OBJECTIVES: 53BP1, a critical mediator of the DNA damage response, functions by regulating the balance between homologous recombination (HR) and the more error-prone non-homologous endjoining (NHEJ). Deletion of 53BP1 in brca1 (but not brca2) null cells partially restores HR and reverses sensitivity to poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). We characterized 53BP1 and BRCA1 expression and their association with clinical outcomes in sporadic and inherited ovarian carcinomas. METHODS: We evaluated 53BP1 and BRCA1 protein expression using immunohistochemistry in 248 ovarian carcinomas and mRNA expression in 89 cases with quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. All subjects were comprehensively characterized for germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. RESULTS: BRCA1-mutated (but not BRCA2-mutated) ovarian carcinomas had significantly higher 53BP1 protein expression than wildtype carcinomas. 53BP1 message levels were significantly associated with BRCA1 message levels in wildtype and BRCA1-mutated but not BRCA2-mutated carcinomas. In wildtype carcinomas, lower 53BP1 message predicted improved survival (p=0.02, median survival 74 vs. 41months, HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.88). Survival was not impacted by BRCA1 message level. 53BP1 expression was not associated with primary platinum resistance. In 54 paired primary and recurrent cases, 53BP1 protein expression was equally likely to decrease or increase, and there was no association between decreased 53BP1 at recurrence and the development of platinum resistance. CONCLUSIONS: BRCA1-mutated ovarian carcinomas have higher 53BP1 protein expression than wildtype or BRCA2-mutated carcinomas, in opposition to previous findings in breast carcinomas. Higher 53BP1 protein, which promotes NHEJ, could explain the frequent chromosomal aberrations that are characteristic of BRCA1-mutated ovarian carcinomas. In wildtype ovarian carcinomas, decreased 53BP1 message predicts improved survival, but message and protein expression were not associated.
OBJECTIVES:53BP1, a critical mediator of the DNA damage response, functions by regulating the balance between homologous recombination (HR) and the more error-prone non-homologous endjoining (NHEJ). Deletion of 53BP1 in brca1 (but not brca2) null cells partially restores HR and reverses sensitivity to poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). We characterized 53BP1 and BRCA1 expression and their association with clinical outcomes in sporadic and inherited ovarian carcinomas. METHODS: We evaluated 53BP1 and BRCA1 protein expression using immunohistochemistry in 248 ovarian carcinomas and mRNA expression in 89 cases with quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. All subjects were comprehensively characterized for germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. RESULTS:BRCA1-mutated (but not BRCA2-mutated) ovarian carcinomas had significantly higher 53BP1 protein expression than wildtype carcinomas. 53BP1 message levels were significantly associated with BRCA1 message levels in wildtype and BRCA1-mutated but not BRCA2-mutated carcinomas. In wildtype carcinomas, lower 53BP1 message predicted improved survival (p=0.02, median survival 74 vs. 41months, HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.88). Survival was not impacted by BRCA1 message level. 53BP1 expression was not associated with primary platinum resistance. In 54 paired primary and recurrent cases, 53BP1 protein expression was equally likely to decrease or increase, and there was no association between decreased 53BP1 at recurrence and the development of platinum resistance. CONCLUSIONS:BRCA1-mutated ovarian carcinomas have higher 53BP1 protein expression than wildtype or BRCA2-mutated carcinomas, in opposition to previous findings in breast carcinomas. Higher 53BP1 protein, which promotes NHEJ, could explain the frequent chromosomal aberrations that are characteristic of BRCA1-mutated ovarian carcinomas. In wildtype ovarian carcinomas, decreased 53BP1 message predicts improved survival, but message and protein expression were not associated.
Authors: Jens M Teodoridis; Jacqueline Hall; Sharon Marsh; Hilary D Kannall; Catriona Smyth; Jorge Curto; Nadeem Siddiqui; Hani Gabra; Howard L McLeod; Gordon Strathdee; Robert Brown Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: C A Wilson; L Ramos; M R Villaseñor; K H Anders; M F Press; K Clarke; B Karlan; J J Chen; R Scully; D Livingston; R H Zuch; M H Kanter; S Cohen; F J Calzone; D J Slamon Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Toshiyasu Taniguchi; Marc Tischkowitz; Najim Ameziane; Shirley V Hodgson; Christopher G Mathew; Hans Joenje; Samuel C Mok; Alan D D'Andrea Journal: Nat Med Date: 2003-04-07 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: M Thrall; H H Gallion; R Kryscio; M Kapali; D K Armstrong; Julie A DeLoia Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Hannah Farmer; Nuala McCabe; Christopher J Lord; Andrew N J Tutt; Damian A Johnson; Tobias B Richardson; Manuela Santarosa; Krystyna J Dillon; Ian Hickson; Charlotte Knights; Niall M B Martin; Stephen P Jackson; Graeme C M Smith; Alan Ashworth Journal: Nature Date: 2005-04-14 Impact factor: 69.504
Authors: Irene M Ward; Bernardo Reina-San-Martin; Alexandru Olaru; Kay Minn; Koji Tamada; Julie S Lau; Marilia Cascalho; Lieping Chen; Andre Nussenzweig; Ferenc Livak; Michel C Nussenzweig; Junjie Chen Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2004-05-24 Impact factor: 10.539