Literature DB >> 22934138

A method for limiting pitfalls in the production of enhancement kinetic curves in 3T dynamic magnetic resonance mammography.

Eleftherios Lavdas, Panayiotis Mavroidis, Violeta Roka, Nikolaos Arikidis, Dimitrios L Arvanitis, Ioannis V Fezoulidis, Katerina Vassiou.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study is to investigate means for the reduction or even elimination of enhancement kinetic curve errors due to breast motion in order to avoid pitfalls and to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the method.
METHODS: 115 women underwent breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). All patients were properly immobilized in a dedicated bilateral phased array coil. A magnetic resonance unit 3-Tesla (Signa, GE Healthcare) was used. The following sequences were applied: (I) axial Τ2-TSE, (II) axial STIR and (III) Vibrant axial T1-weighted fat saturation (six phases). Kinetic curves were derived semi-automatically using the software of the system and manually by positioning the regions of interest (ROI) from stable reference points in all the phases.
RESULTS: 376 abnormalities in 115 patients were investigated. In 81 (21.5%) cases, a change of the enhancement kinetic curve type was found when the two different methods were used. In cases of large fatty breasts, a change of the enhancement kinetic curve type in 13 lesions was found. In cases of small and dense breasts, only in 4 lesions the kinetic curve type changed, whereas in cases of small and fatty breasts, the kinetic curve type changed in 64 lesions (50 were observed in left breasts and 14 in right breasts).
CONCLUSIONS: The derivation of enhancement kinetic curves should be performed by controlling and verifying that the ROIs lay at the same location of the lesion in all the phases of the dynamic study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3 Tesla; Dynamic magnetic resonance mammography; enhancement kinetic curves

Year:  2012        PMID: 22934138      PMCID: PMC3426736          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2012.07.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  28 in total

1.  Linear motion correction in three dimensions applied to dynamic gadolinium enhanced breast imaging.

Authors:  S Krishnan; T L Chenevert; M A Helvie; F L Londy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Hans H Schild; Nuschin Morakkabati
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.

Authors:  Mitchell D Schnall; Jeffrey Blume; David A Bluemke; Gia A DeAngelis; Nanette DeBruhl; Steven Harms; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Nola Hylton; Christiane K Kuhl; Etta D Pisano; Petrina Causer; Stuart J Schnitt; David Thickman; Carol B Stelling; Paul T Weatherall; Constance Lehman; Constantine A Gatsonis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  An interactive dynamic analysis and decision support software for MR mammography.

Authors:  Gökhan Ertaş; H Ozcan Gülçür; Mehtap Tunaci
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with WHO tumor grading for gliomas.

Authors:  L Lüdemann; W Grieger; R Wurm; M Budzisch; B Hamm; C Zimmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  A method for limiting pitfalls in the production of enhancement kinetic curves in 3T dynamic magnetic resonance mammography.

Authors:  Eleftherios Lavdas; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Violeta Roka; Nikolaos Arikidis; Dimitrios L Arvanitis; Ioannis V Fezoulidis; Katerina Vassiou
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  The effect of motion correction on pharmacokinetic parameter estimation in dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  A Melbourne; J Hipwell; M Modat; T Mertzanidou; H Huisman; S Ourselin; D J Hawkes
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.

Authors:  K A Kvistad; J Rydland; J Vainio; H B Smethurst; S Lundgren; H E Fjøsne; O Haraldseth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy.

Authors:  David A Bluemke; Constantine A Gatsonis; Mei Hsiu Chen; Gia A DeAngelis; Nanette DeBruhl; Steven Harms; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Nola Hylton; Christiane K Kuhl; Constance Lehman; Etta D Pisano; Petrina Causer; Stuart J Schnitt; Stanley F Smazal; Carol B Stelling; Paul T Weatherall; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Value of MR imaging in clinical evaluation of breast lesions.

Authors:  M Kristoffersen Wiberg; P Aspelin; L Perbeck; B Boné
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.990

View more
  1 in total

1.  A method for limiting pitfalls in the production of enhancement kinetic curves in 3T dynamic magnetic resonance mammography.

Authors:  Eleftherios Lavdas; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Violeta Roka; Nikolaos Arikidis; Dimitrios L Arvanitis; Ioannis V Fezoulidis; Katerina Vassiou
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.895

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.