Literature DB >> 22930768

Comparison of primary stability of straight-walled and tapered implants using an insertion torque device.

Giulio Menicucci1, Emanuela Pachie, Massimo Lorenzetti, Giuseppe Migliaretti, Stefano Carossa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Implant geometry has a major impact on insertion torque values and primary stability, and bone engagement during implant insertion differs according to implant morphology. Primary stability of straight-walled and tapered implants was compared using insertion torque monitoring.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 57 implants (36 straight-walled OSSEOTITE and 21 tapered OSSEOTITE NT) were inserted in 20 patients. Implant torque values and insertion times were recorded, and the data were processed and interpolated to determine torque as a function of time.
RESULTS: Tapered implants required less insertion time and a higher insertion torque than straight-walled implants; this provided better primary stability, although the success rate was 86% for tapered and 100% for straight-walled implants.
CONCLUSIONS: Tapered implants showed better primary stability than straight-walled implants but had a lower success rate. The authors suggest that in low-density bone, in which only a thin dense cortical layer can contribute to primary stability, a higher insertion torque can lead to the destruction of peri-implant bone, compromising osseointegration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22930768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  7 in total

1.  Effect of implant macrogeometry on peri-implant healing outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Luiz Carlos do Carmo Filho; Fernanda Faot; Marina de Matos Madruga; Raissa Micaella Marcello-Machado; Dimorvan Bordin; Altair Antoninha Del Bel Cury
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effect of macro-design in the primary stability of short and extra-short implants using resonance frequency analysis. An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Ramón Silva; Pablo Villalón; Felipe Cáceres
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-08-29

3.  In vitro comparison of primary stability of two implant designs in D3 bone.

Authors:  J González-Serrano; R Ortega-Aranegui; J López-Quiles
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-07-01

4.  Correlation between Implant Geometry, Bone Density, and the Insertion Torque/Depth Integral: A Study on Bovine Ribs.

Authors:  Danilo Alessio Di Stefano; Paolo Arosio; Vittoria Perrotti; Giovanna Iezzi; Antonio Scarano; Adriano Piattelli
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-05

5.  Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability.

Authors:  Tanja Grobecker-Karl; Anthony Dickinson; Siegfried Heckmann; Matthias Karl; Constanze Steiner
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Effect of implant macro-design on primary stability: A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Naroa Lozano-Carrascal; Oscar Salomó-Coll; Marta Gilabert-Cerdà; Nuria Farré-Pagés; Jordi Gargallo-Albiol; Federico Hernández-Alfaro
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-03-01

7.  Does intraoperative bone density testing correlate with parameters of primary implant stability? A pilot study in minipigs.

Authors:  Tanja Grobecker-Karl; Victor Palarie; Sonja Schneider; Matthias Karl
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2019-09-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.