| Literature DB >> 22925689 |
An Li1, Nina Pfelzer, Robbert Zuijderwijk, Peter Punt.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aspergillus niger was selected as a host for producing itaconic acid due to its versatile and tolerant character in various growth environments, and its extremely high capacity of accumulating the precursor of itaconic acid: citric acid. Expressing the CAD gene from Aspergillus terreus opened the metabolic pathway towards itaconic acid in A. niger. In order to increase the production level, we continued by modifying its genome and optimizing cultivation media.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22925689 PMCID: PMC3472327 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6750-12-57
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biotechnol ISSN: 1472-6750 Impact factor: 2.563
Composition of the 20 cultivation media. 1 is the reference medium of itaconic acid production by
| | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose | 100 | 50 | 140 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| NaNO3 | - | - | - | 0.5 | 2.4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| (NH4)2SO4 | 2.36 | 2.36 | 2.36 | - | - | - | - | 2.36 | 2.36 | 2.36 |
| NH4NO3 | - | - | - | - | - | 3.1 | 5 | - | - | - |
| KH2PO4 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 3 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| MgSO4 x 7 H2O | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.24 | 2.2 |
| CuSO4 * 5 H2O | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 |
| FeIIISO4 * 7 H2O | 0.0055 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 |
| FeCl3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| MnCl2 * 4 H2O | 0.0007 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| ZnSO4 * 7 H2O | 0.0013 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 |
| NiCl2 * 6 H2O | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| KCl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| NaCl | 0.074 | 0.074 | 0.074 | 0.074 | 0.074 | 0.074 | 0.074 | 0.074 | 0.074 | 0.074 |
| CaCl2 * 2 H2O | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Uridine | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 |
| | ||||||||||
| | ||||||||||
| Glucose | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| NaNO3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2.4 |
| NH4SO4 | 2.36 | 2.36 | 2.36 | 2.36 | 2.36 | 2.36 | 2.36 | 2.36 | 2.36 | - |
| NH4NO3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| KH2PO4 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| MgSO4 x 7 H2O | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| CuSO4 * 5 H2O | - | 0.0025 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 |
| FeIIISO4 * 7 H2O | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0138 | - | - | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 |
| FeCl3 | - | - | - | 0.0006 | 0.0001 | - | - | - | - | - |
| MnCl2 * 4 H2O | - | - | - | - | - | 0.007 | - | - | - | - |
| ZnSO4 * 7 H2O | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.022 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 |
| NiCl2 * 6 H2O | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.0005 | - | - |
| KCl | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.52 |
| NaCl | 0.074 | 0.074 | 0.074 | 0.074 | 0.074 | 0.074 | 0.074 | 0.074 | 2 | - |
| CaCl2 * 2 H2O | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.2 | - |
| Uridine | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 | 2.45 |
Media components and their ranges from literature studies used for optimization
| C | Glucose | 50 | 140 | [ |
| N | NaNO3 | 0.5 | 2.4 | [ |
| | NH4SO4 | 2.36 | 2.36 | [ |
| | NH4NO3 | 3.1 | 5 | [ |
| P | KH2PO4 | 0.11 | 3 | [ |
| Mg | MgSO4 x 7 H2O | 0.24 | 2.2 | [ |
| Cu | CuSO4 x 5 H2O | 0 | 0.0025 | [ |
| Fe | Fe2SO4 x 7 H2O | 0.0006 | 0.0138 | [ |
| | FeCl3 | 0.0006 | 0.0001 | [ |
| Mn | MnCl2 x 4 H2O | 0 | 0.007 | [ |
| Zn | ZnSO4 x 7 H2O | 0.0006 | 0.022 | [ |
| Ni | NiCl2 x 6 H2O | 0 | 0.0005 | [ |
| K | KCl | 0.52 | 0.52 | [ |
| | NaCl | 0,074 | 2 | [ |
| CaCl2 * 2H2O | 0,13 | 0,2 | [ | |
Figure 1Itaconic acid production of transformants. A ): Itaconic acid HPLC analysis of micro titer plate screening of A. niger CAD transformants. B): Itaconic acid screening results in micro-titer plate for the selected GPD and HBD transformants. The parental strain CAD 10.1 was used as a control. The transformants with the highest production and lowest production surrounded by an oval circle were selected further for Southern blot analysis.
Figure 2Itaconic acid and citric acid production of in different media. Itaconic acid (2A) and Citric acid (2B) level in micro-titer screening cultures using 20 different media. Standard deviations were less than 6 %.
Itaconic acid level in micro-titer screening culture of strain AB 1.13 CAD + GPD 4.3 and AB 1.13 CAD + FHB 2.5 with media 1, 8, 11, 12, 13, 20 and 20+ (20+: combined medium of 8, 12 and 20)
| | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.134 (±0.014) | 0.134 (±0.025) | |
| 0.238 (±0.000) | 0.249 (±0.059) | |
| 0.127 (±0.017) | 0.072 (±0.032) | |
| 0.168 (±0.011) | 0.076 (±0.020) | |
| 0.237 (±0.001) | 0.218 (±0.028) | |
| 0.080 (±0.011) | 0.230 (±0.020) |
Figure 3Itaconic-, citric- and oxalic acid production in fermentation media of . Organic acid content (itaconic- citric- and oxalic- acid) of A. niger strain AB 1.13 CAD pyr + in Medium 12 with varying copper concentration. (♦—Medium12-Cu with 0.005 mM Cu2+; ■—Medium12 with 0.01 mM Cu2+ ; ▲—Medium12 + Cu with 0.02 mM Cu2+) (EFT: Electronic Fermentation Time).
Figure 4Biomass growth and glucose consumption of in fermentations with varying copper concentrations. Biomass determination of mycelium in batch fermentation (♦—Medium12-Cu with 0.005 mM Cu2+; ■—Medium12 with 0.01 mM Cu2+ ; ▴—Medium12 + Cu with 0.02 mM Cu2+). The glucose consumption of three batch fermentations were shown on the secondary Axis (X— Medium12-Cu with 0.005 mM Cu2+; □—Medium12 with 0.01 mM Cu2+ ; ●—Medium12 + Cu with 0.02 mM Cu2+).
Itaconic acid levels among the main three organic acids (itaconic-, citric- and oxalic acid) in batch cultivation using different copper concentrations
| | | |||
| 0.086 | 1.774 | 5.851 | 10% | |
| 1.226 | 3.323 | 9.722 | 9% | |
| 1.453 | 3.857 | 11.557 | 9% | |
| | | | | |
| 1.052 | 6.975 | 0.050 | 13% | |
| 1.490 | 8.877 | 0.062 | 14% | |
| 1.639 | 8.923 | 0.093 | 15% | |
| | | | | |
| 1.430 | 5.128 | 1.262 | 18% | |
| 1.768 | 6.229 | 1.453 | 19% | |
| 1.945 | 6.570 | 1.473 | 20% | |
The levels are averages of the duplicate measurements (g/L) (end concentrations deviate less than 5 %).