| Literature DB >> 22913315 |
Yang Yang1, Chunli Zhang, Li Li, Yusong Gao, Xinming Luo, Yadong Zhang, Weiping Liu, Zhou Fei.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The significance of p28GANK in gliomas remains unknown. This study aims to clarify the clinical significance of p28GANK in human gliomas.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22913315 PMCID: PMC3442972 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-169
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Figure 1Immunohistochemical staining of glioma and para-cancerous tissues (A) and Kaplan-Meier analysis of the p28GANK expression associated with the survival time of patients after surgery(B). (A) Staining of p28GANK was observed mainly in the nucleus of glioma cells. a Negative staining (−) of p28GANK in para-cancerous tissues. b Absent staining (−) of p28GANK in glioma cells. c, d Positive staining (+) of p28GANK in grade II glioma cells. e, f Positive staining (+) of p28GANK in grade III glioma cells. g, h Positive staining (+) p28GANK in grade IV glioma cells. Original magnifications: a-c, e and g × 200; d, f, h × 400. (B) Survival rates of total (i), gradeI + II (j) and grade III + IV (k) patients according to the expression of p28GANK.
Association of p28GANK expression with the clinical parameters
| Gender | | | | |
| Female | 79 | 21 | 58 | 0.18 |
| Male | 59 | 22 | 37 | |
| Age, years | | | | |
| < 42 | 69 | 20 | 49 | 0.58 |
| > 42 | 69 | 23 | 46 | |
| KPS, score | | | | |
| < 70 | 69 | 38 | 31 | < 0.001 |
| > 70 | 69 | 5 | 64 | |
| Grade | | | | |
| I + II | 56 | 25 | 31 | 0.005 |
| III + IV | 82 | 18 | 64 | |
aKruskal–Wallis H-test. KPS, Karnofsky performance status.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of different prognostic factors correlated with patient survival
| Age, years | | 0.55 | 1.12 | 0.82, 1.97 | 0.29 |
| < 42 | 34 (3.1) | | | | |
| > 42 | 38 (6.8) | | | | |
| Gender | | 0.39 | 0.08 | 0.61, 1.45 | 0.78 |
| Men | 37.2 (2.3) | | | | |
| Women | 40.2 (2.5) | | | | |
| KPS, score | | < 0.001 | 8.86 | 1.29, 3.49 | 0.003 |
| < 70 | — | | | | |
| > 70 | 21 (2.1) | | | | |
| Grade | | 0.001 | 3.43 | 0.97, 2.61 | 0.06 |
| I + II | — | | | | |
| III + IV | 29 (3.1) | | | | |
| p28GANK | | < 0.001 | 8.61 | 1.37, 4.83 | 0.003 |
| Negative | — | | | | |
| Postivie | 28 (1.58) | ||||
MST: median survival time. aLog-rank test. bCox regression model.
Figure 2Inhibition of p28GANK expression represses the proliferation of U251 cell and (A) The expression of p28GANK in Si-U251 cells was markedly lower compared with the controls (Con-251 and U251) on Western blot analysis. (B): Growth curves of U251, Con-U251 and Si-U251 cells by MTT assays. The results presented were the mean of three replicates. (C) Comparison of glioma cell tumorigenicity in mice. The left flank was injected with Si-U251 cells, and the right flank was injected with Con-U251 cells. (D) Tumor volumes formed by si-U251 were significantly smaller than Con-U251 cells. P < 0.05.