Michael Marrone1, Alison Stewart1, W David Dotson2. 1. 1] McKing Consulting Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA [2] Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 2. Office of Public Health Genomics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This overview systematically evaluates the clinical utility of using Oncotype DX and MammaPrint gene-expression profiling tests to direct treatment decisions in women with breast cancer. The findings are intended to inform an updated recommendation from the Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention Working Group. METHODS: Evidence reported in systematic reviews evaluating the clinical utility of Oncotype DX and MammaPrint, as well as the ability to predict treatment outcomes, change in treatment decisions, and cost-effectiveness, was qualitatively synthesized. RESULTS: Five systematic reviews found no direct evidence of clinical utility for either test. Indirect evidence showed Oncotype DX was able to predict treatment effects of adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas no evidence of predictive value was found for MammaPrint. Both tests influenced a change in treatment recommendations in 21 to 74% of participants. The cost-effectiveness of Oncotype DX varied with the alternative compared. For MammaPrint, lack of evidence of the predictive value led to uncertainty in the cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: No studies were identified that provided direct evidence that using gene-expression profiling tests to direct treatment decisions improved outcomes in women with breast cancer. Three ongoing studies may provide direct evidence for determining the clinical utility of gene-expression profiling testing.
PURPOSE: This overview systematically evaluates the clinical utility of using Oncotype DX and MammaPrint gene-expression profiling tests to direct treatment decisions in women with breast cancer. The findings are intended to inform an updated recommendation from the Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention Working Group. METHODS: Evidence reported in systematic reviews evaluating the clinical utility of Oncotype DX and MammaPrint, as well as the ability to predict treatment outcomes, change in treatment decisions, and cost-effectiveness, was qualitatively synthesized. RESULTS: Five systematic reviews found no direct evidence of clinical utility for either test. Indirect evidence showed Oncotype DX was able to predict treatment effects of adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas no evidence of predictive value was found for MammaPrint. Both tests influenced a change in treatment recommendations in 21 to 74% of participants. The cost-effectiveness of Oncotype DX varied with the alternative compared. For MammaPrint, lack of evidence of the predictive value led to uncertainty in the cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: No studies were identified that provided direct evidence that using gene-expression profiling tests to direct treatment decisions improved outcomes in women with breast cancer. Three ongoing studies may provide direct evidence for determining the clinical utility of gene-expression profiling testing.
Authors: Valesca P Retèl; Manuela A Joore; Michael Knauer; Sabine C Linn; Michael Hauptmann; Wim H van Harten Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Nina Oestreicher; Scott D Ramsey; Hannah M Linden; Jeannine S McCune; Laura J van't Veer; Wylie Burke; David L Veenstra Journal: Genet Med Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Gong Tang; Steven Shak; Soonmyung Paik; Stewart J Anderson; Joseph P Costantino; Charles E Geyer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Foluso O Ademuyiwa; Austin Miller; Tracey O'Connor; Stephen B Edge; Mangesh A Thorat; George W Sledge; Ellis Levine; Sunil Badve Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-01-01 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Scott D Ramsey; William E Barlow; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Sean Tunis; Laurence Baker; John Crowley; Patricia Deverka; David Veenstra; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-09-18 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Leah Dvorak; Michelle Dolan; James Fink; Linda Varghese; Jonathan Henriksen; H Evin Gulbahce Journal: Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol Date: 2013-05
Authors: Keith I Block; Charlotte Gyllenhaal; Leroy Lowe; Amedeo Amedei; A R M Ruhul Amin; Amr Amin; Katia Aquilano; Jack Arbiser; Alexandra Arreola; Alla Arzumanyan; S Salman Ashraf; Asfar S Azmi; Fabian Benencia; Dipita Bhakta; Alan Bilsland; Anupam Bishayee; Stacy W Blain; Penny B Block; Chandra S Boosani; Thomas E Carey; Amancio Carnero; Marianeve Carotenuto; Stephanie C Casey; Mrinmay Chakrabarti; Rupesh Chaturvedi; Georgia Zhuo Chen; Helen Chen; Sophie Chen; Yi Charlie Chen; Beom K Choi; Maria Rosa Ciriolo; Helen M Coley; Andrew R Collins; Marisa Connell; Sarah Crawford; Colleen S Curran; Charlotta Dabrosin; Giovanna Damia; Santanu Dasgupta; Ralph J DeBerardinis; William K Decker; Punita Dhawan; Anna Mae E Diehl; Jin-Tang Dong; Q Ping Dou; Janice E Drew; Eyad Elkord; Bassel El-Rayes; Mark A Feitelson; Dean W Felsher; Lynnette R Ferguson; Carmela Fimognari; Gary L Firestone; Christian Frezza; Hiromasa Fujii; Mark M Fuster; Daniele Generali; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Frank Gieseler; Michael Gilbertson; Michelle F Green; Brendan Grue; Gunjan Guha; Dorota Halicka; William G Helferich; Petr Heneberg; Patricia Hentosh; Matthew D Hirschey; Lorne J Hofseth; Randall F Holcombe; Kanya Honoki; Hsue-Yin Hsu; Gloria S Huang; Lasse D Jensen; Wen G Jiang; Lee W Jones; Phillip A Karpowicz; W Nicol Keith; Sid P Kerkar; Gazala N Khan; Mahin Khatami; Young H Ko; Omer Kucuk; Rob J Kulathinal; Nagi B Kumar; Byoung S Kwon; Anne Le; Michael A Lea; Ho-Young Lee; Terry Lichtor; Liang-Tzung Lin; Jason W Locasale; Bal L Lokeshwar; Valter D Longo; Costas A Lyssiotis; Karen L MacKenzie; Meenakshi Malhotra; Maria Marino; Maria L Martinez-Chantar; Ander Matheu; Christopher Maxwell; Eoin McDonnell; Alan K Meeker; Mahya Mehrmohamadi; Kapil Mehta; Gregory A Michelotti; Ramzi M Mohammad; Sulma I Mohammed; D James Morre; Vinayak Muralidhar; Irfana Muqbil; Michael P Murphy; Ganji Purnachandra Nagaraju; Rita Nahta; Elena Niccolai; Somaira Nowsheen; Carolina Panis; Francesco Pantano; Virginia R Parslow; Graham Pawelec; Peter L Pedersen; Brad Poore; Deepak Poudyal; Satya Prakash; Mark Prince; Lizzia Raffaghello; Jeffrey C Rathmell; W Kimryn Rathmell; Swapan K Ray; Jörg Reichrath; Sarallah Rezazadeh; Domenico Ribatti; Luigi Ricciardiello; R Brooks Robey; Francis Rodier; H P Vasantha Rupasinghe; Gian Luigi Russo; Elizabeth P Ryan; Abbas K Samadi; Isidro Sanchez-Garcia; Andrew J Sanders; Daniele Santini; Malancha Sarkar; Tetsuro Sasada; Neeraj K Saxena; Rodney E Shackelford; H M C Shantha Kumara; Dipali Sharma; Dong M Shin; David Sidransky; Markus David Siegelin; Emanuela Signori; Neetu Singh; Sharanya Sivanand; Daniel Sliva; Carl Smythe; Carmela Spagnuolo; Diana M Stafforini; John Stagg; Pochi R Subbarayan; Tabetha Sundin; Wamidh H Talib; Sarah K Thompson; Phuoc T Tran; Hendrik Ungefroren; Matthew G Vander Heiden; Vasundara Venkateswaran; Dass S Vinay; Panagiotis J Vlachostergios; Zongwei Wang; Kathryn E Wellen; Richard L Whelan; Eddy S Yang; Huanjie Yang; Xujuan Yang; Paul Yaswen; Clement Yedjou; Xin Yin; Jiyue Zhu; Massimo Zollo Journal: Semin Cancer Biol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 15.707
Authors: Bradley M Turner; Mary Ann Gimenez-Sanders; Armen Soukiazian; Andrea C Breaux; Kristin Skinner; Michelle Shayne; Nyrie Soukiazian; Marilyn Ling; David G Hicks Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 4.452