Literature DB >> 22917964

Delivery quality assurance with ArcCHECK.

Christopher Neilson1, Michael Klein, Rob Barnett, Slav Yartsev.   

Abstract

Radiation therapy requires delivery quality assurance (DQA) to ensure that treatment is accurate and closely follows the plan. We report our experience with the ArcCHECK phantom and investigate its potential optimization for the DQA process. One-hundred seventy DQA plans from 84 patients were studied. Plans were classified into 2 groups: those with the target situated on the diodes of the ArcCHECK (D plans) and those with the target situated at the center (C plans). Gamma pass rates for 8 target sites were examined. The parameters used to analyze the data included 3%/3 mm with the Van Dyk percent difference criteria (VD) on, 3%/3 mm with the VD off, 2%/2 mm with the VD on, and x/3 mm with the VD on and the percentage dosimetric agreement "x" for diode plans adjusted. D plans typically displayed maximum planned dose (MPD) on the cylindrical surface containing ArcCHECK diodes than center plans, resulting in inflated gamma pass rates. When this was taken into account by adjusting the percentage dosimetric agreement, C plans outperformed D plans by an average of 3.5%. ArcCHECK can streamline the DQA process, consuming less time and resources than radiographic films. It is unnecessary to generate 2 DQA plans for each patient; a single center plan will suffice. Six of 8 target sites consistently displayed pass rates well within our acceptance criteria; the lesser performance of head and neck and spinal sites can be attributed to marginally lower doses and increased high gradient of plans.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22917964     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2012.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  10 in total

1.  Patient-related quality assurance with different combinations of treatment planning systems, techniques, and machines : A multi-institutional survey.

Authors:  Beatrice Steiniger; René Berger; Sabine Eilzer; Christine Kornhuber; Kathleen Lorenz; Torsten Peil; Carsten Reiffenstuhl; Johannes Schilz; Dirk Schröder; Michael Schwedas; Stephanie Pensold; Mathias Walke; Kirsten Weibert; Ulrich Wolf; Tilo Wiezorek
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Validation of an improved helical diode array and dose reconstruction software using TG-244 datasets and stringent dose comparison criteria.

Authors:  Saeed Ahmed; Benjamin Nelms; Jakub Kozelka; Geoffrey Zhang; Eduardo Moros; Vladimir Feygelman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  The sensitivity of ArcCHECK-based gamma analysis to manufactured errors in helical tomotherapy radiation delivery.

Authors:  Alistair K Templeton; James C H Chu; Julius V Turian
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Density scaling of phantom materials for a 3D dose verification system.

Authors:  Kensuke Tani; Yukio Fujita; Akihisa Wakita; Ryohei Miyasaka; Ryuzo Uehara; Takumi Kodama; Yuya Suzuki; Ako Aikawa; Norifumi Mizuno; Jiro Kawamori; Hidetoshi Saitoh
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Evaluation of parameters affecting gamma passing rate in patient-specific QAs for multiple brain lesions IMRS treatments using ray-station treatment planning system.

Authors:  Elahheh Salari; E Ishmael Parsai; Diana Shvydka; Nicholas Niven Sperling
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Comparison of dose calculations between pencil-beam and Monte Carlo algorithms of the iPlan RT in arc therapy using a homogenous phantom with 3DVH software.

Authors:  Jin Ho Song; Hun-Joo Shin; Chul Seung Kay; Soo-Min Chae; Seok Hyun Son
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Performance Characteristics of an Independent Dose Verification Program for Helical Tomotherapy.

Authors:  Isaac C F Chang; Jeff Chen; Slav Yartsev
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

8.  Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Jung-In Kim; Chang Heon Choi; Hong-Gyun Wu; Jin Ho Kim; Kyubo Kim; Jong Min Park
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-17

9.  Initial clinical experience with ArcCHECK for IMRT/VMAT QA.

Authors:  Michalis Aristophanous; Yelin Suh; Pai C Chi; Luke J Whittlesey; Scott LaNeave; Mary K Martel
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Commissioning and comprehensive evaluation of the ArcCHECK cylindrical diode array for VMAT pretreatment delivery QA.

Authors:  Vibha Chaswal; Michael Weldon; Nilendu Gupta; Arnab Chakravarti; Yi Rong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.