Literature DB >> 22923854

Adaptive Programming Improves Outcomes in Drug Court: An Experimental Trial.

Douglas B Marlowe1, David S Festinger, Karen L Dugosh, Kathleen M Benasutti, Gloria Fox, Jason R Croft.   

Abstract

Prior studies in Drug Courts reported improved outcomes when participants were matched to schedules of judicial status hearings based on their criminological risk level. The current experiment determined whether incremental efficacy could be gained by periodically adjusting the schedule of status hearings and clinical case-management sessions in response to participants' ensuing performance in the program. The adjustments were made pursuant to a priori criteria specified in an adaptive algorithm. Results confirmed that participants in the full adaptive condition (n = 62) were more than twice as likely as those assigned to baseline-matching only (n = 63) to be drug-abstinent during the first 18 weeks of the program; however, graduation rates and the average time to case resolution were not significantly different. The positive effects of the adaptive program appear to have stemmed from holding noncompliant participants more accountable for meeting their attendance obligations in the program. Directions for future research and practice implications are discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22923854      PMCID: PMC3424518          DOI: 10.1177/0093854811432525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crim Justice Behav        ISSN: 0093-8548


  11 in total

1.  Status hearings in drug court: when more is less and less is more.

Authors:  David S Festinger; Douglas B Marlowe; Patricia A Lee; Kimberly C Kirby; Gregory Bovasso; A Thomas McLellan
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 2.  A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions.

Authors:  Linda M Collins; Susan A Murphy; Karen L Bierman
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2004-09

3.  Perceived deterrence and outcomes in drug court.

Authors:  Douglas B Marlowe; David S Festinger; Carol Foltz; Patricia A Lee; Nicholas S Patapis
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2005

4.  Adapting judicial supervision to the risk level of drug offenders: discharge and 6-month outcomes from a prospective matching study.

Authors:  Douglas B Marlowe; David S Festinger; Karen L Dugosh; Patricia A Lee; Kathleen M Benasutti
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Matching Judicial Supervision to Clients' Risk Status in Drug Court.

Authors:  Douglas B Marlowe; David S Festinger; Patricia A Lee; Karen L Dugosh; Kathleen M Benasutti
Journal:  Crime Delinq       Date:  2006

6.  Adaptive Interventions in Drug Court: A Pilot Experiment.

Authors:  Douglas B Marlowe; David S Festinger; Patricia L Arabia; Karen L Dugosh; Kathleen M Benasutti; Jason R Croft; James R McKay
Journal:  Crim Justice Rev       Date:  2008

7.  Developing adaptive treatment strategies in substance abuse research.

Authors:  Susan A Murphy; Kevin G Lynch; David Oslin; James R McKay; Tom TenHave
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 8.  Substance abuse and dependence in prisoners: a systematic review.

Authors:  Seena Fazel; Parveen Bains; Helen Doll
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Treating drug abuse and addiction in the criminal justice system: improving public health and safety.

Authors:  Redonna K Chandler; Bennett W Fletcher; Nora D Volkow
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Adaptive interventions may optimize outcomes in drug courts: a pilot study.

Authors:  Douglas B Marlowe; David S Festinger; Patricia L Arabia; Karen L Dugosh; Kathleen M Benasutti; Jason R Croft
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  6 in total

1.  IDENTIFYING PREDICTORS OF SUBSTANCE USE AND RECIDIVISM OUTCOME TRAJECTORIES AMONG DRUG TREATMENT COURT CLIENTS.

Authors:  John L Wilson; Sanjukta Bandyopadhyay; Hongmei Yang; Catherine Cerulli; Diane S Morse
Journal:  Crim Justice Behav       Date:  2017-11-07

2.  Control Engineering Methods for the Design of Robust Behavioral Treatments.

Authors:  Korkut Bekiroglu; Constantino Lagoa; Suzan A Murphy; Stephanie T Lanza
Journal:  IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.485

3.  An Experimental Trial of Adaptive Programming in Drug Court: Outcomes at 6, 12 and 18 Months.

Authors:  Douglas B Marlowe; David S Festinger; Karen L Dugosh; Kathleen M Benasutti; Gloria Fox; Ashley Harron
Journal:  J Exp Criminol       Date:  2014-06-01

4.  Using decision lists to construct interpretable and parsimonious treatment regimes.

Authors:  Yichi Zhang; Eric B Laber; Anastasios Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A SMART data analysis method for constructing adaptive treatment strategies for substance use disorders.

Authors:  Inbal Nahum-Shani; Ashkan Ertefaie; Xi Lucy Lu; Kevin G Lynch; James R McKay; David W Oslin; Daniel Almirall
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Addressing alcohol use and problems in mandated college students: a randomized clinical trial using stepped care.

Authors:  Brian Borsari; John T P Hustad; Nadine R Mastroleo; Tracy O'Leary Tevyaw; Nancy P Barnett; Christopher W Kahler; Erica Eaton Short; Peter M Monti
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2012-08-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.