Literature DB >> 26259747

Spatial interactions between consecutive manual responses.

Brittany Avery1, Christopher D Cowper-Smith2, David A Westwood3.   

Abstract

We have shown that the latency to initiate a reaching movement is increased if its direction is the same as a previous movement compared to movements that differ by 90° or 180° (Cowper-Smith and Westwood in Atten Percept Psychophys 75:1914-1922, 2013). An influential study (Taylor and Klein in J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:1639-1656, 2000), however, reported the opposite spatial pattern for manual keypress responses: repeated responses on the same side had reduced reaction time compared to responses on opposite sides. In order to determine whether there are fundamental differences in the patterns of spatial interactions between button-pressing responses and reaching movements, we compared both types of manual responses using common methods. Reaching movements and manual keypress responses were performed in separate blocks of trials using consecutive central arrow stimuli that directed participants to respond to left or right targets. Reaction times were greater for manual responses made to the same target as a previous response (M = 390 ms) as compared to the opposite target (M = 365 ms; similarity main effect: p < 0.001) regardless of whether the response was a reaching movement or a keypress response. This finding is broadly consistent with an inhibitory mechanism operating at the level of motor output that discourages movements that achieve the same spatial goal as a recent action.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arm movements; Attention; Inhibition of return; Manual responses; Reaching movements; Spatial coding; Target localization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26259747     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4396-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

Review 1.  Arbitrary associations between antecedents and actions.

Authors:  S P Wise; E A Murray
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return.

Authors:  T L Taylor; R M Klein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Richard A Andersen; Christopher A Buneo
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-27       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Inhibition of return and manual pointing movements.

Authors:  Martin H Fischer; Jay Pratt; Sebastiaan F W Neggers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-04

5.  Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.

Authors:  R HYMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-03

Review 6.  Coding of movements in the motor cortex.

Authors:  Apostolos P Georgopoulos; Adam F Carpenter
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Motor IOR revealed for reaching.

Authors:  C D Cowper-Smith; D A Westwood
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Central pattern generators for locomotion, with special reference to vertebrates.

Authors:  S Grillner; P Wallén
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space.

Authors:  J D Fisk; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Spatial interactions between successive eye and arm movements: signal type matters.

Authors:  Christopher D Cowper-Smith; Jonathan Harris; Gail A Eskes; David A Westwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.