OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of imaging myocardial infarction with a two-dimensional (2D) single-shot inversion-recovery (IR)-gradient-echo (GE) sequence compared with a standard 2D segmented IR-GE sequence at 1.5 T using a dedicated cardiac coil. METHODS: 22 patients with myocardial infarction documented in the past 3-12 months were examined at 1.5 T using a 5 channel cardiac coil. Imaging of delayed enhancement was performed 15 min after administration of 0.2 mmol of gadopentetate dimeglumine per kilogram of body weight. Immediately after completion of the single-shot sequence, which allows for coverage of the entire ventricle during a single breath-hold with nine slices, the segmented IR sequence was started. Infarct volumes, infarct transmurality and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of infarcted and healthy myocardium were compared between both techniques. RESULTS: Despite a moderate, non-significant loss of CNR (CNR(single-shot IR)=31.2±4.1; CNR(segmented IR)=37.9±4.1; p=0.405), the 2D single-shot technique correctly determined infarct size when compared with the standard 2D segmented IR-GE sequence. Assessment of both infarct volume (r=0.95; p<0.0001) and transmurality (r=0.97; p<0.0001) is possible, with excellent correlation of both techniques. CONCLUSION: Single-shot delayed enhancement imaging during a single breath-hold is feasible at 1.5 T with the use of a dedicated cardiac coil. Despite a moderately lower CNR, the single-shot technique allows for fast and accurate determination of infarct size with high spatial resolution and has the potential to reduce electrocardiogram and breathing artefacts.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of imaging myocardial infarction with a two-dimensional (2D) single-shot inversion-recovery (IR)-gradient-echo (GE) sequence compared with a standard 2D segmented IR-GE sequence at 1.5 T using a dedicated cardiac coil. METHODS: 22 patients with myocardial infarction documented in the past 3-12 months were examined at 1.5 T using a 5 channel cardiac coil. Imaging of delayed enhancement was performed 15 min after administration of 0.2 mmol of gadopentetate dimeglumine per kilogram of body weight. Immediately after completion of the single-shot sequence, which allows for coverage of the entire ventricle during a single breath-hold with nine slices, the segmented IR sequence was started. Infarct volumes, infarct transmurality and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of infarcted and healthy myocardium were compared between both techniques. RESULTS: Despite a moderate, non-significant loss of CNR (CNR(single-shot IR)=31.2±4.1; CNR(segmented IR)=37.9±4.1; p=0.405), the 2D single-shot technique correctly determined infarct size when compared with the standard 2D segmented IR-GE sequence. Assessment of both infarct volume (r=0.95; p<0.0001) and transmurality (r=0.97; p<0.0001) is possible, with excellent correlation of both techniques. CONCLUSION: Single-shot delayed enhancement imaging during a single breath-hold is feasible at 1.5 T with the use of a dedicated cardiac coil. Despite a moderately lower CNR, the single-shot technique allows for fast and accurate determination of infarct size with high spatial resolution and has the potential to reduce electrocardiogram and breathing artefacts.
Authors: O P Simonetti; R J Kim; D S Fieno; H B Hillenbrand; E Wu; J M Bundy; J P Finn; R M Judd Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: R J Kim; E Wu; A Rafael; E L Chen; M A Parker; O Simonetti; F J Klocke; R O Bonow; R M Judd Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-11-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anja Wagner; Heiko Mahrholdt; Thomas A Holly; Michael D Elliott; Matthias Regenfus; Michele Parker; Francis J Klocke; Robert O Bonow; Raymond J Kim; Robert M Judd Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-02-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: David Bello; Dipan J Shah; George M Farah; Silvia Di Luzio; Michele Parker; Maryl R Johnson; William G Cotts; Francis J Klocke; Robert O Bonow; Robert M Judd; Mihai Gheorghiade; Raymond J Kim Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: David S Fieno; Hanns B Hillenbrand; Wolfgang G Rehwald; Kathleen R Harris; Robert S Decker; Michele A Parker; Francis J Klocke; Raymond J Kim; Robert M Judd Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-06-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers; Walter H Backes; Raymond J Kim; Gabriel Snoep; Anton P M Gorgels; Valeria Lima Passos; Johannes Waltenberger; Harry J G M Crijns; Simon Schalla Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Arlene Sirajuddin; S Mojdeh Mirmomen; Seth J Kligerman; Daniel W Groves; Allen P Burke; Faraz Kureshi; Charles S White; Andrew E Arai Journal: Radiographics Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 6.312