Literature DB >> 10909235

A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displays.

M P Eckstein1, J P Thomas, J Palmer, S S Shimozaki.   

Abstract

Recently, quantitative models based on signal detection theory have been successfully applied to the prediction of human accuracy in visual search for a target that differs from distractors along a single attribute (feature search). The present paper extends these models for visual search accuracy to multidimensional search displays in which the target differs from the distractors along more than one feature dimension (conjunction, disjunction, and triple conjunction displays). The model assumes that each element in the display elicits a noisy representation for each of the relevant feature dimensions. The observer combines the representations across feature dimensions to obtain a single decision variable, and the stimulus with the maximum value determines the response. The model accurately predicts human experimental data on visual search accuracy in conjunctions and disjunctions of contrast and orientation. The model accounts for performance degradation without resorting to a limited-capacity spatially localized and temporally serial mechanism by which to bind information across feature dimensions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Space Human Factors; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10909235     DOI: 10.3758/bf03212096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  57 in total

1.  Mechanisms of selective attention: response enhancement, noise reduction, and efficient pooling of sensory responses.

Authors:  John T Serences
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Anatomical constraints on attention: hemifield independence is a signature of multifocal spatial selection.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Jonathan Gill; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions.

Authors:  Rani Moran; Michael Zehetleitner; Heinrich René Liesefeld; Hermann J Müller; Marius Usher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

4.  Are there capacity limitations in symmetry perception?

Authors:  Liqiang Huang; Harold Pashler; Justin A Junge
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

5.  A search model and figure of merit for observer data acquired according to the free-response paradigm.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Attention speeds processing across eccentricity: feature and conjunction searches.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Anna Marie Giordano; Brian McElree
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  No need for inhibitory tagging of locations in visual search.

Authors:  Johan Hulleman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

Review 8.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Generating a taxonomy of spatially cued attention for visual discrimination: effects of judgment precision and set size on attention.

Authors:  Richard Hetley; Barbara Anne Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Sean Deering; Annalisa M Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.