Literature DB >> 2290495

The contribution of vision to asymmetries in manual aiming.

R G Carson1, R Chua, D Elliott, D Goodman.   

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to examine the hypothesis that the right hand system is superior in the processing of visual information. A manual aiming task utilizing four visual conditions was employed. In the full-vision (FV) condition subjects were afforded vision of both the hand and the target throughout the course of the movement. In the ambient-illumination-off (AO) condition, the room lights were extinguished at movement initiation, thus preventing vision of the moving limb. The target remained illuminated. In the target-off (TO) condition, the target was extinguished upon initiation of the movement. Ambient illumination and thus vision of the hand remained present. Finally there was a no-vision (NV) condition in which ambient illumination was removed and the target was extinguished upon initiation of the response movement. Although the manipulation of vision had potent effects upon terminal accuracy, and influenced reaction and movement time measures, the hands did not differ in the extent to which these characteristics were expressed. A left hand advantage for reaction time was observed. This may reflect a relative increase in right hemisphere involvement prior to aiming movements which are spatially complex.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2290495     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90056-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  33 in total

1.  Interlimb differences in control of movement extent.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Spatial interactions between consecutive manual responses.

Authors:  Brittany Avery; Christopher D Cowper-Smith; David A Westwood
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Hemifield or hemispace: what accounts for the ipsilateral advantages in visually guided aiming?

Authors:  David P Carey; Jonathan Liddle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Position sense asymmetry.

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Manual asymmetries in grasp pre-shaping and transport-grasp coordination.

Authors:  Jarugool Tretriluxana; James Gordon; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Movement structure in young and elderly adults during goal-directed movements of the left and right arm.

Authors:  Brach Poston; Arend W A Van Gemmert; Beth Barduson; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Intermanual transfer of proximal and distal motor engrams in humans.

Authors:  G Thut; N D Cook; M Regard; K L Leenders; U Halsband; T Landis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Reaching to ipsilateral or contralateral targets: within-hemisphere visuomotor processing cannot explain hemispatial differences in motor control.

Authors:  D P Carey; E L Hargreaves; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Motor asymmetry in elite fencers.

Authors:  Selcuk Akpinar; Robert L Sainburg; Sadettin Kirazci; Andrzej Przybyla
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 1.328

10.  Interlimb differences in coordination of rapid wrist/forearm movements.

Authors:  Gautum A Srinivasan; Tarika Embar; Robert Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.