Literature DB >> 22914611

Correlation between HER2 determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of the oncotype DX test.

Leah Dvorak1, Michelle Dolan, James Fink, Linda Varghese, Jonathan Henriksen, H Evin Gulbahce.   

Abstract

The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene is amplified and its protein product overexpressed in about 20% of invasive breast cancers. Despite more than a decade of efforts to standardize HER2 testing, controversy persists regarding the most optimal testing method. Recently, Oncotype DX reports have begun including HER2 results in addition to the previously reported Recurrence Score. We compared HER2 results obtained by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in our laboratories with HER2 results obtained by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) as documented in the Oncotype DX report. We then sought to identify potentially significant characteristics in the discrepant cases. We identified breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor-positive, lymph node-negative tumors who had Oncotype DX testing performed between September 2008 and March 2012. Patient and tumor characteristics including HER2 FISH and Oncotype DX test results were recorded. Image analysis was performed on cases with discrepancy between the HER2 FISH and Oncotype DX HER2 results to determine the relative proportion of invasive tumor. Eight of 194 (4.1%) cases showed discrepancy between HER2 FISH and Oncotype DX RT-PCR results. Although the overall percent agreement (96%) and percent negative agreement (100%) were high, percent positive agreement was only 50%. Three of 8 (38%) discrepant cases showed heterogeneous amplification by FISH. Seven of 8 (88%) discrepant cases had <50% invasive tumor in the Oncotype DX tissue block. Percent positive agreement between HER2 FISH and Oncotype DX RT-PCR is low. Multiple factors may contribute to this discrepancy including a suboptimal microdissection and possibly heterogeneous amplification of HER2 gene in some cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22914611     DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0b013e3182632ff5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol        ISSN: 1533-4058


  8 in total

1.  Impact of the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 revised guidelines on HER2 results in breast core biopsies with invasive breast carcinoma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Wynton B Overcast; Jianying Zhang; Debra L Zynger; Gary H Tozbikian
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  HER2 testing in breast cancers: comparison of assays and interpretation using ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guidelines.

Authors:  Lauren E McLemore; Constance T Albarracin; Stephen K Gruschkus; Roland L Bassett; Yun Wu; Sagar Dhamne; Isaiah Yim; Kevin Lin; Isabelle Bedrosian; Nour Sneige; Hui Chen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Clinical utility of gene-expression profiling in women with early breast cancer: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Michael Marrone; Alison Stewart; W David Dotson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  The relationship between quantitative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene expression by the 21-gene reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay and adjuvant trastuzumab benefit in Alliance N9831.

Authors:  Edith A Perez; Frederick L Baehner; Steven M Butler; E Aubrey Thompson; Amylou C Dueck; Farid Jamshidian; Diana Cherbavaz; Carl Yoshizawa; Steven Shak; Peter A Kaufman; Nancy E Davidson; Julie Gralow; Yan W Asmann; Karla V Ballman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 5.  Hormonal Modulation of Breast Cancer Gene Expression: Implications for Intrinsic Subtyping in Premenopausal Women.

Authors:  Sarah M Bernhardt; Pallave Dasari; David Walsh; Amanda R Townsend; Timothy J Price; Wendy V Ingman
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Concordance of the 21-gene assay between core needle biopsy and resection specimens in early breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Peng Qi; Yu Yang; Qian-Ming Bai; Tian Xue; Min Ren; Qian-Lan Yao; Wen-Tao Yang; Xiao-Yan Zhou
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Molecular characterization and clinical impact of TMPRSS2-ERG rearrangement on prostate cancer: comparison between FISH and RT-PCR.

Authors:  A Fernández-Serra; L Rubio; A Calatrava; J Rubio-Briones; R Salgado; R Gil-Benso; B Espinet; Z García-Casado; J A López-Guerrero
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  In situ quantitative measurement of HER2mRNA predicts benefit from trastuzumab-containing chemotherapy in a cohort of metastatic breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Maria Vassilakopoulou; Taiwo Togun; Urania Dafni; Huan Cheng; Jennifer Bordeaux; Veronique M Neumeister; Mattheos Bobos; George Pentheroudakis; Dimosthenis V Skarlos; Dimitrios Pectasides; Vassiliki Kotoula; George Fountzilas; David L Rimm; Amanda Psyrri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.