Literature DB >> 22923726

Perceptual consequences of feature-based attentional enhancement and suppression.

Tiffany C Ho1, Scott Brown, Newton A Abuyo, Eun-Hae J Ku, John T Serences.   

Abstract

Feature-based attention has been shown to enhance the responses of neurons tuned to an attended feature while simultaneously suppressing responses of neurons tuned to unattended features. However, the influence of these suppressive neuronal-level modulations on perception is not well understood. Here, we investigated the perceptual consequences of feature-based attention by having subjects judge which of four random dot patterns (RDPs) contained a motion signal (Experiment 1) or which of four RDPs contained the most salient nonrandom motion signal (Experiment 2). Subjects viewed pre-cues which validly, invalidly, or neutrally cued the direction of the target RDP. Behavioral data were fit using the linear ballistic accumulator (LBA) model; the model design that best described the data revealed that the rate of sensory evidence accumulation (drift rate) was highest on valid trials and systematically decreased until the cued direction and the target direction were orthogonal. These results demonstrate behavioral correlates of both feature-based attentional enhancement and suppression.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22923726      PMCID: PMC4503215          DOI: 10.1167/12.8.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  60 in total

1.  The psychophysics of visual search.

Authors:  J Palmer; P Verghese; M Pavel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons.

Authors:  J H Reynolds; T Pasternak; R Desimone
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displays.

Authors:  M P Eckstein; J P Thomas; J Palmer; S S Shimozaki
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

4.  A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching.

Authors:  T Van Zandt; H Colonius; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

5.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model.

Authors:  M Usher; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Global feature-based attention for motion and color.

Authors:  Melissa Sàenz; Giedrius T Buraĉas; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Attentional modulation strength in cortical area MT depends on stimulus contrast.

Authors:  Julio Martínez-Trujillo; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-07-18       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  Varying target prevalence reveals two dissociable decision criteria in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Michael J Van Wert
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Melissa Saenz; Giedrius T Buracas; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  16 in total

1.  Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Alex L White; Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Suppression effects in feature-based attention.

Authors:  Yixue Wang; James Miller; Taosheng Liu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Feature-based attention modulates surround suppression.

Authors:  Anastasia V Flevaris; Scott O Murray
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The role of speed in ADHD-related working memory deficits: A time-based resource-sharing and diffusion model account.

Authors:  Alexander Weigard; Cynthia Huang-Pollock
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-12-21

5.  The profile of attentional modulation to visual features.

Authors:  Ming W H Fang; Taosheng Liu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Evaluating the consequences of impaired monitoring of learned behavior in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder using a Bayesian hierarchical model of choice response time.

Authors:  Alexander Weigard; Cynthia Huang-Pollock; Scott Brown
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  Feature-based attention: effects and control.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-03-23

8.  Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Sean Deering; Annalisa M Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Feature-Based Attention and Feature-Based Expectation.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Feature expectation heightens visual sensitivity during fine orientation discrimination.

Authors:  Sam Cheadle; Tobias Egner; Valentin Wyart; Claire Wu; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.