Literature DB >> 21990804

The impact of coil shape design on angiographic occlusion, packing density and coil mass uniformity in aneurysm embolization: an in vitro study.

Manik Mehra1, Michael C Hurley, Matthew J Gounis, Robert M King, Ali Shaibani, Guilherme Dabus, Fatimaezzahra E Labdag, Elad I Levy, Bernard R Bendok.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of coil design on the distribution of the coil mass in a controlled in vitro experiment. A secondary objective was to study the relationship between angiographic occlusion, packing density and coil mass uniformity.
METHODS: Seven silicon side wall aneurysm models were embolized in each arm with a different coil design under fluoroscopic guidance. Packing density calculations and scoring of the angiographic occlusion were made. The models were embedded in epoxy and sectioned through the aneurysm neck and the dome. The sections were imaged and processed to derive the fractional surface area of coil material over the coil free area, a quantitative endpoint representing the percentage of the given region of interest consumed by coils. The SD of the surface area fractions is inversely proportional to the uniformity of coil distribution.
RESULTS: The novel triangular primary wind design of the Deltapaq achieved a more homogenous distribution of coils within the aneurysm dome compared with the helical and complex microcoil systems (p=0.018). The packing density achieved by the Deltapaq (39.1±1.6%) was significantly higher than the complex (35.2±2.8%) and the helical (32.2±3.3%) coils. Angiographically, aneurysms coiled by the Deltapaq were more likely to obtain a Raymond score of class I.
CONCLUSION: Evaluation of emerging coil technologies with respect to treatment durability may be well served by an assessment of their uniformity of distribution within an aneurysm in addition of the traditional packing density and angiographic occlusion scoring methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21990804     DOI: 10.1136/jnis.2010.004390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of the characteristics of various types of finishing coils for the embolization of intracranial aneurysms in an experimental model with radiolucent coils.

Authors:  Keisuke Ota; Noriaki Matsubara; Shigeru Miyachi; Takashi Izumi; Masashi Ito; Takumi Asai; Takashi Yamanouchi; Toshihiko Wakabayashi
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 2.  Silicone models as basic training and research aid in endovascular neurointervention--a single-center experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Srinivasan Paramasivam; Gerasimos Baltsavias; Evlampia Psatha; Georgios Matis; Anton Valavanis
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Effects of anatomic characteristics of aneurysms on packing density in endovascular coil embolization: analysis of a single center's experience.

Authors:  Akiyo Sadato; Kazuhide Adachi; Motoharu Hayakawa; Yoko Kato; Yuichi Hirose
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  IN VITRO QUANTIFICATION OF THE SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF INTRASACCULAR VOIDS LEFT AFTER ENDOVASCULAR COILING OF CEREBRAL ANEURYSMS.

Authors:  Chander Sadasivan; Jeremy Brownstein; Bhumika Patel; Ronak Dholakia; Joseph Santore; Fawaz Al-Mufti; Enrique Puig; Audrey Rakian; Kenneth D Fernandez-Prada; Mohamed S Elhammady; Hamad Farhat; David J Fiorella; Henry H Woo; Mohammad A Aziz-Sultan; Baruch B Lieber
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.495

5.  Analysis and quantification of endovascular coil distribution inside saccular aneurysms using histological images.

Authors:  Hernán G Morales; Ignacio Larrabide; Arjan J Geers; Daying Dai; David F Kallmes; Alejandro F Frangi
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 5.836

6.  Large Residual Volume, Not Low Packing Density, Is the Most Influential Risk Factor for Recanalization after Coil Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms.

Authors:  Akiyo Sadato; Motoharu Hayakawa; Kazuhide Adachi; Ichiro Nakahara; Yuichi Hirose
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Hydrogel Endovascular Aneurysm Treatment Trial (HEAT): A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Second-Generation Hydrogel Coil.

Authors:  Bernard R Bendok; Karl R Abi-Aad; Jennifer D Ward; Jason F Kniss; Mary J Kwasny; Rudy J Rahme; Salah G Aoun; Tarek Y El Ahmadieh; Najib E El Tecle; Samer G Zammar; Rami James N Aoun; Devi P Patra; Sameer A Ansari; Jean Raymond; Henry H Woo; David Fiorella; Guilherme Dabus; Genevieve Milot; Josser E Delgado Almandoz; John A Scott; Andrew J DeNardo; Shervin R Dashti
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Aneurysm permeability following coil embolization: packing density and coil distribution.

Authors:  Ju-Yu Chueh; Srinivasan Vedantham; Ajay K Wakhloo; Sarena L Carniato; Ajit S Puri; Conrad Bzura; Spencer Coffin; Alexei A Bogdanov; Matthew J Gounis
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.836

9.  Relationship between the Volume Rate of Ed Coil (Ed Ratio) and Packing Density in Endosaccular Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms.

Authors:  Akiyo Sadato; Motoharu Hayakawa; Kazuhide Adachi; Yuichi Hirose
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.