Literature DB >> 25277222

ECG-gated coronary angiography enables submillisievert imaging in invasive cardiology.

E Kuon1, S B Felix, K Weitmann, I Büchner, A Hummel, M Dörr, T Reffelmann, A Riad, M C Busch, K Empen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The median dose area products (DAP) and effective doses (ED) of patients arising from coronary angiography (CA) are considerable: According the 2013 National German Registry, they amount to 19.8 Gy × cm(2) and 4.0 mSv, respectively.
METHODS: We investigated the feasibility of prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated coronary angiography (CA)-a novel technique in invasive cardiology-with respect to possible reduction in irradiation effects. Instead of universally fix-rated radiographic acquisition within 7.5-15 frames/s, one single frame/heartbeat was triggered toward the diastolic moment immediately before atrial contraction (77 % of ECG-RR interval) most likely to provide motion-free and hence optimized resolution of the coronary tree. For 200 patients (body mass index 27.8 kg/m(2), age 67.5 years, male 55 %, 68 bpm) undergoing ECG-gated CA, we measured various median (interquartile range) parameters for radiation exposure.
RESULTS: The total DAP was 0.64 (0.46-1.00), radiographic fraction was 0.30 (0.19-0.43), and fluoroscopic fraction was 0.35 (0.21-0.57) Gy × cm(2). Radiographic imaging occurred within 21.7 s (17.1-26.3), with 25 frames (20-30) over the course of 7 runs (6-8). Fluoroscopy time was 119 s (94-141). Radiographic DAP was 12.6 mGy × cm(2)/frame and 13.8 mGy × cm(2)/s. Fluoroscopic DAP was 0.8 mGy × cm(2)/pulse and 3.1 mGy × cm(2)/s. Patient reference point air kerma was 17.0 mGy (11.1-28.1) and contrast volume was 70 ml (60-85).
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, invasive ECG-gated coronary imaging is feasible in clinical routine and enables patient EDs of approx. 3 % of typical values in invasive cardiology: 0.13 mSv (0.09-0.20).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25277222     DOI: 10.1007/s00059-014-4153-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herz        ISSN: 0340-9937            Impact factor:   1.443


  28 in total

1.  Image quality and radiation exposure with prospectively ECG-triggered axial scanning for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, multivendor, randomized PROTECTION-III study.

Authors:  Jörg Hausleiter; Tanja S Meyer; Eugenio Martuscelli; Pietro Spagnolo; Hiroaki Yamamoto; Patricia Carrascosa; Thomas Anger; Lukas Lehmkuhl; Hatem Alkadhi; Stefan Martinoff; Martin Hadamitzky; Franziska Hein; Bernhard Bischoff; Miriam Kuse; Albert Schömig; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05

Review 2.  Occupational hazards of interventional cardiology.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Smilowitz; Stephen Balter; Giora Weisz
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2013-06-10

3.  Long-term efficacy of a mini-course in radiation-reducing techniques in invasive cardiology.

Authors:  E Kuon; K Empen; K Weitmann; A Staudt; A Hummel; M Dörr; T Reffelmann; W Hoffmann; S B Felix
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2013-05-21

4.  Radiation exposure in invasive cardiology.

Authors:  Eberhard Kuon
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Studies of mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 13: solid cancer and noncancer disease mortality: 1950-1997. 2003.

Authors:  Dale L Preston; Yukiko Shimizu; Donald A Pierce; Akihiko Suyama; Kiyohiko Mabuchi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Efficacy of a minicourse in radiation-reducing techniques in invasive cardiology: a multicenter field study.

Authors:  Eberhard Kuon; Kerstin Weitmann; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Marcus Dörr; Thorsten Reffelmann; Astrid Hummel; Alexander Riad; Mathias C Busch; Klaus Empen; Stephan B Felix
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 7.  Coronary computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Su M Chang; Sabha Bhatti; Faisal Nabi
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging among patients with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Patrick R Lawler; Jonathan Afilalo; Mark J Eisenberg; Louise Pilote
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Cancer risk related to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging in patients after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mark J Eisenberg; Jonathan Afilalo; Patrick R Lawler; Michal Abrahamowicz; Hugues Richard; Louise Pilote
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Comparison of rotational with conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  Klaus Empen; Eberhard Kuon; Astrid Hummel; Chris Gebauer; Marcus Dörr; Raik Könemann; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Alexander Staudt; Kerstin Weitmann; Thorsten Reffelmann; Stephan B Felix
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.