Literature DB >> 21804438

Eccentric gaze direction in patients with central field loss.

Cornelis A Verezen1, Carel B Hoyng, Carina F M Meulendijks, Jan E E Keunen, B Jeroen Klevering.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study describes the binocular eccentric gaze direction (EGD) of 434 patients with binocular central field loss and presents a comparison with other studies on eccentric gaze behavior.
METHODS: We reviewed the records of 434 patients with bilateral central scotomas. Eligible patients had not received eccentric viewing training and demonstrated a spontaneously developed eccentric gaze behavior. Data were collected on monocular and binocular EGD, visual acuity, and underlying ocular pathology. Findings concerning the EGD were compared with other studies that evaluated gaze behavior in patients with central field loss.
RESULTS: In the group of 434 patients, age-related macular disease was the most frequent pathology (77%). The majority of these patients demonstrated a binocular EGD (bEGD) to the right (50%). In 25% of the patients, a superior bEGD was found. Less often, a bEGD to the left (14%) and to inferior (11%) were encountered. Review of the literature indicates that the majority of patients developed a monocular EGD in the superior direction.
CONCLUSIONS: This is a study on bEGD behavior in a large population of patients with bilateral central scotomas. The bEGD was guided by the gaze of the better-seeing eye. The preference for a bEGD to the right differs from findings of previous studies. Review of the literature suggests that not only the ocular pathology but also the method of investigation is most likely to influence the observed EGD. Most studies evaluated the location of the preferred retinal locus using a monocular technique; this may not reflect an individual's actual binocular behavior as it relates to activities of daily living.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21804438     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31822891e0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  5 in total

1.  Scotoma Visibility and Reading Rate with Bilateral Central Scotomas.

Authors:  Joshua D Pratt; Scott B Stevenson; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Driving with central field loss I: effect of central scotomas on responses to hazards.

Authors:  P Matthew Bronstad; Alex R Bowers; Amanda Albu; Robert Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Volume perimetry: measurement in depth of visual field loss.

Authors:  Premnandhini Satgunam; Henry L Apfelbaum; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Driving with Central Visual Field Loss II: How Scotomas above or below the Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL) Affect Hazard Detection in a Driving Simulator.

Authors:  P Matthew Bronstad; Amanda Albu; Alex R Bowers; Robert Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Visual attention measures predict pedestrian detection in central field loss: a pilot study.

Authors:  Concetta F Alberti; Todd Horowitz; P Matthew Bronstad; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.