OBJECTIVES: This paper investigates the effects of sustained practice and x-ray system technical changes on the radiation dose administered to adult patients during invasive cardiovascular procedures. BACKGROUND: It is desirable to reduce radiation dose associated with medical imaging to minimize the risk of adverse radiation effects to both patients and staff. Several clinical practice and technical changes to elevate radiation awareness and reduce patient radiation dose were implemented under the guidance of a cardiovascular invasive labs radiation safety committee. Practice changes included: intraprocedure radiation dose announcements; reporting of procedures for which the air-kerma exceeded 6,000 mGy, including procedure air-kerma in the clinical report; and establishing compulsory radiation safety training for fellows. Technical changes included establishing standard x-ray imaging protocols, increased use of x-ray beam spectral filters, reducing the detector target dose for fluoroscopy and acquisition imaging, and reducing the fluoroscopy frame rate to 7.5 s(-1). METHODS: Patient- and procedure-specific cumulative skin dose was calculated from air-kerma values and evaluated retrospectively over a period of 3 years. Data were categorized to include all procedures, percutaneous coronary interventions, coronary angiography, noncardiac vascular angiography and interventions, and interventions to treat structural heart disease. Statistical analysis was based on a comparison of the cumulative skin dose for procedures performed during the first and last quarters of the 3-year study period. RESULTS: A total of 18,115 procedures were performed by 27 staff cardiologists and 65 fellows-in-training. Considering all procedures, the mean cumulative skin dose decreased from 969 to 568 mGy (40% reduction) over 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates that a philosophy of radiation safety, implemented through a collection of sustained practice and x-ray system changes, can result in a significant decrease in the radiation dose administered to patients during invasive cardiovascular procedures.
OBJECTIVES: This paper investigates the effects of sustained practice and x-ray system technical changes on the radiation dose administered to adult patients during invasive cardiovascular procedures. BACKGROUND: It is desirable to reduce radiation dose associated with medical imaging to minimize the risk of adverse radiation effects to both patients and staff. Several clinical practice and technical changes to elevate radiation awareness and reduce patient radiation dose were implemented under the guidance of a cardiovascular invasive labs radiation safety committee. Practice changes included: intraprocedure radiation dose announcements; reporting of procedures for which the air-kerma exceeded 6,000 mGy, including procedure air-kerma in the clinical report; and establishing compulsory radiation safety training for fellows. Technical changes included establishing standard x-ray imaging protocols, increased use of x-ray beam spectral filters, reducing the detector target dose for fluoroscopy and acquisition imaging, and reducing the fluoroscopy frame rate to 7.5 s(-1). METHODS:Patient- and procedure-specific cumulative skin dose was calculated from air-kerma values and evaluated retrospectively over a period of 3 years. Data were categorized to include all procedures, percutaneous coronary interventions, coronary angiography, noncardiac vascular angiography and interventions, and interventions to treat structural heart disease. Statistical analysis was based on a comparison of the cumulative skin dose for procedures performed during the first and last quarters of the 3-year study period. RESULTS: A total of 18,115 procedures were performed by 27 staff cardiologists and 65 fellows-in-training. Considering all procedures, the mean cumulative skin dose decreased from 969 to 568 mGy (40% reduction) over 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates that a philosophy of radiation safety, implemented through a collection of sustained practice and x-ray system changes, can result in a significant decrease in the radiation dose administered to patients during invasive cardiovascular procedures.
Authors: Andrew C Glatz; Akash Patel; Xiaowei Zhu; Yoav Dori; Brian D Hanna; Matthew J Gillespie; Jonathan J Rome Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2014-01-18 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Alejandro Aquino; Ali J Khiabani; Matthew C Henn; Alan Zajarias; Spencer J Melby; Marc Sintek; John Lasala; Puja Kachroo; Eric Novak; Hersh S Maniar Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2019-07-06 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: E Kuon; S B Felix; K Weitmann; I Büchner; A Hummel; M Dörr; T Reffelmann; A Riad; M C Busch; K Empen Journal: Herz Date: 2014-10-04 Impact factor: 1.443
Authors: E Kuon; K Weitmann; A Hummel; M Dörr; T Reffelmann; A Riad; M C Busch; S B Felix; W Hoffmann; K Empen Journal: Herz Date: 2013-12-08 Impact factor: 1.443
Authors: Maria Antonella Ruffino; Marco Fronda; Andrea Discalzi; Paola Isoardi; Laura Bergamasco; Roberto Ropolo; Dorico Righi; Paolo Fonio Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Kevin A Wunderle; Mina K Chung; Sripriya Rayadurgam; Mark A Miller; Nancy A Obuchowski; Bruce D Lindsay Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 1.900