Literature DB >> 24269802

Individual differences in the morphometry and activation of time perception networks are influenced by dopamine genotype.

Martin Wiener1, Yune-Sang Lee2, Falk W Lohoff3, H Branch Coslett2.   

Abstract

Individual participants vary greatly in their ability to estimate and discriminate intervals of time. This heterogeneity of performance may be caused by reliance on different time perception networks as well as individual differences in the activation of brain structures utilized for timing within those networks. To address these possibilities we utilized event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while human participants (n=25) performed a temporal or color discrimination task. Additionally, based on our previous research, we genotyped participants for DRD2/ANKK1-Taq1a, a single-nucleotide polymorphism associated with a 30-40% reduction in striatal D2 density and associated with poorer timing performance. Similar to previous reports, a wide range of performance was found across our sample; crucially, better performance on the timing versus color task was associated with greater activation in prefrontal and sub-cortical regions previously associated with timing. Furthermore, better timing performance also correlated with increased volume of the right lateral cerebellum, as demonstrated by voxel-based morphometry. Our analysis also revealed that A1 carriers of the Taq1a polymorphism exhibited relatively worse performance on temporal, but not color discrimination, but greater activation in the striatum and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, as well as reduced volume in the cerebellar cluster. These results point to the neural bases for heterogeneous timing performance in humans, and suggest that differences in performance on a temporal discrimination task are, in part, attributable to the DRD2/ANKK1 genotype.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24269802      PMCID: PMC3932560          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  71 in total

1.  The right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is essential in time reproduction: an investigation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Catherine R G Jones; Karin Rosenkranz; John C Rothwell; Marjan Jahanshahi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing.

Authors:  Catalin V Buhusi; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Localization of load sensitivity of working memory storage: quantitatively and qualitatively discrepant results yielded by single-subject and group-averaged approaches to fMRI group analysis.

Authors:  Eva Feredoes; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The neural bases of the short-term storage of verbal information are anatomically variable across individuals.

Authors:  Eva Feredoes; Giulio Tononi; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited.

Authors:  K J Friston; A P Holmes; J B Poline; P J Grasby; S C Williams; R S Frackowiak; R Turner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Polymorphisms in the dopamine D2 receptor gene and their relationships to striatal dopamine receptor density of healthy volunteers.

Authors:  E G Jönsson; M M Nöthen; F Grünhage; L Farde; Y Nakashima; P Propping; G C Sedvall
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 15.992

7.  Hippocampal "time cells" bridge the gap in memory for discontiguous events.

Authors:  Christopher J MacDonald; Kyle Q Lepage; Uri T Eden; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Ketamine perturbs perception of the flow of time in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Jennifer T Coull; Hannah Morgan; Victoria C Cambridge; James W Moore; Francesco Giorlando; Ram Adapa; Philip R Corlett; Paul C Fletcher
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Interval timing disruptions in subjects with cerebellar lesions.

Authors:  Cynthia M Gooch; Martin Wiener; Elaine B Wencil; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Anatomy of human sensory cortices reflects inter-individual variability in time estimation.

Authors:  Sharon Gilaie-Dotan; Ryota Kanai; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-21
View more
  15 in total

1.  fMRI identifies the right inferior frontal cortex as the brain region where time interval processing is altered by negative emotional arousal.

Authors:  Micha Pfeuty; Bixente Dilharreguy; Loïc Gerlier; Michèle Allard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Imaging genetics in neurodevelopmental psychopathology.

Authors:  Marieke Klein; Marjolein van Donkelaar; Ellen Verhoef; Barbara Franke
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.568

3.  Dissecting Neural Responses to Temporal Prediction, Attention, and Memory: Effects of Reward Learning and Interoception on Time Perception.

Authors:  Dardo Tomasi; Gene-Jack Wang; Yana Studentsova; Nora D Volkow
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  DRD2: Bridging the Genome and Ingestive Behavior.

Authors:  Xue Sun; Serge Luquet; Dana M Small
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  GABA predicts time perception.

Authors:  Devin B Terhune; Sonia Russo; Jamie Near; Charlotte J Stagg; Roi Cohen Kadosh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Consensus paper: the role of the cerebellum in perceptual processes.

Authors:  Oliver Baumann; Ronald J Borra; James M Bower; Kathleen E Cullen; Christophe Habas; Richard B Ivry; Maria Leggio; Jason B Mattingley; Marco Molinari; Eric A Moulton; Michael G Paulin; Marina A Pavlova; Jeremy D Schmahmann; Arseny A Sokolov
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Individual differences in first- and second-order temporal judgment.

Authors:  Andrew W Corcoran; Christopher Groot; Aurelio Bruno; Alan Johnston; Simon J Cropper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Dopamine, time perception, and future time perspective.

Authors:  Jennifer M Mitchell; Dawn Weinstein; Taylor Vega; Andrew S Kayser
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Analysis of Genetic and Non-Genetic Factors Influencing Timing and Time Perception.

Authors:  Alex J Bartholomew; Warren H Meck; Elizabeth T Cirulli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Neurochemical changes in basal ganglia affect time perception in parkinsonians.

Authors:  Francisco Magalhães; Kaline Rocha; Victor Marinho; Jéssica Ribeiro; Thomaz Oliveira; Carla Ayres; Thalys Bento; Francisca Leite; Daya Gupta; Victor Hugo Bastos; Bruna Velasques; Pedro Ribeiro; Marco Orsini; Silmar Teixeira
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 8.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.