| Literature DB >> 22931917 |
Josefin Lysell1, Leonid Padyukov, Ingrid Kockum, Pernilla Nikamo, Mona Ståhle.
Abstract
HLA-C remains the strongest susceptibility candidate gene in psoriasis. Evidence for interaction between HLA-C and endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidase 1 (ERAP1) confined to individuals carrying the HLA-C risk allele was recently reported. Psoriasis displays wide variation, and genetic heterogeneity is likely to contribute to clinical diversity. Age at disease onset is a putative discriminator, and separating psoriasis into early- (<40 years) and late-onset disease has been useful. To sharpen the age-dependent phenotype, we compared genotypes for ERAP1 (rs26653, rs30187, and rs27524) and HLA-C*06:02 in healthy controls and cases stratified for onset of psoriasis at <10, 10-20, 20-40, and >40 years of age. This approach revealed that association with ERAP1 was confined to cases with onset between 10 and 20 years (odds ratio 1.59, 95% confidence interval: 1.28-1.98, P=0.00008) and no association was detected in cases with onset below 10 years, reflecting genetic heterogeneity within the childhood psoriasis population. In contrast to earlier findings, association with ERAP1 was neither dependent on nor interacting with HLA-C*06:02. ERAP1 single-nucleotide polymorphism rs26653, which, to our knowledge, has not previously been reported in psoriasis, is nonsynonymous, has suggestive functional consequences, and herein displays strong association with disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22931917 PMCID: PMC3547223 DOI: 10.1038/jid.2012.280
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Invest Dermatol ISSN: 0022-202X Impact factor: 8.551
Characteristics of participants
| Women (%) | 58 (49) | 112 (55) | 137 (48) | 216 (62) | 523 (55) | 1,026 (59) |
| Mean age at onset | 5.4 | 14.9 | 31.0 | 56.8 | 33.9 | |
| Plaque phenotype (%) | 96 (81) | 157 (77) | 201 (71) | 309 (89) | 763 (80) | |
| Plaque phenotype HLA-Cw06 (%) | 44 (46) | 104 (66) | 84 (42) | 55 (17) | 287 (38) | |
| Guttate phenotype (%) | 23 (19) | 46 (23) | 82 (29) | 40 (11) | 191 (20) | |
| Guttate phenotype HLA-Cw06 (%) | 19 (83) | 38 (83) | 69 (84) | 25 (57) | 151 (79) | |
Abbreviation: N, number of subjects.
Markers analyzed in ERAP1 and HLA-C*06 as well as allelic associations
| 5 | ERAP1 | rs26653 | Exon 2 | Arg127Pro | C/G | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.00006 | 1.31 (1.16–1.48) |
| 5 | ERAP1 | rs30187 | Exon 11 | Lys528Arg | T/C | 0.34 | 0.38 | 0.02 | 1.16 (1.03–1.30) |
| 5 | ERAP1 | rs27524 | 3′ UTR | None | A/G | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.11 | 1.10 (0.98–1.23) |
| 6 | HLA-C | rs10484554 | None coding | None | T/C | 0.10 | 0.28 | 1.8 × 10−65 | 3.55 (3.06–4.13) |
| 6 | HLA-C | Cw06:02 | P/N | 0.07 | 0.24 | 4.9 × 10−76 | 4.51 (3.81–5.34) | ||
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ERAP, endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidase 1; MAF, minor allele frequency; OR, odds ratio; UTR, untranslated region.
Data from www.ensembl.org.
Data from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Minor allele/major allele.
Adjusted P-value for five tests with Holm as implemented in PLINK adjust.
See Nikamo and Stahle (2012).
Allelic associations for ERAP1 and HLA-C genes in psoriasis patients stratified for age at onset (case versus controls)
| rs26653 | 0.30 | 0.4 | 1.24 (0.93–1.65) | 0.36 | 0.00008 | 1.59 (1.28–1.98) | 0.31 | 0.05 | 1.27 (1.05–1.54) | 0.30 | 0.1 | 1.21 (1.01–1.44) |
| rs30187 | 0.39 | 0.4 | 1.20 (0.91–1.57) | 0.43 | 0.0001 | 1.46 (1.18–1.80) | 0.35 | 1 | 1.03 (0.85–1.24) | 0.37 | 0.5 | 1.11 (0.93–1.31) |
| rs27524 | 0.39 | 0.4 | 1.12 (0.86–1.47) | 0.42 | 0.02 | 1.28 (1.04–1.58) | 0.36 | 1 | 0.98 (0.81–1.18) | 0.38 | 0.5 | 1.09 (0.92–1.29) |
| rs10484554 | 0.33 | 2.5 × 10−28 | 4.66 (3.48–6.24) | 0.42 | 2.9 × 10−72 | 6.65 (5.29–8.35) | 0.31 | 4.6 × 10−46 | 4.25 (3.44–5.24) | 0.15 | 0.0005 | 1.59 (1.25–2.02) |
| HLA-Cw06:02 | 0.29 | 1.2 × 10−33 | 5.71 (4.19–7.79) | 0.38 | 1.3 × 10−86 | 8.46 (6.65–10.77) | 0.28 | 8.9 × 10−58 | 5.52 (4.40–6.92) | 0.12 | 9.1 × 10−6 | 1.89 (1.45–2.46) |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ERAP, endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidase 1; MAF ca, minor allele frequency cases; OR, odds ratio.
Adjusted P-value for five tests with Holm as implemented in PLINK adjust.
Independent association of ERAP1 SNP rs26653 and HLA-C*06 in all subjects
| GG | NN | 1 | 1 |
| GC/CC | NN | 0.001 | 1.39 (1.14–1.70) |
| GG | P | <2 × 10−16 | 6.21 (4.73–8.14) |
| GC/CC | P | <2 × 10−16 | 7.17 (5.47–9.39) |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ERAP, endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidase 1; NN, negative for HLA-C*06; OR, odds ratio; P, positive for HLA-C*06; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.
Generalized linear model as implemented in R software package. Individuals with the low risk genotype for rs26653 and HLA-C*06 NN were set as baseline.
Independent association of ERAP1 SNPs and HLA-C*06 in the age group 10–20
| rs26653 | GG | NN | 1 | 1 |
| GC/CC | NN | 0.009 | 2.02 (1.19–3.43) | |
| GG | P | <2 × 10−16 | 19.43 (11.55–32.66) | |
| GC/CC | P | <2 × 10−16 | 27.11 (16.35–44.95) | |
| rs30187 | CC | NN | 1 | 1 |
| TC/TT | NN | 0.0005 | 3.10 (1.64–5.87) | |
| CC | P | <2 × 10−16 | 28.00 (14.26–54.96) | |
| TC/TT | P | <2 × 10−16 | 38.70 (20.63–72.58) | |
| rs27524 | GG | NN | 1 | 1 |
| GA/AA | NN | 0.002 | 2.68 (1.41–5.08) | |
| GG | P | <2 × 10−16 | 30.10 (15.43–58.70) | |
| GA/AA | P | <2 × 10−16 | 33.96 (18.09–63.76) |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ERAP, endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidase 1; NN, negative for HLA-C*06; OR, odds ratio; P, positive for HLA-C*06; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.
Generalized linear model as implemented in R software package. Individuals with risk alleles for respective ERAP1 SNPs and HLA-C*06.
Figure 1HLA-C*06:02 carrier and noncarrier distribution in the whole sample set. Frequency of HLAC*06:02 allele in the different age-at-onset groups.
Figure 2Association for ERAP1 SNP rs26653 stratified for HLA-Cw06 status and age. Estimates of genotype effects were calculated using logistic regression in the R software package. Individuals with the low-risk genotypes for rs26653 GG and HLA-C*06 NN were set as the baseline. The other genotype combinations were coded according to a series of dichotomous indicator variables. Odds ratios were derived by exponentiation of the relevant coefficient from the logistic regression.