Literature DB >> 28495634

Network-targeted cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation improves attentional control.

Michael Esterman1, Michelle Thai2, Hidefusa Okabe2, Joseph DeGutis3, Elyana Saad3, Simon E Laganiere4, Mark A Halko4.   

Abstract

Developing non-invasive brain stimulation interventions to improve attentional control is extremely relevant to a variety of neurological and psychiatric populations, yet few studies have identified reliable biomarkers that can be readily modified to improve attentional control. One potential biomarker of attention is functional connectivity in the core cortical network supporting attention - the dorsal attention network (DAN). We used a network-targeted cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) procedure, intended to enhance cortical functional connectivity in the DAN. Specifically, in healthy young adults we administered intermittent theta burst TMS (iTBS) to the midline cerebellar node of the DAN and, as a control, the right cerebellar node of the default mode network (DMN). These cerebellar targets were localized using individual resting-state fMRI scans. Participants completed assessments of both sustained (gradual onset continuous performance task, gradCPT) and transient attentional control (attentional blink) immediately before and after stimulation, in two sessions (cerebellar DAN and DMN). Following cerebellar DAN stimulation, participants had significantly fewer attentional lapses (lower commission error rates) on the gradCPT. In contrast, stimulation to the cerebellar DMN did not affect gradCPT performance. Further, in the DAN condition, individuals with worse baseline gradCPT performance showed the greatest enhancement in gradCPT performance. These results suggest that temporarily increasing functional connectivity in the DAN via network-targeted cerebellar stimulation can enhance sustained attention, particularly in those with poor baseline performance. With regard to transient attention, TMS stimulation improved attentional blink performance across both stimulation sites, suggesting increasing functional connectivity in both networks can enhance this aspect of attention. These findings have important implications for intervention applications of TMS and theoretical models of functional connectivity. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28495634      PMCID: PMC5973536          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  86 in total

1.  The history and basic principles of magnetic nerve stimulation.

Authors:  A T Barker
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1999

2.  Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  M Corbetta; J M Kincade; J M Ollinger; M P McAvoy; G L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Modelling non-invasive brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Carlo Miniussi; Justin A Harris; Manuela Ruzzoli
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  An emerging concept. The cerebellar contribution to higher function.

Authors:  J D Schmahmann
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1991-11

5.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation during positron emission tomography: a new method for studying connectivity of the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  T Paus; R Jech; C J Thompson; R Comeau; T Peters; A C Evans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Spatial and temporal functional connectivity changes between resting and attentive states.

Authors:  Signe Bray; Aiden E G F Arnold; Richard M Levy; Giuseppe Iaria
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Cerebellar magnetic stimulation decreases levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson disease.

Authors:  G Koch; L Brusa; F Carrillo; E Lo Gerfo; S Torriero; M Oliveri; P Mir; C Caltagirone; P Stanzione
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Differential contributions of the intraparietal sulcus and the inferior parietal lobe to attentional blink: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Ken Kihara; Takashi Ikeda; Daisuke Matsuyoshi; Nobuyuki Hirose; Tatsuya Mima; Hidenao Fukuyama; Naoyuki Osaka
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Combining correlation and interference methods in the human brain. Focus on "Cortico-cortical interactions in spatial attention: A combined ERP/TMS study".

Authors:  Paul C J Taylor; Anna C Nobre; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Connectivity supporting attention in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Anita D Barber; Lisa A Jacobson; Joanna L Wexler; Mary Beth Nebel; Brian S Caffo; James J Pekar; Stewart H Mostofsky
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.881

View more
  18 in total

1.  Functional Territories of Human Dentate Nucleus.

Authors:  Xavier Guell; Anila M D'Mello; Nicholas A Hubbard; Rachel R Romeo; John D E Gabrieli; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Jeremy D Schmahmann; Sheeba Arnold Anteraper
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Trauma-related psychiatric and behavioral conditions are uniquely associated with sustained attention dysfunction.

Authors:  Michael Esterman; Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Meghan E Pierce; Jennifer R Fonda; Joseph DeGutis; William Milberg; Regina McGlinchey
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Non-invasive Cerebellar Stimulation: Moving Towards Clinical Applications for Cerebellar and Extra-Cerebellar Disorders.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Mario Manto
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Individual differences in sustained attention are associated with cortical thickness.

Authors:  Alex Mitko; David Rothlein; Victoria Poole; Meghan Robinson; Regina McGlinchey; Joseph DeGutis; David Salat; Michael Esterman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  A narrative review on non-invasive stimulation of the cerebellum in neurological diseases.

Authors:  Luana Billeri; Antonino Naro
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Stimulus-Specific Visual Working Memory Representations in Human Cerebellar Lobule VIIb/VIIIa.

Authors:  James A Brissenden; Sean M Tobyne; Mark A Halko; David C Somers
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Cerebellar-Stimulation Evoked Prefrontal Electrical Synchrony Is Modulated by GABA.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; Laura M Rowland; Ann Summerfelt; Fow-Sen Choa; George F Wittenberg; Krista Wisner; Andrea Wijtenburg; Joshua Chiappelli; Peter Kochunov; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 8.  Personalizing neuromodulation.

Authors:  John D Medaglia; Brian Erickson; Jared Zimmerman; Apoorva Kelkar
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  A Causal Role of the Cerebellum in Auditory Feedback Control of Vocal Production.

Authors:  Danhua Peng; Qing Lin; Yichen Chang; Jeffery A Jones; Guoqing Jia; Xi Chen; Peng Liu; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  Variable rather than extreme slow reaction times distinguish brain states during sustained attention.

Authors:  Ayumu Yamashita; David Rothlein; Aaron Kucyi; Eve M Valera; Laura Germine; Jeremy Wilmer; Joseph DeGutis; Michael Esterman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.