| Literature DB >> 22909172 |
Mireia Olivan1, Jochen Springer, Sílvia Busquets, Anika Tschirner, Maite Figueras, Miriam Toledo, Cibely Fontes-Oliveira, Maria Inés Genovese, Paula Ventura da Silva, Angelica Sette, Francisco J López-Soriano, Stefan Anker, Josep M Argilés.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of the present investigation was to examine the anti-wasting effects of theophylline (a methylxantine present in tea leaves) on a rat model of cancer cachexia.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22909172 PMCID: PMC3495887 DOI: 10.1186/1743-7075-9-76
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Figure 1Effect of theophylline on the proteolytic rate of C2C12 cells under hyperthermia. Values for protein degradation are presented as the percentage of the respective control value at 37°C of the amino acid radioactivity in the medium versus the total radioactivity incorporated into protein (for further details, see the Material and Methods section). All data are means ± SEM. The number inside the bars represents the concentration of theophylline (mM). Values that are significantly different by one-way ANOVA (post-test Duncan), from the control (non treated) group are indicated by: # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01. Values that are significantly different by one-way ANOVA (post-test Duncan) from hyperthermia are indicated by: *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2Effect of theophylline (50 mg/kg bw) on body weight change, food intake and tumour content in rats bearing the Yoshida AH-130 ascites hepatoma. Results are mean ± SEM. Body weight change is expressed as the difference between final body weight and initial body weight (IBW). Food intake is expressed in g/100 g IBW and refers to the food ingested during the period of the experiment prior to sacrifice, which took place 7 days after tumour inoculation. Tumour cell content is expressed in millions of cells. C = non-tumour-bearing rats, T = tumour-bearing rats, T + TPH = tumour-bearing rats treated with theophylline. Values that are significantly different by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) are indicated by: ### p < 0.001 (tumour effect).
Figure 3Effect of theophylline (50 mg/kg bw) on soleus and heart weights in rats bearing the Yoshida AH-130 ascites hepatoma. Results are mean ± SEM. Muscles weights are expressed as mg/100 g of initial body weight (IBW). C = non-tumour-bearing rats, T = tumour-bearing rats, T + TPH = tumour-bearing rats treated with theophylline. Values that are significantly different by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) are indicated by: # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 (tumour effect); * p < 0.05 (treatment effect).
Effects of theophylline (50 mg/kg bw) on body composition in rats bearing the Yoshida AH-130 ascites hepatoma
| | | | | | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | |||||
| 3.2 ± 1.1 | −4.3 ± 0.5 | −2.3 ± 0.7 | 0,000 | 0,045 | |
| 23.5 ± 1.5 | 1.7 ± 1.7 | 7 ± 3 | 0,000 | ns | |
| 0.03 ± 0.2 | −0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.04 ± 0.3 | 0,034 | 0,025 | |
Results are expressed as the difference between day 0 (tumour inoculation) and day 7; mean ± SEM. C = non-tumour-bearing rats, T = tumour-bearing rats, T + TPH = tumour-bearing rats treated with theophylline. Statistical significance of the results by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); ns: non-significant differences. A (tumour effect); B (treatment effect).
Effects of theophylline (50 mg/kg bw) on soleus muscle and heart mRNA content of the different proteolytic systems in rats bearing the Yoshida AH-130 ascites hepatoma
| | | | | | | | | | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ubiquitin | 100 ± 6 | 204 ± 15 | 118 ± 18 | 0,000 | 0,001 | 100 ± 5 | 302 ± 51 | 177 ± 32 | 0,001 | 0,019 |
| Proteasome subunit C2 | 100 ± 13 | 168 ± 10 | 160 ± 40 | ns | ns | 100 ± 3 | 303 ± 47 | 191 ± 23 | 0,000 | 0,010 |
| Proteasome subunit C8 | 100 ± 5 | 111 ± 8 | 97 ± 25 | ns | ns | 100 ± 3 | 262 ± 26 | 164 ± 22 | 0,000 | 0,005 |
| E2 | 100 ± 5 | 527 ± 129 | 288 ± 80 | 0,004 | 0,063 | 100 ± 5 | 224 ± 55 | 114 ± 19 | 0,013 | 0,025 |
| MuRF-1 | 100 ± 3 | 171 ± 19 | 80 ± 26 | 0,025 | 0,007 | 100 ± 3 | 309 ± 92 | 177 ± 38 | 0,015 | ns |
| Atrogin-1 | 100 ± 8 | 392 ± 22 | 362 ± 71 | 0,002 | ns | 100 ± 3 | 161 ± 21 | 152 ± 21 | 0,039 | ns |
| m-calpain | 100 ± 4 | 117 ± 23 | 142 ± 43 | ns | ns | 100 ± 4 | 307 ± 58 | 170 ± 18 | 0,001 | 0,009 |
| Cathepsin-B | 100 ± 4 | 111 ± 8 | 151 ± 34 | ns | ns | 100 ± 2 | 194 ± 40 | 111 ± 13 | 0,010 | ns |
For further details, see the Material and Methods section. The results are expressed as a percentage of controls (T). All data are mean ± SEM. C = non-tumour-bearing rats, T = tumour-bearing rats, T + TPH = tumour-bearing rats treated with theophylline. Statistical significance of the results by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) are indicated by: ns (non-significant differences), A (tumour effect), B (treatment effect).
Figure 4Effect of theophylline (50 mg/kg bw) on circulating TNF-α and IL-10 concentrations in rats bearing the Yoshida AH-130 ascites hepatoma. Results are mean ± SEM. The plasmatic concentrations of TNF-α and IL-10 are expressed as pg/ml of plasma. C = non-tumour-bearing rats, T = tumour-bearing rats, T + TPH = tumour-bearing rats treated with theophylline. Values that are significantly different by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) are indicated by: ## p < 0.01 (tumour effect); *** p < 0.001 (treatment effect).
Effects of theophylline (50 mg/kg bw) on heart parameters in rats bearing the Yoshida AH-130 ascites hepatoma
| | | | | | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | |||||
| 77 ± 2 | 73 ± 2 | 72 ± 3 | ns | ns | |
| 26 ± 6 | 23 ± 1 | 20 ± 3 | ns | ns | |
| 12 ± 0.1 | 2 ± 0.3 | 11 ± 0.2 | ns | ns | |
| 9 ± 0.7 | 9 ± 0.2 | 10 ± 0.4 | ns | ns | |
| 2.6 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 3 ± 0.1 | ns | 0,012 | |
| 4 ± 0.2 | 3.2 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.2 | 0.05 | ns | |
| 217 ± 22 | 220 ± 14 | 190 ± 17 | ns | ns | |
| 50 ± 8 | 55 ± 4 | 48 ± 7 | ns | ns | |
| 167 ± 15 | 159 ± 10 | 139 ± 14 | ns | ns | |
| 313 ± 6 | 274 ± 10 | 322 ± 14 | 0,032 | 0,005 | |
Echocardiographic data of non-tumour bearing rats (C), tumour bearing rats (T) and tumour bearing rats treated with theophylline (T + TPH). Results are mean ± SEM. LV ejection fraction: (LV vol dia-LV vol sys)/LV vol dia; fractional shortening: (LVD dia-LVD sys)/LVD sys; Left ventricle diameter in diastole: LVD dia; Left ventricle diameter in systole: LVD sys; posterior wall thickness in diastole: PWT dia; posterior wall thickness in systole: PWT sys; left ventricle volume in diastole: LV Vol dia; left ventricle volume in systole: LV Vol sys; left ventricle stroke volume: LVSV (LV Vol dia- LV Vol sys); left ventricle mass: LV mass (expressed as mg/100 g of initial body weight). Statistical significance of the results by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); ns: non-significant differences. A (tumour effect); B (treatment effect).