunde; Jinhui Zhang; Andrea Kiesel; David Dignath
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Contributions of expected sensory and affective action effects to action selection and performance: Evidence from forced- and free-choice tasks.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel; Dominique P Lippelt; Ermine Gurbuz; Roland Pfister
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.