Literature DB >> 22923718

Effect of multipeak spectral modeling of fat for liver iron and fat quantification: correlation of biopsy with MR imaging results.

Jens-Peter Kühn1, Diego Hernando, Alejandro Muñoz del Rio, Matthias Evert, Stephan Kannengiesser, Henry Völzke, Birger Mensel, Ralf Puls, Norbert Hosten, Scott B Reeder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of the multipeak spectral modeling of fat on R2* values as measures of liver iron and on the quantification of liver fat fraction, with biopsy as the reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Patients with liver disease (n = 95; 50 men, 45 women; mean age, 57.2 years±14.1 [standard deviation]) underwent a nontargeted liver biopsy, and 97 biopsy samples were reviewed for steatosis and iron grades. MR imaging at 1.5 T was performed 24-72 hours after biopsy by using a three-echo three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence for water and fat separation. Data were reconstructed off-line, correcting for T1 and T2* effects. Fat fraction and R2* maps (1/T2*) were reconstructed and differences in R2* and steatosis grades with and without multipeak modeling of fat were tested by using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to assess fat fractions and steatosis grades. Linear regression analysis was performed to compare the fat fraction for both models.
RESULTS: Mean steatosis grade at biopsy ranged from 0% to 95%. Biopsy specimens in 26 of 97 patients (27%) showed liver iron (15 mild, six moderate, and five severe). In all 71 samples without iron, a strong increase in the apparent R2* was observed with increasing steatosis grade when single-peak modeling of fat was used (P=.001). When multipeak modeling was used, there were no differences in the apparent R2* as a function of steatosis grading (P=.645), and R2* values agreed closely with those reported in the literature. Good correlation between fat fraction and steatosis grade was observed (rS=0.85) both without and with spectral modeling.
CONCLUSION: In the presence of fat, multipeak spectral modeling of fat improves the agreement between R2* and liver iron. Single-peak modeling of fat leads to underestimation of liver fat. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22923718      PMCID: PMC3447175          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  46 in total

Review 1.  Liver biopsy.

Authors:  A A Bravo; S G Sheth; S Chopra
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Cardiovascular T2-star (T2*) magnetic resonance for the early diagnosis of myocardial iron overload.

Authors:  L J Anderson; S Holden; B Davis; E Prescott; C C Charrier; N H Bunce; D N Firmin; B Wonke; J Porter; J M Walker; D J Pennell
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  Ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy: indications, risks, and technique.

Authors:  Laurian Copel; Jacob Sosna; Jonathan B Kruskal; Robert A Kane
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2003

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging and assessment of liver iron content in genetic hemochromatosis.

Authors:  D Guyader; Y Gandon; J Y Robert; J F Heautot; H Jouanolle; C Jacquelinet; M Messner; Y Deugnier; P Brissot
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 25.083

5.  MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results.

Authors:  Cedric M J de Bazelaire; Guillaume D Duhamel; Neil M Rofsky; David C Alsop
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Hepatic iron overload: diagnosis and quantification by noninvasive imaging.

Authors:  J L Chezmar; R C Nelson; J A Malko; M E Bernardino
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1990

7.  Noninvasive quantification of hepatic fat content using three-echo dixon magnetic resonance imaging with correction for T2* relaxation effects.

Authors:  Jens-Peter Kühn; Matthias Evert; Nele Friedrich; Stephan Kannengiesser; Julia Mayerle; Robert Thiel; Markus M Lerch; Frank Dombrowski; Birger Mensel; Norbert Hosten; Ralf Puls
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Non-invasive assessment of hepatic iron stores by MRI.

Authors:  Y Gandon; D Olivié; D Guyader; C Aubé; F Oberti; V Sebille; Y Deugnier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Sampling variability on percutaneous liver biopsy.

Authors:  W Abdi; J C Millan; E Mezey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1979-06

10.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: diagnostic and fat-grading accuracy of low-flip-angle multiecho gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Takeshi Yokoo; Mark Bydder; Gavin Hamilton; Michael S Middleton; Anthony C Gamst; Tanya Wolfson; Tarek Hassanein; Heather M Patton; Joel E Lavine; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  71 in total

Review 1.  [Modern magnetic resonance imaging of the liver].

Authors:  D M Hedderich; K Weiss; D Maintz; T Persigehl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  On the confounding effect of temperature on chemical shift-encoded fat quantification.

Authors:  Diego Hernando; Samir D Sharma; Harald Kramer; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Sensitivity of chemical shift-encoded fat quantification to calibration of fat MR spectrum.

Authors:  Xiaoke Wang; Diego Hernando; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Automated two-point dixon screening for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis and siderosis: comparison with R2-relaxometry and chemical shift-based sequences.

Authors:  B Henninger; H Zoller; S Rauch; M Schocke; S Kannengiesser; X Zhong; G Reiter; W Jaschke; C Kremser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  [Techniques for quantification of liver fat in risk stratification of diabetics].

Authors:  J-P Kühn; M C Spoerl; C Mahlke; K Hegenscheid
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Evaluation of six-point modified dixon and magnetic resonance spectroscopy for fat quantification: a fat-water-iron phantom study.

Authors:  Kei Fukuzawa; Tatsuya Hayashi; Junji Takahashi; Chiharu Yoshihara; Masakatsu Tano; Jun'ichi Kotoku; Satoshi Saitoh
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-08-02

Review 7.  Quantification of liver iron with MRI: state of the art and remaining challenges.

Authors:  Diego Hernando; Yakir S Levin; Claude B Sirlin; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Free-breathing quantification of hepatic fat in healthy children and children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease using a multi-echo 3-D stack-of-radial MRI technique.

Authors:  Tess Armstrong; Karrie V Ly; Smruthi Murthy; Shahnaz Ghahremani; Grace Hyun J Kim; Kara L Calkins; Holden H Wu
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-05-04

Review 9.  Measurement of liver fat fraction and iron with MRI and MR spectroscopy techniques.

Authors:  Puneet Sharma; Maria Altbach; Jean-Philippe Galons; Bobby Kalb; Diego R Martin
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

10.  Quantification of liver proton-density fat fraction in 7.1T preclinical MR systems: Impact of the fitting technique.

Authors:  Christoph Mahlke; Diego Hernando; Christina Jahn; Antonio Cigliano; Till Ittermann; Anne Mössler; Marie-Luise Kromrey; Grazyna Domaska; Scott B Reeder; Jens-Peter Kühn
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.