OBJECTIVE: Endovascular coiling is often performed by first placing coils along the aneurysm wall to create a frame and then by filling up the aneurysm core. However, little attention has been paid to quantifying this filling strategy and to see how it changes for different packing densities. The purpose of this work is to analyze and quantify endovascular coil distribution inside aneurysms based on serial histological images of experimental aneurysms. METHOD: Seventeen histological images from 10 elastase-induced saccular aneurysms in rabbits treated with coils were studied. In-slice coil density, defined as the area taken up by coil winds, was calculated on each histological image. Images were analyzed by partitioning the aneurysm along its longitudinal and radial axes. Coil distribution was quantified by measuring and comparing the in-slice coil density of each partition. RESULTS: Mean total in-slice coil density was 22.0 ± 6.2% (range 10.1-30.2%). The density was non-significantly different (p = 0.465) along the longitudinal axis. A significant difference (p < 0.001) between peripheral and core densities was found. Additionally, the peripheral-core density ratio was observed to be inversely proportional to the total in-slice coil density (R(2)=0.57, p <0.001). This ratio was near unity for high in-slice coil density (around 30%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate and confirm that coils tend to be located near the aneurysm periphery when few are inserted. However, when more coils are added, the radial distribution becomes more homogeneous. Coils are homogeneously distributed along the longitudinal axis.
OBJECTIVE: Endovascular coiling is often performed by first placing coils along the aneurysm wall to create a frame and then by filling up the aneurysm core. However, little attention has been paid to quantifying this filling strategy and to see how it changes for different packing densities. The purpose of this work is to analyze and quantify endovascular coil distribution inside aneurysms based on serial histological images of experimental aneurysms. METHOD: Seventeen histological images from 10 elastase-induced saccular aneurysms in rabbits treated with coils were studied. In-slice coil density, defined as the area taken up by coil winds, was calculated on each histological image. Images were analyzed by partitioning the aneurysm along its longitudinal and radial axes. Coil distribution was quantified by measuring and comparing the in-slice coil density of each partition. RESULTS: Mean total in-slice coil density was 22.0 ± 6.2% (range 10.1-30.2%). The density was non-significantly different (p = 0.465) along the longitudinal axis. A significant difference (p < 0.001) between peripheral and core densities was found. Additionally, the peripheral-core density ratio was observed to be inversely proportional to the total in-slice coil density (R(2)=0.57, p <0.001). This ratio was near unity for high in-slice coil density (around 30%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate and confirm that coils tend to be located near the aneurysm periphery when few are inserted. However, when more coils are added, the radial distribution becomes more homogeneous. Coils are homogeneously distributed along the longitudinal axis.
Authors: Z Zeng; D F Kallmes; M J Durka; Y Ding; D Lewis; R Kadirvel; A M Robertson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-01-27 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Manik Mehra; Michael C Hurley; Matthew J Gounis; Robert M King; Ali Shaibani; Guilherme Dabus; Fatimaezzahra E Labdag; Elad I Levy; Bernard R Bendok Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2011-01-24 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Menno Sluzewski; Willem Jan van Rooij; Marian J Slob; Javier Oliván Bescós; Cornelis H Slump; Douwe Wijnalda Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Hans Henkes; Sebastian Fischer; Werner Weber; Elina Miloslavski; Stephan Felber; Stefan Brew; Dietmar Kuehne Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Chander Sadasivan; Jeremy Brownstein; Bhumika Patel; Ronak Dholakia; Joseph Santore; Fawaz Al-Mufti; Enrique Puig; Audrey Rakian; Kenneth D Fernandez-Prada; Mohamed S Elhammady; Hamad Farhat; David J Fiorella; Henry H Woo; Mohammad A Aziz-Sultan; Baruch B Lieber Journal: Cardiovasc Eng Technol Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 2.495
Authors: Robert J Damiano; Vincent M Tutino; Saeb R Lamooki; Nikhil Paliwal; Gary F Dargush; Jason M Davies; Adnan H Siddiqui; Hui Meng Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-12-27 Impact factor: 3.240