Literature DB >> 22086390

The effect of motion correction on pharmacokinetic parameter estimation in dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI.

A Melbourne1, J Hipwell, M Modat, T Mertzanidou, H Huisman, S Ourselin, D J Hawkes.   

Abstract

A dynamic-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) dataset consists of many imaging frames, often acquired both before and after contrast injection. Due to the length of time spent acquiring images, patient motion is likely and image re-alignment or registration is required before further analysis such as pharmacokinetic model fitting. Non-rigid image registration procedures may be used to correct motion artefacts; however, a careful choice of registration strategy is required to reduce misregistration artefacts associated with enhancing features. This work investigates the effect of registration on the results of model-fitting algorithms for 52 DCE-MR mammography cases for 14 patients. Results are divided into two sections: a comparison of registration strategies in which a DCE-MRI-specific algorithm is preferred in 50% of cases, followed by an investigation of parameter changes with known applied deformations, inspecting the effect of magnitude and timing of motion artefacts. Increased motion magnitude correlates with increased model-fit residual and is seen to have a strong influence on the visibility of strongly enhancing features. Motion artefacts in images close to the contrast agent arrival have a disproportionate effect on discrepancies in parameter estimation. The choice of algorithm, magnitude of motion and timing of the motion are each shown to influence estimated pharmacokinetic parameters even when motion magnitude is small.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22086390     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/24/001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

1.  Shape-based motion correction in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for quantitative assessment of renal function.

Authors:  Wenyang Liu; Kyunghyun Sung; Dan Ruan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Quantitative effects of acquisition duration and temporal resolution on the measurement accuracy of prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data: a phantom study.

Authors:  Silvin Paul Knight; Jacinta Elizabeth Browne; James Frances Mary Meaney; Andrew John Fagan
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  A method for limiting pitfalls in the production of enhancement kinetic curves in 3T dynamic magnetic resonance mammography.

Authors:  Eleftherios Lavdas; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Violeta Roka; Nikolaos Arikidis; Dimitrios L Arvanitis; Ioannis V Fezoulidis; Katerina Vassiou
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  GIFTed Demons: deformable image registration with local structure-preserving regularization using supervoxels for liver applications.

Authors:  Bartłomiej W Papież; James M Franklin; Mattias P Heinrich; Fergus V Gleeson; Michael Brady; Julia A Schnabel
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-04-04

5.  Fat-based registration of breast dynamic contrast enhanced water images.

Authors:  Subashini Srinivasan; Brian A Hargreaves; Bruce L Daniel
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  The Effect of Registration on Voxel-Wise Tofts Model Parameters and Uncertainties from DCE-MRI of Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Using 3DSlicer.

Authors:  Matthew Mouawad; Heather Biernaski; Muriel Brackstone; Michael Lock; Anat Kornecki; Olga Shmuilovich; Ilanit Ben-Nachum; Frank S Prato; R Terry Thompson; Stewart Gaede; Neil Gelman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Quantitative high-resolution renal perfusion imaging using 3-dimensional through-time radial generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition.

Authors:  Katherine L Wright; Yong Chen; Haris Saybasili; Mark A Griswold; Nicole Seiberlich; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 8.  DCE-MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma-clinical and therapeutic image biomarker.

Authors:  Bang-Bin Chen; Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Motion correction of chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI series using robust principal component analysis (RPCA) and PCA.

Authors:  Chongxue Bie; Yuhua Liang; Lihong Zhang; Yingcheng Zhao; Yanrong Chen; Xueru Zhang; Xiaowei He; Xiaolei Song
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-10

10.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI versus 18F-FDG PET/CT: Which is better in differentiation between malignant and benign solitary pulmonary nodules?

Authors:  Feng Feng; Fulin Qiang; Aijun Shen; Donghui Shi; Aiyan Fu; Haiming Li; Mingzhu Zhang; Ganlin Xia; Peng Cao
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.