| Literature DB >> 22934068 |
Rani Pallavi1, Marco Giorgio, Pier G Pelicci.
Abstract
Over the last several years, new evidence has kept pouring in about the remarkable effect of caloric restriction (CR) on the conspicuous bedfellows- aging and cancer. Through the use of various animal models, it is now well established that by reducing calorie intake one can not only increase life span but, also, lower the risk of various age related diseases such as cancer. Cancer cells are believed to be more dependent on glycolysis for their energy requirements than normal cells and, therefore, can be easily targeted by alteration in the energy-metabolic pathways, a hallmark of CR. Apart from inhibiting the growth of transplantable tumors, CR has been also shown to inhibit the development of spontaneous, radiation, and chemically induced tumors. The question regarding the potentiality of the anti-tumor effect of CR in humans has been in part answered by the resistance of a cohort of women, who had suffered from anorexia in their early life, to breast cancer. However, human research on the beneficial effect of CR is still at an early stage and needs further validation. Though the complete mechanism of the anti-tumor effect of CR is far from clear, the plausible involvement of nutrient sensing pathways or IGF-1 pathways proposed for its anti-aging action cannot be overruled. In fact, cancer cell lines, mutant for proteins involved in IGF-1 pathways, failed to respond to CR. In addition, CR decreases the levels of many growth factors, anabolic hormones, inflammatory cytokines, and oxidative markers that are deregulated in several cancers. In this review, we discuss the anti-tumor effect of CR, describing experiments done in vitro in tumor models and in vivo in mouse models in which the tumor was induced by means of radiation or chemical exposure, expressing oncogenes or deleting tumor suppression genes. We also discuss the proposed mechanisms of CR anti-tumor action. Lastly, we argue the necessity of gene expression studies in cancerous versus normal cells upon CR.Entities:
Keywords: aging; anti-tumor effect; caloric restriction; cancer; dietary restriction
Year: 2012 PMID: 22934068 PMCID: PMC3429088 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00318
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Caloric Restriction (CR) and Cancer. (A) CR effectively inhibits various kinds of cancer in animal models. (B) Correlation between decrease in the incidence of tumor and severity of CR. (C) Demonstration of parallel and opposing effects of CR on cancer and aging. The ability of CR to decrease the levels of IGF-1 and ROS and inhibit the PI3K-AKT pathway can simultaneously protect cells from aging and cancer. However, CR ability to maintain telomere length and reduce the frequency of senescence can promote cancer but may be also beneficial in delaying aging.
Summary of the extent of caloric restriction and its effect on tumor growth.
| Female sprague dawley rats | 50 kcal/day | 35 kcal/day | 30 | Decreased MNU induced carcinoma | Bunk et al., |
| Sukling male lewis rats | 84 kcal/day | ~75.6 kcal/day, ~71.5 kcal/day, ~67.3 kcal/day, ~58.9 kcal/day | 10, 15, 20, 30 | CR inhibited Azaserine-induced preneoplastic lesion The inhibition increased with more severe restriction regimens | Roebuck et al., |
| Balb/c | - | 30 | CR reduced tumor growth and metastasis in aggressive model of hormone independent breast cancer in syngeneic model using triple negative 66cl4 tumor cells in Balb/c mice | Phoenix et al., | |
| Apc (Min) mouse | - | 40 | Intestinal polyp was reduced by 57% by CR | Mai et al., | |
| Male FischerX cophenhagen F1 rats | ~44.53 kcal/day | (1) 30% total diet restriction (2) 30% carbohydrate restriction (3) 30% lipid restriction | Each of the 3 different restriction diets inhibited R3327 tumor to the same extent | Mukherjee et al., | |
| Adult male SCID mice | 11.1 kcal/day | (1) 30% total diet restriction (2) 30% carbohydrate restriction (3) 30% lipid restriction | Each of the 3 different restriction diets inhibited LNGP human carcinoma to the same extent | Mukherjee et al., | |
| C57BL/6J and BALBc/J-SCID | 13 kcal/day | 30% | CR reduced intra- cerebral CT-2A tumor growth and angiogenesis in syngeneic CT-2A experimental mouse brain tumor | Mukherjee et al., | |
| C57BL/6J and BALBc/J-SCID | - | 40% | CR decreased vascularity (factor VIII) and increased apoptosis in three distinct models of brain tumor (a) A malignant mouse astrocytoma (CT-2A) (b) A human glioma (U87-MG) (c) Mouse ependymoblastoma | Mukherjee et al., | |
| C57BL/6 | - | 30% | CR inhibited MMTV-Wnt1 tumor growth in mouse model of post-menopausal obesity | Nogueira et al., | |
| VM/DK (VM) | - | 60% | CR effectively reduce malignant brain tumor growth in VM-M3 GBM model | Shelton et al., | |
Figure 2Schematic representation of CR known and potential effects on cancer hallmarks.