OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transradial versus transfemoral access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with a body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m(2). BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography is most commonly performed via femoral artery access; however, the optimal approach in extremely obese (EO) patients remains unclear. METHODS: Between January 2007 and August 2010, a cohort of consecutive EO patients who underwent coronary angiography was identified in our center's registry of angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention procedures. Of 21,103 procedures, 564 (2.7%) were performed in unique EO patients: 203 (36%) via the transradial approach; and 361 (64%) via the transfemoral approach. RESULTS: The primary outcome, a combined endpoint of major bleeding, access site complications, and nonaccess site complications, occurred in 7.5% of the transfemoral group and 2.0% of the transradial group (odds ratio [OR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10 to 0.88, p = 0.029), an endpoint driven by reductions in major bleeding (3.3% vs. 0.0%, OR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0 to 0.71, p = 0.015), as well as access site injuries (4.7% vs. 0.0%, OR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0 to 0.48, p = 0.002). There were no differences in nonaccess site complications (1.7% vs. 2.0%, OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 0.41 to 5.55), but transradial access procedures were associated with an increase in procedure time and patient radiation dose (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Transfemoral access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with more bleeding and access site complications when compared with a transradial approach. Important reductions in procedural associated morbidity may be possible with a transradial approach in EO patients.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transradial versus transfemoral access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with a body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m(2). BACKGROUND: Coronary angiography is most commonly performed via femoral artery access; however, the optimal approach in extremely obese (EO) patients remains unclear. METHODS: Between January 2007 and August 2010, a cohort of consecutive EO patients who underwent coronary angiography was identified in our center's registry of angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention procedures. Of 21,103 procedures, 564 (2.7%) were performed in unique EO patients: 203 (36%) via the transradial approach; and 361 (64%) via the transfemoral approach. RESULTS: The primary outcome, a combined endpoint of major bleeding, access site complications, and nonaccess site complications, occurred in 7.5% of the transfemoral group and 2.0% of the transradial group (odds ratio [OR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10 to 0.88, p = 0.029), an endpoint driven by reductions in major bleeding (3.3% vs. 0.0%, OR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0 to 0.71, p = 0.015), as well as access site injuries (4.7% vs. 0.0%, OR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0 to 0.48, p = 0.002). There were no differences in nonaccess site complications (1.7% vs. 2.0%, OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 0.41 to 5.55), but transradial access procedures were associated with an increase in procedure time and patient radiation dose (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Transfemoral access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with more bleeding and access site complications when compared with a transradial approach. Important reductions in procedural associated morbidity may be possible with a transradial approach in EO patients.
Authors: David T Harnett; Samir Hazra; Ronnen Maze; Brian A Mc Ardle; Ali Alenazy; Trevor Simard; Ellen Henry; Girish Dwivedi; Christopher Glover; Robert A deKemp; Ross A Davies; Terrence D Ruddy; Benjamin J W Chow; Rob S Beanlands; Benjamin Hibbert Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Vincent Cascio; Man Hon; Linda B Haramati; Animesh Gour; Peter Spiegler; Sanjeev Bhalla; Douglas S Katz Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Antonio Basile; Alberto Rebonato; Giovanni Failla; Giuseppe Caltabiano; Andrea Boncoraglio; Cecilia Gozzo; Alessandro Motta; Pietro Valerio Foti; Stefano Palmucci; Alfonso Juanjo García; Josè Garcia-Medina Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Tiffany M Powell-Wiley; Paul Poirier; Lora E Burke; Jean-Pierre Després; Penny Gordon-Larsen; Carl J Lavie; Scott A Lear; Chiadi E Ndumele; Ian J Neeland; Prashanthan Sanders; Marie-Pierre St-Onge Journal: Circulation Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Trevor Simard; Benjamin Hibbert; Madhu K Natarajan; Mathew Mercuri; Simon L Hetherington; Robert Wright; Ronak Delewi; Jan J Piek; Ralf Lehmann; Zoltán Ruzsa; Helmut W Lange; Håkan Geijer; Michael Sandborg; Vinay Kansal; Jordan Bernick; Pietro Di Santo; Ali Pourdjabbar; F Daniel Ramirez; Benjamin J W Chow; Aun Yeong Chong; Marino Labinaz; Michel R Le May; Edward R O'Brien; George A Wells; Derek So Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 5.501