Literature DB >> 31733737

The Value of Transradial: Impact on Patient Satisfaction and Health Care Economics.

Samuel M Lindner1, Christian A McNeely1, Amit P Amin2.   

Abstract

This review summarizes the impact of transradial access for cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention related to patient satisfaction, patient safety, and health care costs. In studies comparing transradial versus transfemoral approach, transradial access causes less bleeding and less vascular access site complications and provides a mortality benefit in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Transradial access improves patient satisfaction related to site tolerability by reducing pain and discomfort, and facilitating early ambulation with reduced length of stay. Taken in total, the existing randomized and observational data strongly support radial access for improved safety, patient satisfaction, and significant cost savings.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac catheterization; Transradial approach; Transradial versus femoral access

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31733737      PMCID: PMC7772820          DOI: 10.1016/j.iccl.2019.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Cardiol Clin        ISSN: 2211-7458


  44 in total

1.  Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians.

Authors:  Ronen Jaffe; Tony Hong; Waseem Sharieff; Robert J Chisholm; Michael J B Kutryk; Thierry Charron; Asim N Cheema
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Association between bleeding, blood transfusion, and costs among patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Sunil V Rao; Padma R Kaul; Lawrence Liao; Paul W Armstrong; E Magnus Ohman; Christopher B Granger; Robert M Califf; Robert A Harrington; Eric L Eisenstein; Daniel B Mark
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Costs Associated With Access Site and Same-Day Discharge Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Evaluation of the Current Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Care Pathways in the United States.

Authors:  Amit P Amin; Mark Patterson; John A House; Helmut Giersiefen; John A Spertus; Dmitri V Baklanov; Adnan K Chhatriwalla; David M Safley; David J Cohen; Sunil V Rao; Steven P Marso
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 11.195

4.  Comparison of quality-of-life measures after radial versus femoral artery access for cardiac catheterization in women: Results of the Study of Access Site for Enhancement of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Women quality-of-life substudy.

Authors:  Connie N Hess; Mitchell W Krucoff; Shubin Sheng; Kevin J Anstrom; W Britt Barham; Ian C Gilchrist; Robert A Harrington; Alice K Jacobs; Roxana Mehran; John C Messenger; Daniel B Mark; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Coronary arteriography by the Sones technique. Technical considerations.

Authors:  W H Sewell
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1965-11

6.  Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial.

Authors:  Sanjit S Jolly; Salim Yusuf; John Cairns; Kari Niemelä; Denis Xavier; Petr Widimsky; Andrzej Budaj; Matti Niemelä; Vicent Valentin; Basil S Lewis; Alvaro Avezum; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Sunil V Rao; Peggy Gao; Rizwan Afzal; Campbell D Joyner; Susan Chrolavicius; Shamir R Mehta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  An Update on Radial Artery Access and Best Practices for Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Peter J Mason; Binita Shah; Jacqueline E Tamis-Holland; John A Bittl; Mauricio G Cohen; Jordan Safirstein; Douglas E Drachman; Javier A Valle; Denise Rhodes; Ian C Gilchrist
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.546

8.  Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Sunil V Rao; Fang-Shu Ou; Tracy Y Wang; Matthew T Roe; Ralph Brindis; John S Rumsfeld; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 11.195

9.  Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United kingdom.

Authors:  Karim Ratib; Mamas A Mamas; Simon G Anderson; Gurbir Bhatia; Helen Routledge; Mark De Belder; Peter F Ludman; Douglas Fraser; James Nolan
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 10.  Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ahmed A Kolkailah; Rabah S Alreshq; Ahmed M Muhammed; Mohamed E Zahran; Marwah Anas El-Wegoud; Ashraf F Nabhan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-18
View more
  2 in total

1.  Cost analysis of a coaching intervention to increase use of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Kevin I Duan; Christian D Helfrich; Sunil V Rao; Emily L Neely; Christine A Sulc; Diana Naranjo; Edwin S Wong
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-10-27

2.  Evaluation of the Distal Radial Approach in percutaneous coronary interventions. Controlled, randomized non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Ahmed Ben Amara; Aymen Noamen; Yassine Anouar; Sarra Chenik; Nadhem Hajlaoui; Wafa Fehri
Journal:  Tunis Med       Date:  2022 mars
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.