Literature DB >> 22917459

Radiation dose reduction in the invasive cardiovascular laboratory: implementing a culture and philosophy of radiation safety.

Kenneth A Fetterly1, Verghese Mathew, Ryan Lennon, Malcolm R Bell, David R Holmes, Charanjit S Rihal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This paper investigates the effects of sustained practice and x-ray system technical changes on the radiation dose administered to adult patients during invasive cardiovascular procedures.
BACKGROUND: It is desirable to reduce radiation dose associated with medical imaging to minimize the risk of adverse radiation effects to both patients and staff. Several clinical practice and technical changes to elevate radiation awareness and reduce patient radiation dose were implemented under the guidance of a cardiovascular invasive labs radiation safety committee. Practice changes included: intraprocedure radiation dose announcements; reporting of procedures for which the air-kerma exceeded 6,000 mGy, including procedure air-kerma in the clinical report; and establishing compulsory radiation safety training for fellows. Technical changes included establishing standard x-ray imaging protocols, increased use of x-ray beam spectral filters, reducing the detector target dose for fluoroscopy and acquisition imaging, and reducing the fluoroscopy frame rate to 7.5 s(-1).
METHODS: Patient- and procedure-specific cumulative skin dose was calculated from air-kerma values and evaluated retrospectively over a period of 3 years. Data were categorized to include all procedures, percutaneous coronary interventions, coronary angiography, noncardiac vascular angiography and interventions, and interventions to treat structural heart disease. Statistical analysis was based on a comparison of the cumulative skin dose for procedures performed during the first and last quarters of the 3-year study period.
RESULTS: A total of 18,115 procedures were performed by 27 staff cardiologists and 65 fellows-in-training. Considering all procedures, the mean cumulative skin dose decreased from 969 to 568 mGy (40% reduction) over 3 years.
CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates that a philosophy of radiation safety, implemented through a collection of sustained practice and x-ray system changes, can result in a significant decrease in the radiation dose administered to patients during invasive cardiovascular procedures.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22917459     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  20 in total

Review 1.  Importance of establishing radiation protection culture in Radiology Department.

Authors:  Agapi Ploussi; Efstathios P Efstathopoulos
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-28

2.  Patient radiation exposure in a modern, large-volume, pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Andrew C Glatz; Akash Patel; Xiaowei Zhu; Yoav Dori; Brian D Hanna; Matthew J Gillespie; Jonathan J Rome
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 3.  Prevention of Contrast and Radiation Injury During Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Arash Ehteshami Afshar; Puja B Parikh
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-22

4.  Radiation Exposure During Transcatheter Valve Replacement: What Cardiac Surgeons Need to Know.

Authors:  Alejandro Aquino; Ali J Khiabani; Matthew C Henn; Alan Zajarias; Spencer J Melby; Marc Sintek; John Lasala; Puja Kachroo; Eric Novak; Hersh S Maniar
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Minimizing Medical Radiation Exposure by Incorporating a New Radiation "Vital Sign" into the Electronic Medical Record: Quality of Care and Patient Safety.

Authors:  Jonathan Lukoff; Jaime Olmos
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2017

6.  ECG-gated coronary angiography enables submillisievert imaging in invasive cardiology.

Authors:  E Kuon; S B Felix; K Weitmann; I Büchner; A Hummel; M Dörr; T Reffelmann; A Riad; M C Busch; K Empen
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 1.443

7.  Simulator training to minimize ionizing radiation exposure in the catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Aric Katz; Avraham Shtub; Amir Solomonica; Adva Poliakov; Ariel Roguin
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Latest-generation catheterization systems enable invasive submillisievert coronary angiography.

Authors:  E Kuon; K Weitmann; A Hummel; M Dörr; T Reffelmann; A Riad; M C Busch; S B Felix; W Hoffmann; K Empen
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 1.443

9.  Radiation dose during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR): upgrade of an angiographic system from standard to Eco mode.

Authors:  Maria Antonella Ruffino; Marco Fronda; Andrea Discalzi; Paola Isoardi; Laura Bergamasco; Roberto Ropolo; Dorico Righi; Paolo Fonio
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Occupational and patient radiation doses in a modern cardiac electrophysiology laboratory.

Authors:  Kevin A Wunderle; Mina K Chung; Sripriya Rayadurgam; Mark A Miller; Nancy A Obuchowski; Bruce D Lindsay
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.