Literature DB >> 22933807

Parietal influence on temporal encoding indexed by simultaneous transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography.

Martin Wiener1, Dasha Kliot, Peter E Turkeltaub, Roy H Hamilton, David A Wolk, H Branch Coslett.   

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that contingent negative variation (CNV), as recorded by electroencaphalography (EEG), may serve as an index of temporal encoding. The interpretation of these studies is complicated by the fact that, in a majority of studies, the CNV signal was obtained at a time when subjects were not only registering stimulus duration but also making decisions and preparing to act. Previously, we demonstrated that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the right supramarginal gyrus (rSMG) in humans lengthened the perceived duration of a visual stimulus (Wiener et al., 2010a), suggesting the rSMG is involved in basic encoding processes. Here, we report a replication of this effect with simultaneous EEG recordings during the encoding of stimulus duration. Stimulation of the rSMG led to an increase in perceived duration and the amplitude of N1 and CNV components recorded from frontocentral sites. Furthermore, the size of the CNV amplitude, but not N1, positively correlated with the size of the rTMS effect but negatively correlated with bias (the baseline tendency to report a comparison stimulus as shorter), suggesting that the CNV indexes stimulus duration. These results suggest that a feedforward mechanism from parietal to prefrontal regions mediates temporal encoding and demonstrate a dissociation between early and late phases of encoding processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22933807      PMCID: PMC3448365          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2511-12.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  54 in total

Review 1.  What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing.

Authors:  Catalin V Buhusi; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Modeling the effects of payoff on response bias in a perceptual discrimination task: bound-change, drift-rate-change, or two-stage-processing hypothesis.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-02

3.  Neurophysiology of implicit timing in serial choice reaction-time performance.

Authors:  Peter Praamstra; Dimitrios Kourtis; Hoi Fei Kwok; Robert Oostenveld
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Response anticipation and response conflict: an event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Jin Fan; Rachel Kolster; Jamshid Ghajar; Minah Suh; Robert T Knight; Ranjeeta Sarkar; Bruce D McCandliss
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Automated cortical projection of EEG sensors: anatomical correlation via the international 10-10 system.

Authors:  L Koessler; L Maillard; A Benhadid; J P Vignal; J Felblinger; H Vespignani; M Braun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Differences in TMS-evoked responses between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls can be observed without a dedicated EEG system.

Authors:  Nava Levit-Binnun; Vladimir Litvak; Hillel Pratt; Elisha Moses; Menashe Zaroor; Avi Peled
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  An event-related potential study of temporal information encoding and decision making.

Authors:  Youguo Chen; Xiting Huang; Bo Yang; Todd Jackson; Chunhua Peng; Hong Yuan; Chunxiang Liu
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields.

Authors:  D Lehmann; W Skrandies
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-06

10.  Maximum likelihood estimation: the best PEST.

Authors:  A Pentland
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-10
View more
  16 in total

1.  The role of cortical beta oscillations in time estimation.

Authors:  Shrikanth Kulashekhar; Johanna Pekkola; Jaakko Matias Palva; Satu Palva
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Individual differences in the morphometry and activation of time perception networks are influenced by dopamine genotype.

Authors:  Martin Wiener; Yune-Sang Lee; Falk W Lohoff; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Time Adaptation Shows Duration Selectivity in the Human Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Masamichi J Hayashi; Thomas Ditye; Tokiko Harada; Maho Hashiguchi; Norihiro Sadato; Synnöve Carlson; Vincent Walsh; Ryota Kanai
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Dopamine-dependent oscillations in frontal cortex index "start-gun" signal in interval timing.

Authors:  Tadeusz W Kononowicz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  It's time to take the psychology of biological time into account: speed of driving affects a trip's subjective duration.

Authors:  Hedderik van Rijn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-16

Review 6.  Characterizing and Modulating Brain Circuitry through Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Electroencephalography.

Authors:  Faranak Farzan; Marine Vernet; Mouhsin M D Shafi; Alexander Rotenberg; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.492

7.  Source analysis of electrophysiological correlates of beat induction as sensory-guided action.

Authors:  Neil P M Todd; Christopher S Lee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-14

8.  Continuous carryover of temporal context dissociates response bias from perceptual influence for duration.

Authors:  Martin Wiener; James C Thompson; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Object size determines the spatial spread of visual time.

Authors:  Corinne Fulcher; Paul V McGraw; Neil W Roach; David Whitaker; James Heron
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Brain Bases of Working Memory for Time Intervals in Rhythmic Sequences.

Authors:  Sundeep Teki; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.